World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 50 2526 2279 196 178 102 23128

Caleb Webber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Caleb Webber between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Caleb Webber published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2020. 16 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2020. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 8 publications
1998 2025

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Caleb Webber: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 5
2005 5
2006 0
2007 3
2008 6
2009 1
2010 5
2011 4
2012 4
2013 6
2014 4
2015 9
2016 6
2017 5
2018 4
2019 11
2020 18
2021 5
2022 6
2023 6
2024 8
2025 8
Total 134
Download as CSV

Caleb Webber publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caleb Webber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 102 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131 102
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Caleb Webber D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caleb Webber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130 50
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Caleb Webber is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several intersecting scientific fields, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Neuroscience. Within these main domains, their work notably focuses on subfields such as Neurology, Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Physiology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's research interests are reflected in several major topics including Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, RNA Research and Splicing, Migraine and Headache Studies, Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments, and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments.

Some of Caleb Webber's most recent publications include:

  • Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution, 2021, Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
  • Addressing variability in iPSC-derived models of human disease: guidelines to promote reproducibility, 2020, Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • A single-cell atlas of the human substantia nigra reveals cell-specific pathways associated with neurological disorders, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Pro-maturational Effects of Human iPSC-Derived Cortical Astrocytes upon iPSC-Derived Cortical Neurons, 2020, Stem Cell Reports
  • The Parkinson's Disease Genome-Wide Association Study Locus Browser, 2020, Movement Disorders

Webber frequently collaborates with a number of colleagues, including Jimena Monzón-Sandoval, Viola Volpato, Cynthia Sandor, M. Zameel Cader, and Frank Wessely. These collaborators have worked with Webber in multiple publications.

The primary venues where Webber's work appears include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Disease Models & Mechanisms
  • Stem Cell Reports
  • Movement Disorders

Best Publications

  • Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog

    Kerstin Lindblad-Toh;Claire M Wade;Claire M Wade;Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Elinor K. Karlsson;Elinor K. Karlsson

  • Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution

    Ladeana W. Hillier;Webb Miller;Ewan Birney;Wesley Warren

  • Genome sequence of the Brown Norway rat yields insights into mammalian evolution

    Richard A. Gibbs;George M. Weinstock;Michael L. Metzker;Donna M. Muzny

  • Functional impact of global rare copy number variation in autism spectrum disorders

    Dalila Pinto;Alistair T. Pagnamenta;Lambertus Klei;Richard Anney

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • A Physical Map of 30,000 Human Genes

    P. Deloukas;G. D. Schuler;G. Gyapay;E. M. Beasley

  • Genome of the marsupial Monodelphis domestica reveals innovation in non-coding sequences

    Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Tarjei S. Mikkelsen;Matthew J. Wakefield;Bronwen Aken;Chris T. Amemiya

  • Genome analysis of the platypus reveals unique signatures of evolution

    Wesley C. Warren;La Deana W. Hillier;Jennifer A. Marshall Graves;Ewan Birney

  • Meta-analysis of 375,000 individuals identifies 38 susceptibility loci for migraine

    Padhraig Gormley;Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Bendik S. Winsvold;Bendik S. Winsvold;Priit Palta

  • A genetic variation map for chicken with 2.8 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms

    Gane Ka Shu Wong;Gane Ka Shu Wong;Gane Ka Shu Wong;Bin Liu;Jun Wang;Jun Wang;Yong Zhang;Yong Zhang

  • Systematic Phenomics Analysis Deconvolutes Genes Mutated in Intellectual Disability into Biologically Coherent Modules

    Korinna Kochinke;Christiane Zweier;Bonnie Nijhof;Michaela Fenckova

  • Bias of selection on human copy-number variants.

    Duc-Quang Nguyen;Caleb Webber;Chris P Ponting

  • Natural genetic variation caused by small insertions and deletions in the human genome

    Ryan E. Mills;W. Stephen Pittard;Julienne M. Mullaney;Umar Farooq

  • Addressing variability in iPSC-derived models of human disease: guidelines to promote reproducibility.

    Viola Volpato;Caleb Webber

  • A radiation hybrid map of the rat genome containing 5,255 markers.

    Takeshi K. Watanabe;Marie Therese Bihoreau;Linda C. McCarthy;Susanna L. Kiguwa

  • A single-cell atlas of the human substantia nigra reveals cell-specific pathways associated with neurological disorders

    Devika Agarwal;Devika Agarwal;Cynthia Sandor;Viola Volpato;Tara M. Caffrey;Tara M. Caffrey

  • GAT: a simulation framework for testing the association of genomic intervals

    Andreas Heger;Caleb Webber;Martin Goodson;Chris P. Ponting

  • CSF1R inhibitor JNJ-40346527 attenuates microglial proliferation and neurodegeneration in P301S mice

    Renzo Mancuso;Gemma Fryatt;Madeleine Cleal;Juliane Obst

  • Diagnostically relevant facial gestalt information from ordinary photos

    Quentin Ferry;Julia Steinberg;Caleb Webber;David R FitzPatrick

  • Tumour invasion and metastasis initiated by microRNA-10b in breast cancer (Nature (2007) 449, (682-688))

    Li Ma;Julie Teruya-Feldstein;Robert A. Weinberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris P. Ponting
Chris P. Ponting University of Edinburgh
Thomas Werge
Thomas Werge University of Copenhagen
Mark J. Daly
Mark J. Daly Massachusetts General Hospital
Hailiang Huang
Hailiang Huang Harvard Medical School
Rory Bowden
Rory Bowden Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research
Julie E. Buring
Julie E. Buring Brigham and Women's Hospital
Daniel I. Chasman
Daniel I. Chasman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Tobias Kurth
Tobias Kurth Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Benjamin M. Neale
Benjamin M. Neale Harvard University
Grant W. Montgomery
Grant W. Montgomery University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology in the USA can open doors to many interdisciplinary fields, both in research and applied health sciences. Online degrees are increasingly popular for students seeking flexibility and affordability. Graduates interested in mental health and development might explore child psychology masters programs online, which focus on the cognitive and emotional growth of young people.

For those looking to broaden their skillset into therapy or support services, affordable masters in counseling programs and online masters in clinical psychology offer specialized curricula that complement a bioscience background. These degrees prepare graduates for licensure and roles in clinical settings, schools, or private practice.

If you’re interested in supporting communities more broadly, consider human services online degree options. These programs prepare you for diverse roles in healthcare, non-profit organizations, advocacy, and administration. Combining molecular biology with one of these pathways can enhance your career versatility and impact.

Best Scientists Citing Caleb Webber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles