World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
5193
World Ranking
7118
National Ranking
2399

Chad S. Boyd publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad S. Boyd sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Chad S. Boyd D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chad S. Boyd sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Chad S. Boyd is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of environmental science, with a focus on ecology and rangeland management. Their research encompasses a range of topics related to ecosystem dynamics, vegetation, and land management practices.

The scientist's recent publications include works on landscape and ecological processes, specifically addressing challenges in rangeland and dryland environments. Notable papers include:

  • Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty, 2021, published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts, 2021, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • The elevational ascent and spread of exotic annual grass dominance in the Great Basin, USA, 2021, published in Diversity and Distributions
  • Living with exotic annual grasses in the sagebrush ecosystem, 2021, published in Journal of Environmental Management
  • A sagebrush conservation design to proactively restore America's sagebrush biome, 2022, published in Antarctica A Keystone in a Changing World

Their frequent coauthors include Kirk W. Davies, Owen W. Baughman, Jon D. Bates, David E. Naugle, and Lauren N. Svejcar, indicating a collaborative research network centered on rangeland ecology and conservation.

Chad S. Boyd has published predominantly in specialized venues related to rangeland and restoration science. The primary venues where their work appears are:

  • Rangeland Ecology & Management
  • Restoration Ecology
  • Rangelands
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution

Their research contributions primarily fall under the field of Environmental Science, with significant focus on the subfields of Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Environmental Chemistry, and Plant Science.

Their main areas of work include:

  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Turfgrass Adaptation and Management
  • Seedling growth and survival studies
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Weed Control and Herbicide Applications

Best Publications

  • Saving the sagebrush sea: An ecosystem conservation plan for big sagebrush plant communities

    Kirk W. Davies;Chad S. Boyd;Jeffrey L. Beck;Jon D. Bates

  • Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat

    John A. Crawford;Rich A. Olson;Neil E. West;Jeffrey C. Mosley

  • Innovation in rangeland monitoring: annual, 30 m, plant functional type percent cover maps for U.S. rangelands, 1984–2017

    Matthew O. Jones;Brady W. Allred;David E. Naugle;Jeremy D. Maestas

  • Improving Landsat predictions of rangeland fractional cover with multitask learning and uncertainty

    Brady W. Allred;Brandon T. Bestelmeyer;Chad S. Boyd;Christopher Brown

  • Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts.

    Nancy Shackelford;Nancy Shackelford;Gustavo B. Paterno;Gustavo B. Paterno;Daniel E. Winkler;Todd E. Erickson

  • Emerging seed enhancement technologies for overcoming barriers to restoration

    Matthew D. Madsen;Kirk W. Davies;Chad S. Boyd;Jay D. Kerby

  • Challenges and limitations to native species restoration in the Great Basin, USA

    Tony Svejcar;Chad Boyd;Kirk Davies;Erik Hamerlynck

  • Managing Complex Problems in Rangeland Ecosystems

    Chad S. Boyd;Tony J. Svejcar

  • Effects of Long-Term Livestock Grazing on Fuel Characteristics in Rangelands: An Example From the Sagebrush Steppe

    Kirk W. Davies;Jonathan D. Bates;Tony J. Svejcar;Chad S. Boyd

  • Using Resilience and Resistance Concepts to Manage Persistent Threats to Sagebrush Ecosystems and Greater Sage-Grouse

    Jeanne C. Chambers;Jeremy D. Maestas;David A. Pyke;Chad S. Boyd

  • The elevational ascent and spread of exotic annual grass dominance in the Great Basin, USA

    Joseph T. Smith;Brady W. Allred;Chad S. Boyd;Kirk W. Davies

  • Winter grazing can reduce wildfire size, intensity and behaviour in a shrub-grassland

    Kirk W. Davies;Chad S. Boyd;Jon D. Bates;April Hulet

  • Restoring the Sagebrush Component in Crested Wheatgrass–Dominated Communities

    Kirk W. Davies;Chad S. Boyd;Aleta M. Nafus

  • Living with exotic annual grasses in the sagebrush ecosystem.

    Kirk W. Davies;Elizabeth A. Leger;Chad S. Boyd;Lauren M. Hallett

  • Shrub Microsite Influences Post-Fire Perennial Grass Establishment

    Chad S. Boyd;Kirk W. Davies

  • A sagebrush conservation design to proactively restore America’s sagebrush biome

    Unknown

  • Effects of feral free‐roaming horses on semi‐arid rangeland ecosystems: an example from the sagebrush steppe

    Kirk W. Davies;G. Collins;C. S. Boyd

  • Site, Competition, and Plant Stock Influence Transplant Success of Wyoming Big Sagebrush

    J. Kent McAdoo;Chad S. Boyd;Roger L. Sheley

  • Evaluating a seed technology for sagebrush restoration across an elevation gradient: Support for bet hedging

    K.W. Davies;C.S. Boyd;M.D. Madsen;J. Kerby

  • The influence of plant removal on succession in Wyoming big sagebrush

    C.S. Boyd;T.J. Svejcar

  • Using resistance and resilience concepts to reduce impacts of invasive annual grasses and altered fire regimes on the sagebrush ecosystem and greater sage-grouse: A strategic multi-scale approach

    Jeanne C. Chambers;David A. Pyke;Jeremy D. Maestas;Mike Pellant

  • Synthesis Paper Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat

    John A. Crawford;Rich A. Olson;Neil E. West;Jeffrey C. Mosley

Frequent Co-Authors

Kirk W. Davies
Kirk W. Davies United States Department of Agriculture
Tony J. Svejcar
Tony J. Svejcar Oregon State University
David E. Naugle
David E. Naugle University of Montana
Brady W. Allred
Brady W. Allred University of Montana
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf
Samuel D. Fuhlendorf Oklahoma State University
Roger L. Sheley
Roger L. Sheley Agricultural Research Service
Jeanne C. Chambers
Jeanne C. Chambers US Forest Service
Richard F. Miller
Richard F. Miller Oregon State University
Brandon T. Bestelmeyer
Brandon T. Bestelmeyer Agricultural Research Service
David M. Engle
David M. Engle Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse career paths, including healthcare, education, and research. For those interested in healthcare, online learning pathways offer flexibility for gaining essential credentials. If you're considering a fast track to nursing, accelerated bsn programs for non nurses provide an efficient route for career changers, letting individuals transition into nursing without prior experience.

Already an RN? You can advance your qualifications through rn to bsn in 6 months programs, designed for working professionals seeking to enhance their credentials in a short period. Moving up the ladder, learning how to become a nurse practitioner introduces another pathway, often involving specialized training and advanced degrees.

As you consider specialty areas, understanding compensation is key. Explore the demand and earning potential for roles such as a psychiatric nurse practitioner, including a breakdown by location, with psychiatric nurse practitioner salary. These flexible online options can make career changes or advancement more accessible as you explore related fields to Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Chad S. Boyd

Trending Scientists