World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
103
Citations
45037
World Ranking
1302
National Ranking
761

Cam Patterson publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cam Patterson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 379 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Cam Patterson D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cam Patterson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cam Patterson is affiliated with the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences in the United States. Their research spans primarily the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Neuroscience. Within these domains, their work is focused on several subfields including Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Biophysics.

The core topics of their research emphasize Retinal Development and Disorders, Cellular transport and secretion, Mitochondrial Function and Pathology, Glaucoma and retinal disorders, Photoreceptor and optogenetics research, Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques, and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms.

The scientist has contributed to multiple papers published in various venues, with recent notable publications including:

  • DNA and RNA oxidative damage in the retina is associated with ganglion cell mitochondria, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • The effect of Rbfox2 modulation on retinal transcriptome and visual function, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Loss of Rbfox1 Does Not Affect Survival of Retinal Ganglion Cells Injured by Optic Nerve Crush, 2021, Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Visual Function and Survival of Injured Retinal Ganglion Cells in Aged Rbfox1 Knockout Animals, 2022, Cells
  • Rbfox1 expression in amacrine cells is restricted to GABAergic and VGlut3 glycinergic cells, 2022, Bioscience Reports

The publication venues frequented by this researcher highlight their interdisciplinary approach, including:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Cells
  • Bioscience Reports

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts include Lei Gu, Joseph Caprioli, Jacky M. K. Kwong, and Riki Kawaguchi. Cooperation with these coauthors has contributed to advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms affecting retinal cells and visual function.

The scientist's research topics consistently address cellular and molecular mechanisms related to retinal health and pathology. Their work on oxidative damage, retinal ganglion cell survival, and gene expression in retinal cells provides insights relevant to neurodegenerative and visual disorders.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • The Hsc70 co-chaperone CHIP targets immature CFTR for proteasomal degradation

    G C Meacham;C Patterson;W Zhang;J M Younger

  • Cardiovascular complications of cancer therapy: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management.

    Edward T.H. Yeh;Ann T. Tong;Daniel J. Lenihan;S. Wamique Yusuf

  • The high-affinity HSP90-CHIP complex recognizes and selectively degrades phosphorylated tau client proteins

    Chad A. Dickey;Chad A. Dickey;Adeela Kamal;Karen Lundgren;Natalia Klosak

  • The E3 Ligase MuRF1 degrades myosin heavy chain protein in dexamethasone-treated skeletal muscle.

    Brian A. Clarke;Doreen Drujan;Monte S. Willis;Leon O. Murphy

  • CHIP is a U-box-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase: identification of Hsc70 as a target for ubiquitylation.

    Jihong Jiang;Jihong Jiang;Carol A. Ballinger;Yaxu Wu;Qian Dai

  • Targeted deletion of Dicer in the heart leads to dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure.

    Jian Fu Chen;Elizabeth P. Murchison;Ruhang Tang;Thomas E. Callis

  • CHIP: a link between the chaperone and proteasome systems

    Holly McDonough;Cam Patterson

  • Mitochondrial Integrity and Function in Atherogenesis

    Scott W. Ballinger;Cam Patterson;Cynthia A. Knight-Lozano;David L. Burow

  • Chaperone-dependent E3 ubiquitin ligase CHIP mediates a degradative pathway for c-ErbB2/Neu

    Wanping Xu;Monica Marcu;Xitong Yuan;Edward Mimnaugh

  • p47phox is required for atherosclerotic lesion progression in ApoE–/– mice

    Patricia A. Barry-Lane;Cam Patterson;Marié van der Merwe;Zhaoyong Hu

  • Sequential quality-control checkpoints triage misfolded cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator.

    J. Michael Younger;Liling Chen;Hong Yu Ren;Meredith F.N. Rosser

  • Defective valvulogenesis in HB‐EGF and TACE‐null mice is associated with aberrant BMP signaling

    Leslie F. Jackson;Ting Hu Qiu;Ting Hu Qiu;Susan W. Sunnarborg;Aileen Chang

  • Induction of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene Expression by Interleukin-1 β in Rat Aortic Smooth Muscle Cells (∗)

    Jian Li;Mark A. Perrella;Mark A. Perrella;Jer-Chia Tsai;Shaw-Fang Yet

  • Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling

    Jens Demand;Simon Alberti;Cam Patterson;Jörg Höhfeld

  • Atrogin-1/muscle atrophy F-box inhibits calcineurin-dependent cardiac hypertrophy by participating in an SCF ubiquitin ligase complex

    Hui Hua Li;Vishram Kedar;Chunlian Zhang;Holly McDonough

  • Protein quality control: U-box-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases join the fold

    Douglas M Cyr;Jörg Höhfeld;Cam Patterson

  • From the cradle to the grave: molecular chaperones that may choose between folding and degradation.

    Jörg Höhfeld;Douglas M. Cyr;Cam Patterson

  • Muscle-specific RING finger 1 is a bona fide ubiquitin ligase that degrades cardiac troponin I

    Vishram Kedar;Holly McDonough;Ranjana Arya;Hui Hua Li

  • CHIP-mediated stress recovery by sequential ubiquitination of substrates and Hsp70

    Shu Bing Qian;Holly McDonough;Frank Boellmann;Douglas M. Cyr

Frequent Co-Authors

Christoph Bode
Christoph Bode University of Freiburg
Marschall S. Runge
Marschall S. Runge University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Douglas M. Cyr
Douglas M. Cyr University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Stuart L. Cooper
Stuart L. Cooper The Ohio State University
Chad A. Dickey
Chad A. Dickey University of South Florida
David J. Glass
David J. Glass Regeneron (United States)
Da-Zhi Wang
Da-Zhi Wang Boston Children's Hospital
Leonard M. Neckers
Leonard M. Neckers National Institutes of Health
Jun Ichi Abe
Jun Ichi Abe The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cam Patterson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles