World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
4802
World Ranking
10223
National Ranking
93

Céline Darnon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Céline Darnon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Céline Darnon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Céline Darnon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The Experience of Low-SES Students in Higher Education: Psychological Barriers to Success and Interventions to Reduce Social-Class Inequality

    Mickaël Jury;Annique Smeding;Nicole M. Stephens;Jessica E. Nelson

  • Why lockdown and distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to increase the social class achievement gap.

    Sébastien Goudeau;Camille Sanrey;Arnaud Stanczak;Antony Manstead

  • Achievement Goals in Social Interactions: Learning with Mastery vs. Performance Goals

    Céline Darnon;Céline Darnon;Fabrizio Butera;Judith M. Harackiewicz

  • Achievement goal promotion at university: Social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals

    Céline Darnon;Benoît Dompnier;Florian Delmas;Caroline Pulfrey

  • Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation

    Céline Darnon;Dominique Muller;Sheree M. Schrager;Nelly Pannuzzo

  • Performance-Approach and Performance-Avoidance Goals: When Uncertainty Makes a Difference

    Céline Darnon;Judith M. Harackiewicz;Fabrizio Butera;Gabriel Mugny

  • Conflict Elaboration and Cognitive Outcomes

    Céline Buchs;Fabrizio Butera;Gabriel Mugny;Céline Darnon

  • Toward a More Social Understanding of Achievement Goals The Interpersonal Effects of Mastery and Performance Goals

    P. Marijn Poortvliet;Céline Darnon

  • Autonomy and task performance: Explaining the impact of grades on intrinsic motivation.

    Caroline Pulfrey;Céline Darnon;Fabrizio Butera

  • Buts d'accomplissement, stratégies d'étude et motivation intrinsèque : Présentation d'un domaine de recherche et validation française de l'échelle D'Elliot et Mcgregor (2001).

    Céline Darnon;Fabrizio Butera

  • From social class to self-efficacy: internalization of low social status pupils’ school performance

    Virginie Wiederkehr;Céline Darnon;Céline Darnon;Sébastien Chazal;Serge Guimond

  • The interplay of mastery and performance goals in social comparison: A multiple-goal perspective.

    Céline Darnon;Benoît Dompnier;Ophélie Gilliéron;Fabrizio Butera

  • Reducing the socio-economic status achievement gap at University by promoting mastery-oriented assessment.

    Annique Smeding;Céline Darnon;Carine Souchal;Marie-Christine Toczek-Capelle

  • Faking the Desire to Learn A Clarification of the Link Between Mastery Goals and Academic Achievement

    Benoît Dompnier;Céline Darnon;Fabrizio Butera

  • “Too complex for me!” Why do performance-approach and performance-avoidance goals predict exam performance?

    Céline Darnon;Fabrizio Butera;Gabriel Mugny;Alain Quiamzade

  • Achievement goals in educational contexts: A social psychology perspective

    Celine Darnon;Benoit Dompnier;P. Marijn Poortvliet

  • When first-generation students succeed at university: On the link between social class, academic performance, and performance-avoidance goals

    Mickaël Jury;Annique Smeding;Martine Court;Céline Darnon

  • Conflits et apprentissage. Régulation des conflits sociocognitifs et apprentissage

    Céline Buchs;Céline Darnon;Alain Quiamzade;Gabriel Mugny

  • First-generation students’ underperformance at university: the impact of the function of selection

    Unknown

  • Des conflits pour apprendre

    Céline Darnon;Fabrizio Butera;Gabriel Mugny

Frequent Co-Authors

Fabrizio Butera
Fabrizio Butera University of Lausanne
Gabriel Mugny
Gabriel Mugny University of Geneva
Judith M. Harackiewicz
Judith M. Harackiewicz University of Wisconsin–Madison
Serge Guimond
Serge Guimond University of Clermont Auvergne
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester
Nico W. Van Yperen
Nico W. Van Yperen University of Groningen
Olivier Klein
Olivier Klein Université Libre de Bruxelles
Pascal Huguet
Pascal Huguet University of Clermont Auvergne
Nicole M. Stephens
Nicole M. Stephens Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Céline Darnon

Recently Published Articles