World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
6187
World Ranking
8074
National Ranking
610

Daniel S. Read publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Read sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 84 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Daniel S. Read D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel S. Read sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel S. Read is affiliated with the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the United Kingdom. Their research specializes primarily within the field of Environmental Science, encompassing an extensive publication record that includes over one hundred contributions.

Their work spans several subfields, including:

  • Ecology
  • Pollution
  • Molecular Biology
  • Water Science and Technology
  • Molecular Medicine

Key topics of research addressed in their publications include:

  • Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
  • Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Gut microbiota and health

Frequent publication venues for Daniel S. Read's work are:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Water Research
  • Environmental DNA
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Daniel S. Read include:

  • Identification and Quantification of Microplastics in Potable Water and Their Sources within Water Treatment Works in England and Wales, 2020, Environmental Science & Technology
  • Contrasting community assembly processes structure lotic bacteria metacommunities along the river continuum, 2020, Environmental Microbiology
  • Semi-automated analysis of microplastics in complex wastewater samples, 2020, Environmental Pollution
  • Systematic review of wastewater surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in human populations, 2022, Environment International
  • Niche and local geography shape the pangenome of wastewater- and livestock-associated Enterobacteriaceae, 2021, Science Advances

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel S. Read include:

  • Hyun S. Gweon
  • Kevin Chau
  • Derrick W. Crook
  • Nicole Stoesser
  • Tim Goodall

Best Publications

  • Molecular analysis of predation: a review of best practice for DNA-based approaches.

    R. A. King;D. S. Read;M. Traugott;M. Traugott;William Oliver Christian Symondson

  • Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.

    Bernd Hänfling;Lori Lawson Handley;Daniel S. Read;Christoph Hahn

  • PIPITS: an automated pipeline for analyses of fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences from the Illumina sequencing platform

    Hyun S. Gweon;Anna Oliver;Joanne Taylor;Tim Booth

  • Catchment-scale biogeography of riverine bacterioplankton

    Daniel S Read;Hyun S Gweon;Michael J Bowes;Lindsay K Newbold

  • Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds

    Lynsey R. Harper;Andrew S. Buxton;Helen C. Rees;Kat Bruce

  • Identification and Quantification of Microplastics in Potable Water and Their Sources within Water Treatment Works in England and Wales.

    Andrew C. Johnson;Hollie Ball;Richard Cross;Alice A. Horton

  • Contrasting community assembly processes structure lotic bacteria metacommunities along the river continuum

    Hyun S. Gweon;Michael J. Bowes;Heather L. Moorhouse;Anna E. Oliver

  • Semi-automated analysis of microplastics in complex wastewater samples.

    Alice A. Horton;Richard K. Cross;Daniel S. Read;Monika D. Jürgens

  • Temporal and spatial variation in distribution of fish environmental DNA in England’s largest lake

    Lori Lawson Handley;Daniel S. Read;Ian J. Winfield;Helen Kimbell

  • Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding of pond water as a tool to survey conservation and management priority mammals

    Lynsey R. Harper;Lynsey R. Harper;Lori Lawson Handley;Angus I. Carpenter;Muhammad Ghazali

  • The effect of anthropogenic arsenic contamination on the earthworm microbiome

    Daniel Antony Pass;Andrew John Morgan;Daniel S. Read;Dawn Field

  • Spatial and temporal changes in chlorophyll-a concentrations in the River Thames basin, UK: are phosphorus concentrations beginning to limit phytoplankton biomass?

    M.J. Bowes;E. Gozzard;A.C. Johnson;P.M. Scarlett

  • Molecular detection of predation by soil micro-arthropods on nematodes.

    Daniel Steven Read;Samuel Keir Sheppard;Michael William Bruford;D. M. Glen

  • The effect of filtration method on the efficiency of environmental DNA capture and quantification via metabarcoding.

    Jianlong. Li;Lori Jayne. Lawson Handley;Daniel S.. Read;Bernd. Hänfling

  • The impact of sequencing depth on the inferred taxonomic composition and AMR gene content of metagenomic samples

    H. Soon Gweon;Liam P. Shaw;Jeremy Swann;Nicola De Maio

  • Soil pH effects on the interactions between dissolved zinc, non-nano- and nano-ZnO with soil bacterial communities

    Daniel S. Read;Marianne Matzke;Hyun S. Gweon;Lindsay K. Newbold

  • Niche and local geography shape the pangenome of wastewater- and livestock-associated Enterobacteriaceae.

    Liam P. Shaw;Kevin K. Chau;James Kavanagh;Manal AbuOun

  • Impacts of climate change, land-use change and phosphorus reduction on phytoplankton in the River Thames (UK)

    Gianbattista Bussi;Paul G. Whitehead;Michael J. Bowes;Daniel S. Read

  • Identifying multiple stressor controls on phytoplankton dynamics in the River Thames (UK) using high-frequency water quality data

    M.J. Bowes;M. Loewenthal;D.S. Read;M.G. Hutchins

  • Online fluorescence spectroscopy for the real-time evaluation of the microbial quality of drinking water

    J.P.R. Sorensen;A. Vivanco;M.J. Ascott;D.C. Gooddy

  • A cost-effectiveness analysis of water security and water quality: impacts of climate and land-use change on the River Thames system

    P. G. Whitehead;J. Crossman;B. B. Balana;M. N. Futter

  • Optimising sample preparation for FTIR-based microplastic analysis in wastewater and sludge samples: multiple digestions.

    Serena Cunsolo;John Williams;Michelle Hale;Daniel S. Read

  • Toxic interactions of different silver forms with freshwater green algae and cyanobacteria and their effects on mechanistic endpoints and the production of extracellular polymeric substances

    Cameron Taylor;Marianne Matzke;Alexandra Kroll;Daniel S. Read

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Bowes
Michael J. Bowes Natural Environment Research Council
Derrick W. Crook
Derrick W. Crook University of Oxford
Nicole Stoesser
Nicole Stoesser University of Oxford
Tim E. A. Peto
Tim E. A. Peto University of Oxford
Dan Lapworth
Dan Lapworth British Geological Survey
Mark J. Bailey
Mark J. Bailey Natural Environment Research Council
Bernd Hänfling
Bernd Hänfling University of Hull
A. Sarah Walker
A. Sarah Walker University of Oxford
Robert Sebra
Robert Sebra Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Claus Svendsen
Claus Svendsen Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that often intersect with public policy, social sciences, and leadership roles. For those interested in public administration and shaping sustainable policies, pursuing online MPA degrees offers a streamlined route into environmental governance and management.

Understanding societal impacts on the environment is crucial, making a foundation in social sciences valuable. Students aiming to deepen their knowledge in this area may consider the best online bachelor degree in sociology, which provides insights into human behavior, social structures, and community dynamics.

For advanced professionals looking to expand their expertise without the traditional hurdles, doctorate degree online no dissertation options allow for flexible doctoral studies focused on applied research and leadership.

Additionally, educators seeking to elevate their credentials may find valuable opportunities through eds to edd bridge programs online, designed to transition smoothly from educational specialist degrees to doctoral levels while maintaining professional responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel S. Read

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles