World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel P. Kiehart

Daniel P. Kiehart

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
14128
World Ranking
11870
National Ranking
5100

Daniel P. Kiehart publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Kiehart sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 127 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Daniel P. Kiehart D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Kiehart sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Daniel P. Kiehart is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on subfields including Cell Biology, Biophysics, Molecular Biology, Ocean Engineering, and Biomaterials.

The scientist's work covers a variety of topics, prominently featuring Cellular Mechanics and Interactions, Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation, Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques, Marine Biology and Environmental Chemistry, Silk-based biomaterials and applications, Cell Image Analysis Techniques, and Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Daniel P. Kiehart include Janice M. Crawford, Daniel Haertter, Stephanie M. Fogerson, Christoph F. Schmidt, and Stefano Di Talia.

They have published research in several venues, notably bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Developmental Biology, UNC Libraries, Development, and the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Daniel P. Kiehart include:

  • "DeepProjection: specific and robust projection of curved 2D tissue sheets from 3D microscopy using deep learning" (2022), Development
  • "Wound repair in sea urchin larvae involves pigment cells and blastocoelar cells" (2022), Developmental Biology
  • "A minimal vertex model explains how the amnioserosa avoids fluidization during Drosophila dorsal closure" (2024), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Notochord segmentation in zebrafish controlled by iterative mechanical signaling" (2024), Developmental Cell
  • "Minimal vertex model explains how the amnioserosa avoids fluidization during Drosophila dorsal closure" (2023), arXiv (Cornell University)

Daniel P. Kiehart was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • Lattice Light Sheet Microscopy: Imaging Molecules to Embryos at High Spatiotemporal Resolution

    Bi Chang Chen;Wesley R. Legant;Kai Wang;Lin Shao

  • Multiple forces contribute to cell sheet morphogenesis for dorsal closure in Drosophila.

    Daniel P. Kiehart;Catherine G. Galbraith;Kevin A. Edwards;Wayne L. Rickoll

  • Morphogenesis in Drosophila requires nonmuscle myosin heavy chain function.

    P E Young;A M Richman;A S Ketchum;D P Kiehart

  • Visualizing Intracellular Organelle and Cytoskeletal Interactions at Nanoscale Resolution on Millisecond Timescales.

    Yuting Guo;Di Li;Siwei Zhang;Yanrui Yang

  • Forces for Morphogenesis Investigated with Laser Microsurgery and Quantitative Modeling

    M. Shane Hutson;Yoichiro Tokutake;Ming-Shien Chang;James W. Bloor

  • Cytoplasmic myosin from Drosophila melanogaster.

    D P Kiehart;R Feghali

  • Polymerization of actin. IV. Role of Ca++ and H+ in the assembly of actin and in membrane fusion in the acrosomal reaction of echinoderm sperm.

    LG Tilney;DP Kiehart;C Sardet;M Tilney

  • The regulatory light chain of nonmuscle myosin is encoded by spaghetti-squash, a gene required for cytokinesis in Drosophila

    Roger E. Karess;Xiao-jia Chang;Kevin A. Edwards;Sanjay Kulkarni

  • Dynamic changes in the distribution of cytoplasmic myosin during Drosophila embryogenesis.

    Paul E. Young;Thomas C. Pesacreta;Daniel P. Kiehart

  • GFP-Moesin Illuminates Actin Cytoskeleton Dynamics in Living Tissue and Demonstrates Cell Shape Changes during Morphogenesis in Drosophila

    Kevin A. Edwards;Maddy Demsky;Ruth A. Montague;Nate Weymouth

  • Apoptotic force and tissue dynamics during Drosophila embryogenesis

    Yusuke Toyama;Xomalin G. Peralta;Adrienne R. Wells;Daniel P. Kiehart

  • Nonmuscle Myosin II Generates Forces that Transmit Tension and Drive Contraction in Multiple Tissues during Dorsal Closure

    Josef D. Franke;Ruth A. Montague;Daniel P. Kiehart

  • Dynamics and elasticity of the fibronectin matrix in living cell culture visualized by fibronectin-green fluorescent protein.

    Tomoo Ohashi;Daniel P. Kiehart;Harold P. Erickson

  • Triggering a Cell Shape Change by Exploiting Preexisting Actomyosin Contractions

    Minna Roh-Johnson;Gidi Shemer;Christopher D. Higgins;Joseph H. McClellan

  • Studies on the in vivo sensitivity of spindle microtubules to calcium ions and evidence for a vesicular calcium-sequestering system.

    Daniel P. Kiehart

  • Drosophila nonmuscle myosin II has multiple essential roles in imaginal disc and egg chamber morphogenesis

    Kevin A. Edwards;Daniel P. Kiehart

  • Temporal sequence and spatial distribution of early events of fertilization in single sea urchin eggs

    A Eisen;D P Kiehart;S J Wieland;G T Reynolds

  • Microinjection of echinoderm eggs: apparatus and procedures.

    Daniel P. Kiehart

  • Free-electron-laser-based biophysical and biomedical instrumentation

    G. S. Edwards;R. H. Austin;F. E. Carroll;M. L. Copeland

  • Drosophila spectrin. II. Conserved features of the alpha-subunit are revealed by analysis of cDNA clones and fusion proteins.

    T. J. Byers;R. Dubreuil;D. Branton;D. P. Kiehart

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas D. Pollard
Thomas D. Pollard Yale University
Lawrence S.B. Goldstein
Lawrence S.B. Goldstein University of California, San Diego
Daniel Branton
Daniel Branton Harvard University
John A. Cooper
John A. Cooper Washington University in St. Louis
Bob Goldstein
Bob Goldstein University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Harold P. Erickson
Harold P. Erickson Duke University
Stephan W. Grill
Stephan W. Grill Max Planck Society
Michael Ashburner
Michael Ashburner University of Cambridge
andrew g clark
andrew g clark Cornell University
Richard F. Haglund
Richard F. Haglund Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career paths, especially in the healthcare and life sciences sectors. Advancements in online learning now make it easier than ever to gain specialized credentials and accelerate your journey toward your professional goals.

Many students interested in biology may consider healthcare management. For those seeking rapid career advancement, fastest online master's in healthcare administration programs offer a way to quickly develop leadership skills and enter management roles. Similarly, if mental health and patient care appeal to you, the shortest pmhnp program can allow you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner in less time.

Students with a passion for nutrition science can benefit from nutrition degree programs available fully online, which often provide flexible, affordable options to jumpstart a career in dietetics or wellness. For those interested in business, the cheapest online mba in healthcare management programs offer cost-effective routes to combine science expertise with leadership and strategic skills highly valued in today's job market.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Kiehart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles