World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10871 10174 5686 5191 65 4705

M. Douglas Ris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. Douglas Ris between 1978 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. Douglas Ris published across 45 years, from 1978 to 2022, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2020. 4 of the 87 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2020. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 3 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 2 publications
1978 2022

87 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. Douglas Ris: publications per year, 1978 to 2022
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 2
1995 3
1996 3
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 0
2001 4
2002 3
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 1
2007 4
2008 4
2009 0
2010 2
2011 1
2012 1
2013 2
2014 4
2015 1
2016 2
2017 5
2018 6
2019 5
2020 9
2021 2
2022 2
Total 87
Download as CSV

M. Douglas Ris publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Douglas Ris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 65 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 65
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

M. Douglas Ris D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Douglas Ris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

M. Douglas Ris is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Oncology, and Molecular Biology.

The main topics of their scientific work cover:

  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • ATP Synthase and ATPases Research
  • Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being

Their recent scholarly publications include:

  • "Long-term cognitive and academic outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy" (2021) published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • "Neuropsychological functioning following surgery for pediatric low-grade glioma: a prospective longitudinal study" (2020) published in Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics
  • "Cognitive predictors of social adjustment in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with photon versus proton radiation therapy" (2022) published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • "Treatment age and neurocognitive outcomes following proton beam radiotherapy for pediatric low- and intermediate-grade gliomas" (2021) published in Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • "A Prospective Evaluation of Fatigue in Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients Treated With Radiation Therapy" (2022) published in Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nursing

The frequent co-authors with whom Ris has collaborated include:

  • M. Fatih Okcu
  • Murali Chintagumpala
  • Lisa S. Kahalley
  • David R. Grosshans
  • Arnold C. Paulino

The venues where M. Douglas Ris has most often published are:

  • Pediatric Blood & Cancer
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics
  • Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nursing
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology

In 2011, Ris was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA).

Best Publications

  • Association of prenatal and childhood blood lead concentrations with criminal arrests in early adulthood.

    John Paul Wright;Kim N Dietrich;M. Douglas Ris;Richard W Hornung

  • Mood and global-local visual processing

    Michael R. Basso;Bruce K. Schefft;M. Douglas Ris;William N. Dember

  • Long-term neurobehavioral outcome in pediatric brain-tumor patients: Review and methodological critique

    M. D. Ris;R. B. Noll

  • Pediatric Neuropsychology : Research, Theory, and Practice

    Keith Owen Yeates;M. Douglas Ris;H. Gerry Taylor

  • Cognitive and Adaptive Outcome in Low-Grade Pediatric Cerebellar Astrocytomas: Evidence of Diminished Cognitive and Adaptive Functioning in National Collaborative Research Studies (CCG 9891/POG 9130)

    Dean W. Beebe;M. Douglas Ris;F. Daniel Armstrong;John Fontanesi

  • Early exposure to lead and neuropsychological outcome in adolescence

    M. Douglas Ris;Kim N. Dietrich;Paul A. Succop;Omer G. Berger

  • The association between sleep disordered breathing, academic grades, and cognitive and behavioral functioning among overweight subjects during middle to late childhood.

    Dean W. Beebe;M. Douglas Ris;Megan E. Kramer;Elizabeth Long

  • Early-treated phenylketonuria: adult neuropsychologic outcome.

    M.Douglas Ris;Sharon E. Williams;Melanie M. Hunt;Helen K. Berry

  • The impact of early childhood lead exposure on brain organization: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of language function.

    Weihong Yuan;Scott K. Holland;Kim M. Cecil;Kim N. Dietrich

  • Intellectual and academic outcome following two chemotherapy regimens and radiotherapy for average-risk medulloblastoma: COG A9961.

    M. Douglas Ris;Karin S. Walsh;Dana Wallace;Dana Wallace;F. Daniel Armstrong

  • Cognitive and Adaptive Outcome in Extracerebellar Low-Grade Brain Tumors in Children: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

    M. Douglas Ris;Dean W. Beebe;F. Daniel Armstrong;John Fontanesi

  • Neuropsychological Functioning of Youths With Sickle Cell Disease: Comparison With Non-Chronically Ill Peers

    Robert B. Noll;Laura Stith;Maria A. Gartstein;M. Douglas Ris

  • Social interactions between children with cancer or sickle cell disease and their peers: teacher ratings.

    Robert Noll;M. Ris;W. Davies;William Bukowski

  • Academic and cognitive abilities in children of parents with bipolar disorder: a test of the nonverbal learning disability model

    Patricia McDonough-Ryan;Melissa P Delbello;Paula K Shear;Douglas M Ris

  • Recovery in pediatric brain injury: is psychostimulant medication beneficial?

    Sharon E. Williams;M Douglas Ris;Rita Ayyangar;Bruce K. Scheffi

  • IMPACT OF NIGHT-FLOAT ROTATION ON SLEEP, MOOD, AND ALERTNESS: THE RESIDENT'S PERCEPTION

    Anita Cavallo;Julie Jaskiewicz;M Douglas Ris

  • Detecting neuropsychological malingering: effects of coaching and information

    Thomas M Dunn;Paula K Shear;Steven Howe;M Douglas Ris;M Douglas Ris

  • Attention, processing speed, and executive functioning in pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton beam radiation therapy

    Tanya N. Antonini;M. Douglas Ris;David R. Grosshans;Anita Mahajan

  • The night float paradigm to decrease sleep deprivation: good solution or a new problem?

    Anita Cavallo;M. Douglas Ris;Paul Succop

  • Relationship of Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Perfusion, and Other Disease Factors to Neuropsychological Outcome in Sickle Cell Disease

    Royal Grueneich;M. Douglas Ris;William Ball;Karen A. Kalinyak

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith Owen Yeates
Keith Owen Yeates University of Calgary
E. Mark Mahone
E. Mark Mahone Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Dean W. Beebe
Dean W. Beebe Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Eric Bouffet
Eric Bouffet University of Toronto
Michael D. Taylor
Michael D. Taylor University of Toronto
Vijay Ramaswamy
Vijay Ramaswamy University of Toronto
Robert T. Ammerman
Robert T. Ammerman Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Robert B. Noll
Robert B. Noll University of Pittsburgh
Roger J. Packer
Roger J. Packer Children’s National Health System
Steven Paul Woods
Steven Paul Woods University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees provides flexible options for students pursuing diverse career paths. Choosing the right program can be challenging, especially when considering both academic quality and affordability. Many students are looking for programs that balance reputable training with accessible tuition rates.

For those interested in counseling, there are several highly regarded options across the country. In Illinois, students can consider affordable counseling degrees in Illinois that allow graduates to progress into roles such as school counselors or clinical practitioners. Similarly, those seeking the cheapest counseling degrees in Indiana can find programs tailored for aspiring mental health professionals.

Regional affordability is also a key factor for students in urban areas. Accessing the cheapest counseling degrees in Los Angeles is an excellent starting point for those wanting to work in diverse metropolitan communities. Additionally, affordable counseling degrees in Michigan cater to students pursuing licensure or roles in educational and healthcare settings.

By comparing these online degree options, students can choose programs that meet their budget, lifestyle, and career goals. Whether aiming for clinical practice or research, taking time to explore accredited, cost-effective pathways is essential for a successful psychology career in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing M. Douglas Ris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles