World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
5503
World Ranking
8888
National Ranking
662

David Copplestone publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Copplestone sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 153 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

David Copplestone D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Copplestone sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Copplestone is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the interaction between radiation and biological systems, particularly in the context of environmental and ecological impacts.

The scientist's work spans several main fields, notably Agricultural and Biological Sciences with a primary concentration in Insect Science. Subfields connected to their research include Global and Planetary Change, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, and Genetics.

Main research topics that have been frequently addressed in their publications cover:

  • Radioactive contamination and transfer
  • Nuclear and radioactivity studies
  • Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Insect behavior and control techniques

David Copplestone has published numerous papers in recognized scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Annals of the ICRP
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
  • Journal of Radiological Protection

Notable recent papers are:

  • Radiological risk assessment to marine biota from exposure to NORM from a decommissioned offshore oil and gas pipeline (2022), Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
  • Chernobyl-level radiation exposure damages bumblebee reproduction: a laboratory experiment (2020), Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Protection of the environment (2020), Annals of the ICRP
  • Ecologically relevant radiation exposure triggers elevated metabolic rate and nectar consumption in bumblebees (2022), Functional Ecology
  • Modelling the effects of ionising radiation on a vole population from the Chernobyl Red forest in an ecological context (2020), Ecological Modelling

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several researchers, particularly with Mathew P. Johansen, Nicholas A. Beresford, Michael D. Wood, Tom Cresswell, and J. Vives i Batlle, highlighting a multidisciplinary approach in the study of radiation effects on living organisms and environmental safety.

Best Publications

  • The ERICA Tool

    Justin Brown;Boris Alfonso;Rodolfo Moreno Avila;Nicholas A Beresford

  • Environmental Protection: Transfer Parameters for Reference Animals and Plants:

    P Strand;N Beresford;D Copplestone;J Godoy

  • A new version of the ERICA tool to facilitate impact assessments of radioactivity on wild plants and animals.

    Justin Brown;Boris Alfonso;Rodolfo Moreno Avila;Nicholas A Beresford

  • The development and purpose of the FREDERICA radiation effects database

    David Copplestone;Joanne L Hingston;Almudena Real

  • Protection of the environment from ionising radiation in a regulatory context (protect): proposed numerical benchmark values.

    Pål Andersson;Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace;Nicholas A. Beresford;David Copplestone

  • Derivation of transfer parameters for use within the ERICA Tool and the default concentration ratios for terrestrial biota.

    N.A. Beresford;C.L. Barnett;B.J. Howard;W.A. Scott

  • D-ERICA: An integrated approach to the assessment and management of environmental risk from ionising radiation. Description of purpose, methodology and application.

    Nick Beresford;Justin Brown;David Copplestone;Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace

  • Issues and practices in the use of effects data from FREDERICA in the ERICA Integrated Approach

    Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace;David Copplestone;Rodolphe Gilbin;Frederic Alonzo

  • The IAEA handbook on radionuclide transfer to wildlife

    B.J. Howard;N.A. Beresford;D. Copplestone;D. Telleria

  • A multi-criteria weight of evidence approach for deriving ecological benchmarks for radioactive substances

    Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace;Claire Della-Vedova;P Andersson;D Copplestone

  • First derivation of predicted-no-effect values for freshwater and terrestrial ecosystems exposed to radioactive substances.

    Jacqueline Garnier-Laplace;Claire Della-Vedova;Rodolphe Gilbin;David Copplestone

  • IAEA Handbook of parameter values for the prediction of radionuclide transfer to wildlife.

    Brenda J. Howard;Nick Beresford;D. Copplestone;D. Telleria

  • Application of Draft 4a of the ICRP report on Environmental Protection: the Concept and Use of Reference Animals and Plants

    D. Copplestone;J. E. Brown;N. A. Beresford

  • ICRP Publication 124: Protection of the Environment under Different Exposure Situations.

    Pentreath Rj;Lochard J;Larsson Cm;Cool Da

  • An international database of radionuclide concentration ratios for wildlife: development and uses.

    David Copplestone;Nicholas A Beresford;Justin Brown;Tamara L Yankovich

  • Inter-comparison of models to estimate radionuclide activity concentrations in non-human biota.

    N. A. Beresford;C. L. Barnett;J. E. Brown;J. J. Cheng

  • The organochlorine contamination history of the Mersey estuary, UK, revealed by analysis of sediment cores from salt marshes.

    Winston M Fox;Les Connor;David Copplestone;Michael S Johnson

  • An international comparison of models and approaches for the estimation of the radiological exposure of non-human biota.

    Nicholas A. Beresford;Mikhail Balonov;Karine Beaugelin-Seiller;Justin Brown

  • Inter-comparison of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota

    J Vives I Batlle;Mikhail Balonov;Karine Beaugelin-Seiller;N A Beresford

  • Effects of ionizing radiation on wildlife: what knowledge have we gained between the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents?

    Nicholas A Beresford;David Copplestone

  • Estimating the exposure of small mammals at three sites within the Chernobyl exclusion zone – a test application of the ERICA Tool

    N A Beresford;Sergey Gaschak;Catherine L Barnett;B J Howard

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas A. Beresford
Nicholas A. Beresford University of Salford
Brenda J. Howard
Brenda J. Howard University of Nottingham
Justin Brown
Justin Brown Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority
Deborah Oughton
Deborah Oughton Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Jim T. Smith
Jim T. Smith University of Portsmouth
John M. Brown
John M. Brown University of Oxford
Ross A. Jeffree
Ross A. Jeffree International Atomic Energy Agency
Theodore B. Henry
Theodore B. Henry Heriot-Watt University
Awadhesh N. Jha
Awadhesh N. Jha Plymouth University
Martin H. Gerzabek
Martin H. Gerzabek BOKU University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in branching out from Environmental Sciences, several related online degrees offer promising career pathways. Those seeking affordable education options may explore an online general studies bachelor degree cheap. This flexible degree can provide a solid foundation while keeping costs manageable.

Some learners prefer programs that balance rigor with manageability. In this context, an easiest bachelor’s degree might appeal to students aiming to complete their education efficiently without sacrificing quality.

For those specifically interested in Earth sciences, pursuing an online geology online degree offers specialized knowledge related to the physical environment, complementing environmental science studies.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) has become crucial in environmental analysis. Students can benefit from accredited GIS degree programs that teach mapping and spatial data skills essential for modern environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing David Copplestone

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles