World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
22827
World Ranking
16212
National Ranking
843

Claudia Schoch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Schoch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 322 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Claudia Schoch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claudia Schoch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claudia Schoch is affiliated with the MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory in Germany. Their professional focus is situated within this institution, contributing to the research and clinical activities pertaining to leukemia and related hematological conditions.

There are no listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields, subfields, main topics of work, or awards available for this scientist at this time.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of FLT3 length mutations in 1003 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: correlation to cytogenetics, FAB subtype, and prognosis in the AMLCG study and usefulness as a marker for the detection of minimal residual disease.

    Susanne Schnittger;Claudia Schoch;Martin Dugas;Wolfgang Kern

  • Molecular and chromosomal mechanisms of resistance to imatinib (STI571) therapy.

    A. Hochhaus;S. Kreil;A. S. Corbin;P. La Rosée;P. La Rosée

  • Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favorable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype

    Susanne Schnittger;Claudia Schoch;Wolfgang Kern;Cristina Mecucci

  • AML1-ETO downregulates the granulocytic differentiation factor C/EBPalpha in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia.

    Thomas Pabst;Beatrice U. Mueller;Nari Harakawa;Claudia Schoch

  • KIT-D816 mutations in AML1-ETO-positive AML are associated with impaired event-free and overall survival

    Susanne Schnittger;Tobias M. Kohl;Torsten Haferlach;Wolfgang Kern

  • Double induction strategy for acute myeloid leukemia: the effect of high-dose cytarabine with mitoxantrone instead of standard-dose cytarabine with daunorubicin and 6-thioguanine: a randomized trial by the German AML Cooperative Group.

    Thomas Büchner;Wolfgang Hiddemann;Bernhard Wörmann;Helmut Löffler

  • AML with 11q23/MLL abnormalities as defined by the WHO classification: incidence, partner chromosomes, FAB subtype, age distribution, and prognostic impact in an unselected series of 1897 cytogenetically analyzed AML cases

    Claudia Schoch;Susanne Schnittger;Mirjam Klaus;Wolfgang Kern

  • Diversity and Functional Consequences of Germline and Somatic PTPN11 Mutations in Human Disease

    Marco Tartaglia;Simone Martinelli;Lorenzo Stella;Gianfranco Bocchinfuso

  • Comparison of chromosome banding analysis, interphase- and hypermetaphase-FISH, qualitative and quantitative PCR for diagnosis and for follow-up in chronic myeloid leukemia: a study on 350 cases

    C Schoch;S Schnittger;S Bursch;D Gerstner

  • Implications of NRAS mutations in AML: a study of 2502 patients.

    Ulrike Bacher;Torsten Haferlach;Claudia Schoch;Wolfgang Kern

  • Screening for MLL tandem duplication in 387 unselected patients with AML identify a prognostically unfavorable subset of AML

    S Schnittger;U Kinkelin;C Schoch;A Heinecke

  • Early blast clearance by remission induction therapy is a major independent prognostic factor for both achievement of complete remission and long-term outcome in acute myeloid leukemia: data from the German AML Cooperative Group (AMLCG) 1992 Trial

    Wolfgang Kern;Torsten Haferlach;Claudia Schoch;Helmut Löffler

  • Karyotype is an independent prognostic parameter in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML): an analysis of 93 patients with t-AML in comparison to 1091 patients with de novo AML.

    C Schoch;W Kern;S Schnittger;W Hiddemann

  • The t(8;9)(p22;p24) is a recurrent abnormality in chronic and acute leukemia that fuses PCM1 to JAK2

    Andreas Reiter;Christoph Walz;Ann Watmore;Claudia Schoch

  • Determination of relapse risk based on assessment of minimal residual disease during complete remission by multiparameter flow cytometry in unselected patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

    Wolfgang Kern;Daniela Voskova;Claudia Schoch;Wolfgang Hiddemann

  • Management of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Elderly Patients

    Wolfgang Hiddemann;Wolfgang Kern;Claudia Schoch;Christa Fonatsch

  • Acute myeloid leukemias with reciprocal rearrangements can be distinguished by specific gene expression profiles.

    Claudia Schoch;Alexander Kohlmann;Alexander Kohlmann;Susanne Schnittger;Susanne Schnittger;Benedikt Brors;Benedikt Brors

  • The myeloid master regulator transcription factor PU.1 is inactivated by AML1-ETO in t(8;21) myeloid leukemia.

    Rajani K. Vangala;Marion S. Heiss-Neumann;Marion S. Heiss-Neumann;Janki S. Rangatia;Janki S. Rangatia;Sheo M. Singh;Sheo M. Singh

  • Global approach to the diagnosis of leukemia using gene expression profiling.

    Torsten Haferlach;Alexander Kohlmann;Susanne Schnittger;Martin Dugas

  • The MLL recombinome of acute leukemias.

    C. Meyer;B. Schneider;S. Jakob;S. Strehl

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Kern
Wolfgang Kern Munich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany)
Susanne Schnittger
Susanne Schnittger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Torsten Haferlach
Torsten Haferlach MLL Munich Leukemia Laboratory
Wolfgang Hiddemann
Wolfgang Hiddemann Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Martin Dugas
Martin Dugas Heidelberg University
Achim Heinecke
Achim Heinecke University of Münster
Andreas Hochhaus
Andreas Hochhaus Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Wolfgang E. Berdel
Wolfgang E. Berdel University of Münster
Rüdiger Hehlmann
Rüdiger Hehlmann Heidelberg University
Andreas Reiter
Andreas Reiter Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Medicine or healthcare, numerous online degree options can help you get started or advance professionally. For those looking to quickly enter the nursing field, fast track lpn programs online provide a streamlined path into patient care as a Licensed Practical Nurse.

For those interested in specialized mental health roles, pmhnp online programs can prepare you for work as a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner, a rapidly growing profession. If administration and leadership appeal to you, a bachelors in healthcare administration offers foundational knowledge to enter management positions.

For professionals seeking to move into higher leadership roles or policy-making areas, choosing one of the cheapest online mha programs allows for affordable graduate-level training. These flexible online pathways are ideal for balancing studies with work, making them accessible routes to rewarding healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Claudia Schoch

Recently Published Articles