World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
50
Citations
9383
World Ranking
3854
National Ranking
1349

Richard F. Miller publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard F. Miller sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 151 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Richard F. Miller D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard F. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1934 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard F. Miller is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with significant contributions in subfields such as ecology, global and planetary change, nature and landscape conservation, environmental chemistry, and genetics.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to ecosystem dynamics and management. Their main research themes include:

  • Rangeland and wildlife management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Turfgrass adaptation and management
  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Genetic diversity and population structure

Miller has published research articles in various venues, with a focus on ecological and fire ecology-related journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Fire Ecology
  • Ecosphere
  • Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)

Notable recent papers authored or coauthored by Richard F. Miller include:

  • Long-term effects of tree expansion and reduction on soil climate in a semiarid ecosystem, 2020, Ecosphere
  • Sagebrush recovery patterns after fuel treatments mediated by disturbance type and plant functional group interactions, 2021, Ecosphere
  • Review of fuel treatment effects on fuels, fire behavior and ecological resilience in sagebrush (Artemisia spp.) ecosystems in the Western U.S., 2024, Fire Ecology
  • Retrospective analysis reveals high nest survival of syntopic Saltmarsh Sparrow (Ammospiza caudacuta) and Seaside Sparrow (A. maritima) in well-conserved low marsh habitat in 1977-1980, 2025, Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich)
  • Major changes in climate, vegetation, and ecological resilience in recent decades suggest climate smart management strategies for western US dryland shrublands and woodlands, 2025, Fire Ecology

The scientist has collaborated extensively with several researchers, frequently coauthoring with:

  • Jeanne C. Chambers
  • Alexandra K. Urza
  • Matthew C. Reeves
  • Bruce A. Roundy
  • Robin J. Tausch

Richard F. Miller has received recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in the years 1934 and 2012.

Best Publications

  • Fire history and western juniper encroachment in sagebrush steppe

    Richard F. Miller;Jeffrey A. Rose

  • HOLOCENE CHANGES IN SEMIARID PINYON-JUNIPER WOODLANDS

    Richard F. Miller;Peter E. Wigand

  • Resilience to Stress and Disturbance, and Resistance to Bromus tectorum L. Invasion in Cold Desert Shrublands of Western North America

    Jeanne C. Chambers;Bethany A. Bradley;Cynthia S. Brown;Carla D'Antonio

  • Historical and Modern Disturbance Regimes, Stand Structures, and Landscape Dynamics in Piñon–Juniper Vegetation of the Western United States

    William H. Romme;Craig D. Allen;John D. Bailey;William L. Baker

  • Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat

    John A. Crawford;Rich A. Olson;Neil E. West;Jeffrey C. Mosley

  • Impacts of western juniper on plant community composition and structure

    Richard F. Miller;Tony J. Svejcar;Jeffrey A. Rose

  • Ecological effects of large fires on US landscapes: benefit or catastrophe?

    Robert E. Keane;James K. Agee;Peter Fule;Jon E. Keeley

  • Characteristics of Sagebrush Habitats and Limitations to Long-Term Conservation

    Richard F. Miller;Steven T. Knick;David A. Pyke;Cara W. Meinke

  • Resilience and Resistance of Sagebrush Ecosystems: Implications for State and Transition Models and Management Treatments

    Jeanne C. Chambers;Richard F. Miller;David I. Board;David A. Pyke

  • The effects of precipitation timing on sagebrush steppe vegetation

    J.D. Bates;T. Svejcar;R.F. Miller;R.A. Angell

  • Historic expansion of Juniperus occidentalis (western juniper) in southeastern Oregon

    Richard F. Miller;Jeffery A. Rose

  • A review of fire effects on vegetation and soils in the Great Basin Region: response and ecological site characteristics

    Richard F. Miller;Jeanne C. Chambers;David A. Pyke;Fred B. Pierson

  • Implications of livestock grazing in the intermountain sagebrush region: plant composition.

    R. F. Miller;T. J. Svejcar;N. E. West;M. Vavra

  • Predictive modeling and mapping sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) nesting habitat using Maximum Entropy and a long-term dataset from Southern Oregon

    Andrew C. Yost;Steven L. Petersen;Michael Gregg;Richard Miller

  • Competition for Resources Between Understory Vegetation and Overstory Pinus Ponderosa in Northeastern Oregon.

    Gregg M. Riegel;Richard F. Miller;William C. Krueger

  • Spatial and temporal changes of sage grouse habitat in the sagebrush biome

    Richard F. Miller;Lee Eddleman

  • Understory dynamics in cut and uncut western juniper woodlands

    Jon D. Bates;Richard F. Miller;Tony J. Svejcar

  • Age Structure and Expansion of Piñon-Juniper Woodlands: A Regional Perspective in the Intermountain West

    Richard F. Miller;Robin J. Tausch;E. Durant McArthur;Dustin D. Johnson

  • Cattle Distribution on Mountain Rangeland in Northeastern Oregon.

    R. L. Gillen;W. C. Krueger;R. F. Miller

  • Vegetation Characteristics Across Part of the Wyoming Big Sagebrush Alliance

    Kirk Davies;Jonathan Bates;Richard Miller

  • Synthesis Paper Ecology and management of sage-grouse and sage-grouse habitat

    John A. Crawford;Rich A. Olson;Neil E. West;Jeffrey C. Mosley

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeanne C. Chambers
Jeanne C. Chambers US Forest Service
Tony J. Svejcar
Tony J. Svejcar Oregon State University
Bruce A. Roundy
Bruce A. Roundy Brigham Young University
David A. Pyke
David A. Pyke United States Geological Survey
Kirk W. Davies
Kirk W. Davies United States Department of Agriculture
Michael J. Wisdom
Michael J. Wisdom US Forest Service
Peter J. Weisberg
Peter J. Weisberg University of Nevada Reno
William H. Romme
William H. Romme Colorado State University
Brandon T. Bestelmeyer
Brandon T. Bestelmeyer Agricultural Research Service
Thomas W. Swetnam
Thomas W. Swetnam University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse pathways, from research and teaching to environmental consulting. As the demand for flexible education grows, more students are choosing online degrees. It's essential to compare options carefully—for example, degrees like those in nursing have comprehensive resources such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn to help students weigh accreditation, cost, and curriculum.

For those considering advancement in related sciences or healthcare fields, accelerated programs like rn to msn bridge programs can offer affordable and streamlined options to earn higher degrees. As you explore schools, selecting from non profit online colleges can ensure a focus on quality and reputation rather than solely profit.

Military veterans and active-duty personnel looking to study Ecology and Evolution can benefit from choosing online military friendly colleges that offer unique support and flexible policies tailored to their needs. Carefully exploring all these online degree paths will help you find the right fit for your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Richard F. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles