World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Donald A. Fischman

Donald A. Fischman

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
58
Citations
11223
World Ranking
13259
National Ranking
5646

Donald A. Fischman publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald A. Fischman sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 122 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Donald A. Fischman D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald A. Fischman sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald A. Fischman is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their career has been focused within the academic environment of this institution.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues linked to Donald A. Fischman in the available data. Similarly, there are no records of book publications or documented main fields of study.

Details regarding specific subfields of study or main topics of research work associated with Donald A. Fischman have not been provided.

Information about any awards won by Donald A. Fischman, including award name or the year they were awarded, is not available.

Best Publications

  • Immunochemical analysis of myosin heavy chain during avian myogenesis in vivo and in vitro

    D Bader;T Masaki;D A Fischman

  • Retroviral analysis of cardiac morphogenesis: discontinuous formation of coronary vessels.

    Takashi Mikawa;Donald A. Fischman

  • AN ELECTRON MICROSCOPE STUDY OF MYOFIBRIL FORMATION IN EMBRYONIC CHICK SKELETAL MUSCLE

    Donald A. Fischman

  • Removal of Z-lines and alpha-actinin from isolated myofibrils by a calcium-activated neutral protease.

    M K Reddy;J D Etlinger;M Rabinowitz;D A Fischman

  • Compartmentalization of bicarbonate-sensitive adenylyl cyclase in distinct signaling microdomains

    Jonathan H. Zippin;Yanqiu Chen;Patrick Nahirney;Patrick Nahirney;Margarita Kamenetsky

  • Differential distribution of subsets of myofibrillar proteins in cardiac nonstriated and striated myofibrils.

    T. Schultheiss;Zhongxiang Lin;Mei-Hua Lu;J. Murray

  • Fibroblast growth factor receptor is required for in vivo cardiac myocyte proliferation at early embryonic stages of heart development.

    T Mima;H Ueno;D A Fischman;L T Williams

  • Origin of osteoclasts from mononuclear leucocytes in regenerating newt limbs.

    Donald A. Fischman;Elizabeth D. Hay

  • Clonal analysis of cardiac morphogenesis in the chicken embryo using a replication-defective retrovirus: I. Formation of the ventricular myocardium.

    T. Mikawa;A. Borisov;A. M. C. Brown;D. A. Fischman

  • The major myosin-binding domain of skeletal muscle MyBP-C (C protein) resides in the COOH-terminal, immunoglobulin C2 motif.

    Tsuyoshi Okagaki;Franz E. Weber;Donald A. Fischman;Kevin T. Vaughan

  • Bicarbonate-responsive soluble adenylyl cyclase defines a nuclear cAMP microdomain

    Jonathan H. Zippin;Jeanne Farrell;David Huron;Margarita Kamenetsky

  • Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding avian skeletal muscle C-protein: an intracellular member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.

    Steven Einheber;Donald A. Fischman

  • Sequential appearance of muscle‐specific proteins in myoblasts as a function of time after cell division: Evidence for a conserved myoblast differentiation program in skeletal muscle

    Zhongxiang Lin;Mei‐Hua Lu;Thomas Schultheiss;John Choi

  • The carboxyl terminus of myosin binding protein C (MyBP-C, C-protein) specifies incorporation into the A-band of striated muscle

    Rénald Gilbert;Michael G. Kelly;Takashi Mikawa;Donald A. Fischman

  • The vinculin/sarcomeric-alpha-actinin/alpha-actin nexus in cultured cardiac myocytes

    Mei-Hua Lu;C. Dilullo;T. Schultheiss;S. Holtzer

  • In vivo analysis of a new lacZ retrovirus vector suitable for cell lineage marking in avian and other species.

    Takashi Mikawa;Donald A. Fischman;Joseph P. Dougherty;Anthony M.C. Brown

  • Expression of sarcomeric myosin in the presumptive myocardium of chicken embryos occurs within six hours of myocyte commitment

    Y. Han;J. E. Dennis;L. Cohen-Gould;D. M. Bader

  • Clonal analysis of cardiac morphogenesis in the chicken embryo using a replication-defective retrovirus. III: Polyclonal origin of adjacent ventricular myocytes

    Takashi Mikawa;Leona Cohen-Gould;Donald A. Fischman

  • Complete sequence of human fast-type and slow-type muscle myosin-binding-protein C (MyBP-C). Differential expression, conserved domain structure and chromosome assignment

    Franz E. Weber;Kevin T. Vaughan;Fernando C. Reinach;Donald A. Fischman

  • Isoforms of C-protein in adult chicken skeletal muscle: detection with monoclonal antibodies.

    F C Reinach;T Masaki;S Shafiq;T Obinata

Frequent Co-Authors

Takashi Mikawa
Takashi Mikawa University of California, San Francisco
David M. Bader
David M. Bader Vanderbilt University
James E. Dennis
James E. Dennis Baylor College of Medicine
Ulrich Hämmerling
Ulrich Hämmerling Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Giovanni Manfredi
Giovanni Manfredi Cornell University
Tomoh Masaki
Tomoh Masaki Kyoto University
Michael Leitges
Michael Leitges University of Oslo
Lonny R. Levin
Lonny R. Levin Cornell University
Anthony M. C. Brown
Anthony M. C. Brown Cornell University
Jochen Buck
Jochen Buck Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a wide range of in-demand careers in healthcare and life sciences. Many students leverage this foundation to pursue practical, hands-on roles available through online degree programs. These programs offer flexibility and often provide pathways to rewarding careers while accommodating different educational backgrounds and financial needs.

For example, if you’re interested in diagnostic imaging, online radiology tech programs allow you to train for roles as radiologic technologists—a field in high demand across the U.S. Students who want to focus on nutrition and food science might consider top-ranked top dietetics programs in the us, leading to professional opportunities as registered dietitians.

Medical assisting is another popular pathway; those seeking cost-effective training can look for online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid to start their healthcare career sooner. Already a certified medical assistant? You can further your qualifications through a cma to lpn bridge program online, opening up even more opportunities for advancement.

These flexible online degrees and pathways make it easier than ever to translate your biology or biochemistry studies into a meaningful, rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Donald A. Fischman

Recently Published Articles