World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 46 2813 2553 1349 1210 118 7658

David M. Bader publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David M. Bader between 1978 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David M. Bader published across 42 years, from 1978 to 2019, averaging 3.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2010. 6 of the 130 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2010. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 2 publications
1978 2019

130 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David M. Bader: publications per year, 1978 to 2019
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 3
1982 1
1983 1
1984 2
1985 2
1986 2
1987 3
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 5
1996 3
1997 1
1998 0
1999 3
2000 5
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 4
2005 6
2006 6
2007 3
2008 6
2009 5
2010 9
2011 4
2012 7
2013 6
2014 8
2015 3
2016 4
2017 3
2018 4
2019 2
Total 130
Download as CSV

David M. Bader publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Bader sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 117–126 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 118 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177 118
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

David M. Bader D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David M. Bader sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121 46
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

David M. Bader is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their recent research contributions include a publication titled Table of Contents, released in 2021 in The Journal of Pediatrics.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with David M. Bader include:

  • Jennifer L. Reed
  • Sihame Amlal
  • Daniel Schumacher
  • Ben Kerrey
  • David Schnadower

The primary venue for their known publication is:

  • The Journal of Pediatrics

David M. Bader has received recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Immunochemical analysis of myosin heavy chain during avian myogenesis in vivo and in vitro

    D Bader;T Masaki;D A Fischman

  • The serosal mesothelium is a major source of smooth muscle cells of the gut vasculature.

    Bettina Wilm;Annemieke Ipenberg;Nicholas D. Hastie;John B. E. Burch

  • Expression of the atrial-specific myosin heavy chain AMHC1 and the establishment of anteroposterior polarity in the developing chicken heart.

    Katherine E. Yutzey;Jeanne T. Rhee;David Bader

  • Development of the coronary vessel system.

    David E. Reese;Takashi Mikawa;David M. Bader

  • Mesothelium contributes to vascular smooth muscle and mesenchyme during lung development

    Jianwen Que;Bettina Wilm;Hiroshi Hasegawa;Fan Wang

  • Canonical Notch signaling in the developing lung is required for determination of arterial smooth muscle cells and selection of Clara versus ciliated cell fate

    Mitsuru Morimoto;Zhenyi Liu;Hui-Teng Cheng;Niki Winters

  • The chick embryo as an expanding experimental model for cancer and cardiovascular research.

    Kristin H. Kain;James W.I. Miller;Celestial R. Jones-Paris;Rebecca T. Thomason

  • Epicardial/Mesothelial Cell Line Retains Vasculogenic Potential of Embryonic Epicardium

    Aya M. Wada;Travis K. Smith;Megan E. Osler;David E. Reese

  • Identification and characterization of a ventricular-specific avian myosin heavy chain, VMHC1: expression in differentiating cardiac and skeletal muscle.

    Joseph G. Bisaha;David Bader

  • In vitro analysis of cardiac progenitor cell differentiation

    Arlene Gonzalez-Sanchez;David Bader

  • Molecular Cloning and Expression of Two Novel Avian Cytochrome P450 1A Enzymes Induced by 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin

    Deidre Gilday;Maureen Gannon;Katherine Yutzey;David Bader

  • Expression of sarcomeric myosin in the presumptive myocardium of chicken embryos occurs within six hours of myocyte commitment

    Y. Han;J. E. Dennis;L. Cohen-Gould;D. M. Bader

  • Initiation of cardiac differentiation occurs in the absence of anterior endoderm

    Maureen Gannon;David Bader

  • Diversification of Cardiomyogenic Cell Lineages During Early Heart Development

    Katherine E. Yutzey;David Bader

  • Bves: prototype of a new class of cell adhesion molecules expressed during coronary artery development.

    Aya M. Wada;David E. Reese;David M. Bader

  • bves: A novel gene expressed during coronary blood vessel development.

    David E. Reese;Maja Zavaljevski;Nicole L. Streiff;David Bader

  • Diversification of Cardiomyogenic Cell Lineages in Vitro

    Katherine E. Yutzey;Maureen Gannon;David Bader

  • Repair and reorganization of minced cardiac muscle in the adult newt (Notophthalmus viridescens)

    David Bader;John O. Oberpriller

  • Paneth cell ablation in the presence of Klebsiella pneumoniae induces necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)-like injury in the small intestine of immature mice

    Chunxian Zhang;Michael P. Sherman;Lawrence S. Prince;David Bader

  • Immunochemical analysis of myosin heavy chains in the developing chicken heart

    Arlene González-Sánchez;David Bader

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald A. Fischman
Donald A. Fischman Cornell University
Keith T. Wilson
Keith T. Wilson Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Katherine E. Yutzey
Katherine E. Yutzey Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
William M. Grady
William M. Grady Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Bruce M. Carlson
Bruce M. Carlson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Charles C. Hong
Charles C. Hong University of Maryland, Baltimore
Elizabeth Harris
Elizabeth Harris University of New South Wales
Andrew P. Jackson
Andrew P. Jackson University of Edinburgh
Edgar A. Otto
Edgar A. Otto University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Nicholas Katsanis
Nicholas Katsanis Galatea Bio Inc

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens the door to diverse online education and career opportunities in related scientific and healthcare fields. Many students pursue degrees at non profit online universities to benefit from quality instruction, flexibility, and accreditation. These options are particularly attractive to those seeking affordable and reputable programs.

For active-duty personnel and veterans, enrolling in military friendly online schools ensures that unique needs are met, from financial aid to transfer credits and support services. Online formats allow for balancing education with military commitments.

Graduates in Molecular Biology interested in expanding into social service careers may consider the best online msw programs. These programs train professionals to support individuals and communities using a solid scientific foundation.

Alternatively, those looking to move into mental health and research without interrupting their careers can benefit from masters in psychology online, some of which offer accelerated pathways. These options make continuing education and career growth more accessible to students from all backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing David M. Bader

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles