World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 47 4508 4351 115 110 95 6566

Frank Götmark publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank Götmark between 1980 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank Götmark published across 45 years, from 1980 to 2024, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2008. 7 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2008. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication
1980 2024

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank Götmark: publications per year, 1980 to 2024
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 2
1985 0
1986 2
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 1
1991 0
1992 6
1993 3
1994 3
1995 2
1996 2
1997 4
1998 0
1999 0
2000 2
2001 0
2002 1
2003 1
2004 4
2005 5
2006 4
2007 4
2008 7
2009 4
2010 1
2011 2
2012 3
2013 2
2014 2
2015 4
2016 1
2017 3
2018 1
2019 4
2020 3
2021 2
2022 4
2023 6
2024 1
Total 105
Download as CSV

Frank Götmark publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Götmark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 92–96 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 95 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240 95
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Frank Götmark D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Götmark sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213 47
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Frank Götmark is affiliated with the University of Gothenburg in Sweden. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Environmental Science, with an emphasis on Global Maternal and Child Health, Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences, and species-related ecological studies. Their body of work covers several subfields, including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Global and Planetary Change, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, and Ecological Modeling.

The scientist has contributed to multiple recent papers, notably:

  • Human fertility in relation to education, economy, religion, contraception, and family planning programs (2020), published in BMC Public Health
  • Population growth and climate change: Addressing the overlooked threat multiplier (2020), published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity loss and smaller human populations are necessary to preserve what is left (2022), published in Biological Conservation
  • Where are we now with European forest multi-taxon biodiversity and where can we head to? (2023), published in Biological Conservation
  • Population growth, family planning and the Paris Agreement: an assessment of the nationally determined contributions (NDCs) (2022), published in International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics

Götmark frequently collaborates with other researchers. Some of their frequent co-authors include:

  • Philip Cafaro
  • Pernilla Hansson
  • Sabina Burrascano
  • Francesco Chianucci
  • Giovanni Trentanovi

The scientist's publications often appear in venues related to conservation and ecological research. Prominent publication forums include:

  • Biological Conservation
  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • BMC Public Health
  • The Science of The Total Environment

Their research topics encompass issues related to biodiversity and forest ecology, the interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and plants, as well as family dynamics and climate change methodologies. Specific topics addressed include:

  • Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Climate Change and Geoengineering

Best Publications

  • Relative importance of coarse and fine woody debris for the diversity of wood-inhabiting fungi in temperate broadleaf forests

    Björn Nordén;Martin Ryberg;Frank Götmark;Bettina Olausson

  • The Effects of Investigator Disturbance on Nesting Birds

    Frank Götmark

  • Nest site selection : a trade-off between concealment and view of the surroundings ?

    Frank Gotmark;Donald Blomqvist;Olof C. Johansson;Jan Bergkvist

  • Parental quality and egg size affect chick survival in a precocial bird, the lapwing Vanellus vanellus.

    Donald Blomqvist;O. C. Johansson;Frank Götmark

  • Prey Selection by Sparrowhawks, Accipiter nisus: Relative Predation Risk for Breeding Passerine Birds in Relation to their Size, Ecology and Behaviour

    Frank Gotmark;Peter Post

  • Flock-feeding on fish schools increases individual success in gulls.

    Frank Götmark;David W. Winkler;David W. Winkler;Malte Andersson

  • Colonial breeding reduces nest predation in the common gull (Larus canus)

    Frank Götmark;Malte Andersson

  • Dead wood in semi-natural temperate broadleaved woodland: contribution of coarse and fine dead wood, attached dead wood and stumps

    Björn Nordén;Frank Götmark;Marie Tönnberg;Martin Ryberg

  • Factors and scales potentially important for saproxylic beetles in temperate mixed oak forest

    Niklas Franc;Frank Götmark;Bjørn Økland;Björn Nordén

  • Protected Areas in Sweden: Is Natural Variety Adequately Represented?

    Christer Nilsson;Frank Götmark

  • Habitat management alternatives for conservation forests in the temperate zone: Review, synthesis, and implications

    Frank Götmark

  • At which spatial and temporal scales does landscape context affect local density of Red Data Book and Indicator species

    Heidi Paltto;Björn Nordén;Frank Götmark;Niklas Franc

  • Broadleaved tree species in conifer-dominated forestry: Regeneration and limitation of saplings in southern Sweden

    Frank Götmark;Jonas Fridman;Göran Kempe;Björn Norden

  • Why Be a Shrub? A Basic Model and Hypotheses for the Adaptive Values of a Common Growth Form

    Frank Götmark;Elin Götmark;Anna M. Jensen

  • Overpopulation is a major cause of biodiversity loss and smaller human populations are necessary to preserve what is left

    Unknown

  • Are Indices Reliable for Assessing Conservation Value of Natural Areas? An Avian Case Study

    Frank Götmark;Matti Åhlund;Mats O.G. Eriksson

  • Predation by sparrowhawks favours early breeding and small broods in great tits

    Frank Götmark

  • Evaluating partial cutting in broadleaved temperate forest under strong experimental control: Short-term effects on herbaceous plants

    Frank Götmark;Heidi Paltto;Björn Nordén;Elin Götmark

  • Anti-predator effect of conspicuous plumage in a male bird

    Frank Götmark

  • Bright Male Plumage and Predation Risk in Passerine Birds: Are Males Easier to Detect Than Females?

    Frank Götmark;Annika Hohlfält

  • Do Field Observers Attract Nest Predators and Influence Nesting Success of Common Eiders

    Frank Gotmark;Matti Ahlund

  • Conspicuous Coloration in Male Birds is Favoured by Predation in Some Species and Disfavoured in Others

    Frank Gotmark

Frequent Co-Authors

Malte Andersson
Malte Andersson University of Gothenburg
Magnus Löf
Magnus Löf Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Igor Drobyshev
Igor Drobyshev Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
David W. Winkler
David W. Winkler Cornell University
Christer Nilsson
Christer Nilsson Umeå University
Donald Blomqvist
Donald Blomqvist University of Gothenburg
Per Milberg
Per Milberg Linköping University
Nils Ryman
Nils Ryman Stockholm University
Matts Lindbladh
Matts Lindbladh Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Kristoffer Hylander
Kristoffer Hylander Stockholm University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to various interdisciplinary fields, especially when combined with psychology-focused qualifications. Many students seek flexible learning options, and online psychology degrees offer accessible pathways to broaden your expertise.

If your interests extend to the intersection of environmental and psychological sciences, consider an online master in clinical psychology. This qualification can help you understand how environmental factors impact mental health. Similarly, those interested in supporting young people might explore an online child psychology degree, which prepares graduates for roles in both education and healthcare settings.

For those looking for affordability, there are cheapest masters in counseling programs. These can lead to counseling careers that benefit from an ecology and evolution background, including guidance on environmental stress or trauma. Additionally, professionals interested in law, policy, or research might look into high paying jobs in forensic psychology, where knowledge of human and environmental interactions is valuable.

Combining ecology and evolution with psychology equips graduates for diverse, impactful career paths in science, healthcare, and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Götmark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles