World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
10640
World Ranking
6620
National Ranking
2362

Darold E. Ward publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darold E. Ward sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Darold E. Ward D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darold E. Ward sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Darold E. Ward is affiliated with the US Forest Service in the United States. Their professional work centers on forestry and related scientific domains, contributing at a governmental level to the management and study of forest ecosystems.

While specific recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, and book publications are not listed, Darold E. Ward's involvement with the US Forest Service suggests a focus on applied research within forestry, conservation, and natural resource management.

The absence of detailed publication data and specific fields of study limits a precise summary of research specialization. However, association with a major federal agency like the US Forest Service typically indicates engagement in topics such as forest ecology, silviculture, forest health, wildfire management, and sustainability practices.

Darold E. Ward's profile does not include recorded awards, indicating that any commendations or recognitions for their scientific work are either informal, unrecorded, or outside public academic records accessible here.

The neutral and objective presentation of this scientist's profile provides factual insight into their affiliation without speculative interpretation, given the available data.

Best Publications

  • Potential global fire monitoring from EOS‐MODIS

    Yoram J. Kaufman;Christopher O. Justice;Luke P. Flynn;Jackie D. Kendall

  • Comprehensive Laboratory Measurements of Biomass-Burning Emissions: 1. Emissions from Indonesian, African, and Other Fuels

    Ted J. Christian;B. Kleiss;Robert J. Yokelson;R. Holzinger

  • Open-path Fourier transform infrared studies of large-scale laboratory biomass fires

    Robert J. Yokelson;David W. T. Griffith;Darold E. Ward

  • Emissions from smoldering combustion of biomass measured by open-path Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

    Robert J. Yokelson;Ronald A. Susott;Darold E. Ward;James J. Reardon

  • Relationships of fire, biomass and nutrient dynamics along a vegetation gradient in the Brazilian Cerrado

    J. Boone Kauffman;D. L. Cummings;D. E. Ward

  • Smoke, Clouds, and Radiation-Brazil (SCAR-B) Experiment

    Y. J. Kaufman;P. V. Hobbs;V. W. J. H. Kirchhoff;P. Artaxo

  • Smoke emissions from wildland fires

    Darold E. Ward;Colin C. Hardy

  • Fire in the Brazilian Amazon: 1. Biomass, nutrient pools, and losses in slashed primary forests.

    J. Boone Kauffman;D. L. Cummings;D. E. Ward;R. Babbitt

  • Smoke and fire characteristics for cerrado and deforestation burns in Brazil: BASE-B experiment

    D. E. Ward;R. A. Susott;J. B. Kauffman;R. E. Babbitt

  • Emissions of formaldehyde, acetic acid, methanol, and other trace gases from biomass fires in North Carolina measured by airborne Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

    Robert J. Yokelson;Jon G. Goode;Darold E. Ward;Ronald A. Susott

  • An overview of GOES‐8 diurnal fire and smoke results for SCAR‐B and 1995 fire season in South America

    Elaine M. Prins;Joleen M. Feltz;W. Paul Menzel;Darold E. Ward

  • Effect of fuel composition on combustion efficiency and emission factors for African savanna ecosystems

    D. E. Ward;W. M. Hao;R. A. Susott;R. E. Babbitt

  • Measurements of excess O3, CO2, CO, CH4, C2H4, C2H2, HCN, NO, NH3, HCOOH, CH3COOH, HCHO, and CH3OH in 1997 Alaskan biomass burning plumes by airborne Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (AFTIR)

    Jon G. Goode;Robert J. Yokelson;Darold E. Ward;Ronald A. Susott

  • Characterization of the optical properties of biomass burning aerosols in Zambia during the 1997 ZIBBEE field campaign

    T. F. Eck;B. N. Holben;D. E. Ward;O. Dubovik

  • Biomass Burning Airborne and Spaceborne Experiment in the Amazonas (BASE-A)

    Y. J. Kaufman;A. Setzer;D. Ward;D. Tanre

  • Variability of biomass burning aerosol optical characteristics in southern Africa during the SAFARI 2000 dry season campaign and a comparison of single scattering albedo estimates from radiometric measurements

    T. F. Eck;T. F. Eck;B. N. Holben;D. E. Ward;M. M. Mukelabai

  • Trace gas and particle emissions from fires in large diameter and belowground biomass fuels

    Isaac Bertschi;Robert J. Yokelson;Darold E. Ward;Ron E. Babbitt

  • Trace gas measurements in nascent, aged, and cloud‐processed smoke from African savanna fires by airborne Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (AFTIR)

    Robert J. Yokelson;Isaac T. Bertschi;Ted J. Christian;Peter V. Hobbs

  • Fuel biomass and combustion factors associated with fires in savanna ecosystems of South Africa and Zambia

    Ronald W. Shea;Barbara W. Shea;J. Boone Kauffman;Darold E. Ward

  • Fire in the Brazilian Amazon 2. Biomass, nutrient pools and losses in cattle pastures.

    J. Boone Kauffman;D. L. Cummings;D. E. Ward

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Yokelson
Robert J. Yokelson University of Montana
Wei Min Hao
Wei Min Hao US Forest Service
Brent N. Holben
Brent N. Holben Goddard Space Flight Center
Peter V. Hobbs
Peter V. Hobbs University of Washington
Yoram J. Kaufman
Yoram J. Kaufman Goddard Space Flight Center
Alberto Setzer
Alberto Setzer National Institute for Space Research
Christopher O. Justice
Christopher O. Justice University of Maryland, College Park
Oleg Dubovik
Oleg Dubovik University of Lille
Alexander Smirnov
Alexander Smirnov Goddard Space Flight Center
Lawrence F. Radke
Lawrence F. Radke National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many learners consider affordable and flexible options, such as an dsw programs online, which focus on social work but include environmental social justice themes relevant to sustainability careers.

Those seeking a broader educational foundation may find an accredited affordable online general studies degree appealing. This pathway allows for interdisciplinary studies, integrating environmental topics with business, policy, or communication, enhancing career flexibility.

For students aiming to balance commitment and career goals, exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can provide insight into degree programs with manageable coursework and schedules, helping maintain steady progress toward graduation.

Specifically aligned with Environmental Sciences, pursuing an online geoscience degree offers specialized knowledge essential for roles in environmental consulting, resource management, and conservation science. Together, these options illustrate diverse educational pathways supporting sustainable environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Darold E. Ward

Recently Published Articles