World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cecil C. Konijnendijk

Cecil C. Konijnendijk

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
49
Citations
11558
World Ranking
5162
National Ranking
216

Cecil C. Konijnendijk publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecil C. Konijnendijk sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Cecil C. Konijnendijk D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cecil C. Konijnendijk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: A review

    Unknown

  • Defining urban forestry – A comparative perspective of North America and Europe

    Unknown

  • Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: A review of empirical evidence

    Unknown

  • A decade of urban forestry in Europe

    Unknown

  • Nature-based solutions for resilient landscapes and cities.

    Raffaele Lafortezza;Raffaele Lafortezza;Jiquan Chen;Cecil Konijnendijk van den Bosch;Thomas B. Randrup

  • Urban Forests and Trees

    Cecil Konijnendijk;Kjell Nilsson;Thomas Randrup;Jasper Schipperijn

  • A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces – A systematic review

    Unknown

  • Advancing urban green infrastructure in Europe: Outcomes and reflections from the GREEN SURGE project

    Stephan Pauleit;Stephan Pauleit;Bianca Ambrose-Oji;Erik Andersson;Barbara Anton

  • Green Infrastructure as a tool to support spatial planning in European urban regions

    Raffaele Lafortezza;Clive Davies;Giovanni Sanesi;Cecil C. Konijnendijk

  • Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: Introducing the 3–30–300 rule

    Unknown

  • The forest and the city

    Unknown

  • Human and biophysical legacies shape contemporary urban forests: A literature synthesis

    Lara A. Roman;Hamil Pearsall;Theodore S. Eisenman;Tenley M. Conway

  • Communication between science, policy and citizens in public participation in urban forestry—Experiences from the Neighbourwoods project

    Unknown

  • Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries

    Ole Mertz;Helle Munk Ravnborg;Gabor L. Lövei;Ivan Nielsen

  • Urban tree diversity—Taking stock and looking ahead

    Unknown

  • Integrating solutions to adapt cities for climate change

    Brenda B Lin;Alessandro Ossola;Alessandro Ossola;Alessandro Ossola;Marina Alberti;Erik Andersson;Erik Andersson

  • Urban forest governance: Towards a framework for comparing approaches

    Unknown

  • Adapting forestry to urban demands — role of communication in urban forestry in Europe

    Unknown

  • The Impact of COVID-19 on Public Space: A Review of the Emerging Questions

    Jordi Honey-Roses;Isabelle Anguelovski;Josep Bohigas;Vincent Chireh

  • Citizens’ perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: Results from selected Southeast European cities

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Jasper Schipperijn
Jasper Schipperijn University of Southern Denmark
Dagmar Haase
Dagmar Haase Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Raffaele Lafortezza
Raffaele Lafortezza University of Bari Aldo Moro
Susan Parnell
Susan Parnell University of Cape Town
Erik Andersson
Erik Andersson Karolinska Institute
Brenda B. Lin
Brenda B. Lin Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Harini Nagendra
Harini Nagendra Azim Premji University
Marina Alberti
Marina Alberti University of Washington
Xuemei Bai
Xuemei Bai Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to various related fields that complement this area of study. For students looking for flexible and cost-effective options, exploring the cheapest online general studies degree programs can be a good starting point. These programs often provide broad foundational knowledge while keeping expenses low.

For those who prefer streamlined academic paths, considering some of the easiest bachelor degree options may help balance workload and career goals without compromising essential skills required in environmental roles.

Specialized fields such as geology are highly relevant to Environmental Sciences. To deepen expertise in earth processes, students can explore reputable online geology programs. These prepare graduates for careers in resource management, environmental consulting, and research.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) have become indispensable in environmental analysis and decision-making. Top best GIS graduate programs integrate spatial data techniques crucial for career advancement in conservation, urban planning, and hazard assessment.

Best Scientists Citing Cecil C. Konijnendijk

Recently Published Articles