| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | Current World Ranking | National Ranking | Current National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 43 | 3225 | 3005 | 811 | 726 | 518 | 7107 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel H. Chitwood between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel H. Chitwood published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 30.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 446 publications in 2015. 34 of the 646 publications appeared in the last two years.
646 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 2 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| 2009 | 4 |
| 2010 | 1 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 5 |
| 2013 | 6 |
| 2014 | 6 |
| 2015 | 446 |
| 2016 | 21 |
| 2017 | 20 |
| 2018 | 10 |
| 2019 | 12 |
| 2020 | 16 |
| 2021 | 17 |
| 2022 | 25 |
| 2023 | 14 |
| 2024 | 18 |
| 2025 | 16 |
| Total | 646 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. Chitwood sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 518 publications — 99th percentile
99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 | 518 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel H. Chitwood sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile
52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | 43 |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
Daniel H. Chitwood;Fabio T.S. Nogueira;Miya D. Howell;Taiowa A. Montgomery
Emily J. Warschefsky;Emily J. Warschefsky;Laura L. Klein;Laura L. Klein;Margaret H. Frank;Daniel H. Chitwood
Daniel Koenig;José M. Jiménez-Gómez;Seisuke Kimura;Daniel Fulop
Fabio T.S. Nogueira;Shahinez Madi;Daniel H. Chitwood;Michelle T. Juarez
Daniel H. Chitwood;Marja C. P. Timmermans
Daniel H. Chitwood;Aashish Ranjan;Ciera C. Martinez;Lauren R. Headland
Daniel H. Chitwood;Ravi Kumar;Lauren R. Headland;Aashish Ranjan
Aman Y. Husbands;Daniel H. Chitwood;Yevgeniy Plavskin;Marja C.P. Timmermans
Daniel H. Chitwood;Neelima R. Sinha
Ji-Young Lee;Stuart F Baum;John Alvarez;Amita Patel
Yasunori Ichihashi;José Antonio Aguilar-Martínez;Moran Farhi;Daniel H. Chitwood
Fabio T. S. Nogueira;Daniel H. Chitwood;Daniel H. Chitwood;Shahinez Madi;Kazuhiro Ohtsu
Unknown
Daniel H. Chitwood;Daniel H. Chitwood;Mengjuan Guo;Fabio T. S. Nogueira;Marja C. P. Timmermans;Marja C. P. Timmermans
Daniel H. Chitwood;Susan M. Rundell;Darren Y. Li;Quaneisha L. Woodford
Ryan J. Andres;Viktoriya Coneva;Margaret H. Frank;John R. Tuttle
Daniel H. Chitwood;Laura L. Klein;Regan O'Hanlon;Steven Chacko
Mark C. Wilson;Andrew M. Mutka;Aaron W. Hummel;Jeffrey Berry
Damianos S. Skopelitis;Kristine Hill;Simon Klesen;Cristina F. Marco
Alexander Bucksch;Acheampong Atta-Boateng;Akomian F. Azihou;Dorjsuren Battogtokh
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.