World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bas Eickhout

Bas Eickhout

Last Updated:

D-Index & Metrics

?
Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 37 8761 205 74 10083

Bas Eickhout publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bas Eickhout between 2001 and 2012, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bas Eickhout published across 12 years, from 2001 to 2012, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2008. 5 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2012. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2008. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication
2001 2012

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bas Eickhout: publications per year, 2001 to 2012
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 2
2003 4
2004 7
2005 7
2006 13
2007 14
2008 15
2009 7
2010 4
2011 4
2012 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Bas Eickhout publications per year - data summary

  • Bas Eickhout, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, has 79 publications recorded across 12 years, from 2001 to 2012.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2001 and the most recent to 2012.
  • The most productive year is 2008, with 15 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2001 and 2012, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 6.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 6.6 per year counting only the 12 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2008-2012) hold 31 publications, 39% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2001-2004: 14 publications (3.5 per year); 2005-2008: 49 publications (12.3 per year); 2009-2012: 16 publications (4.0 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Bas Eickhout publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bas Eickhout sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 74 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257 74
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Bas Eickhout publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Bas Eickhout, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, records 74 publications - the 3rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 3% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Bas Eickhout, and about 97% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Bas Eickhout ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Bas Eickhout D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bas Eickhout sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267 37
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Bas Eickhout D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Bas Eickhout, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, records 37 D-Index - the 10th percentile of the discipline.
  • 10% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Bas Eickhout, and about 90% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Bas Eickhout ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Bas Eickhout is affiliated with the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency in the Netherlands. Their academic profile reflects involvement within environmental assessment and related areas of study.

While specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues are not listed, Bas Eickhout's primary institutional connection emphasizes work aligned with national environmental assessment efforts. This affiliation positions them within a framework of environmental policy analysis and sustainability evaluation.

There are no recorded book publications or detailed data on fields and subfields of study. Likewise, information on main topics of work, awards, or citations is not present. Consequently, the profile concentrates on the affiliation and factual background available.

Best Publications

  • Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales:a multimodel evaluation

    F. Dentener;J. Drevet;Jean-François Lamarque;Isabelle Bey

  • Climate benefits of changing diet

    Elke Stehfest;Lex Bouwman;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Michel G. J. den Elzen

  • Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs

    Detlef P. van Vuuren;Michel G. J. den Elzen;Paul L. Lucas;Bas Eickhout

  • Potential of biomass energy out to 2100, for four IPCC SRES land-use scenarios

    M. Hoogwijk;M. Hoogwijk;A.P.C. Faaij;B. Eickhout;B. de Vries

  • The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe

    H. van Meijl;T. van Rheenen;A.A. Tabeau;B. Eickhout

  • A multi-scale, multi-model approach for analyzing the future dynamics of European land use

    Peter H. Verburg;Bas Eickhout;Hans van Meijl

  • Exploring changes in world ruminant production systems

    A.F. Bouwman;K.W. Van der Hoek;B. Eickhout;I. Soenario

  • The global atmospheric environment for the next generation

    F. Dentener;David Stevenson;K. Ellingsen;T. van Noije

  • Another reason for concern: regional and global impacts on ecosystems for different levels of climate change

    Rik Leemans;Bas Eickhout

  • The role of nitrogen in world food production and environmental sustainability

    B. Eickhout;A.F. Bouwman;H. van Zeijts

  • Looking into the future for agriculture and AKST

    Mark W. Rosegrant;M. Fernández;A. Sinha;J. Alder

  • Impacts of future land cover changes on atmospheric CO2 and climate

    Stephen Sitch;Victor Brovkin;Werner von Bloh;Detlef van Vuuren

  • Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing – Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework

    D.P. van Vuuren;B. Eickhout;P.L. Lucas;M.G.J. den Elzen

  • Economic and ecological consequences of four European land use scenarios

    B. Eickhout;J.C.M. van Meijl;A.A. Tabeau;T. van Rheenen

  • The land-use projections and resulting emissions in the IPCC SRES scenarios as simulated by the IMAGE 2.2 model

    B. Strengers;R. Leemans;B. Eickhout;B. de Vries

  • Impact of future land use and land cover changes on atmospheric chemistry-climate interactions

    Laurens Ganzeveld;Laurens Ganzeveld;Lex Bouwman;Elke Stehfest;Detlef P. van Vuuren

  • Comparison of Positive Matrix Factorization and Multilinear Engine for the source apportionment of particulate pollutants

    Ziad Ramadan;Bass Eickhout;Xin-Hua Song;L.M.C. Buydens

  • Scenarios of biodiversity loss in southern Africa in the 21st century

    Reinette Biggs;Henk Simons;Henk Simons;Michel Bakkenes;Robert J. Scholes

  • Land-based mitigation in climate stabilization

    S.K. Rose;H. Ahammad;B. Eickhout;B Fisher

  • Scenario Development and Analysis for Forward-looking Ecosystem Assessments

    Thomas Henrichs;Monika Zurek;Bas Eickhout;Kasper Kok

  • Local and global consequences of the EU renewable directive for biofuels: testing the sustainability criteria

    B. Eickhout;G. J. van den Born;J. Notenboom;M. van Oorschot

Frequent Co-Authors

Rik Leemans
Rik Leemans Wageningen University & Research
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University
Elke Stehfest
Elke Stehfest Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Michiel Schaeffer
Michiel Schaeffer Wageningen University & Research
Pavel Kabat
Pavel Kabat Wageningen University & Research
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Hans van Meijl
Hans van Meijl Wageningen University & Research
Alexander F. Bouwman
Alexander F. Bouwman Utrecht University
Laurens Ganzeveld
Laurens Ganzeveld Wageningen University & Research
Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, various online degrees offer flexible and affordable options. Many professionals pursue advanced credentials to enhance their impact, such as educational leadership through the best eds to edd programs. These programs prepare graduates for leadership roles in education and environmental outreach.

Social work also intersects with environmental justice, and those passionate about social impact may consider online paths like the online dsw programs in social work. These provide advanced training to tackle community and environmental challenges simultaneously.

For students seeking broader knowledge or a flexible start, a low cost online general studies degree offers a versatile foundation that can be tailored to environmental topics. Additionally, many look into the easiest bachelors degree programs to balance education with other commitments while building skills relevant to environmental careers.

Exploring these diverse online degree options opens multiple career pathways, from policy and advocacy to education and research in environmental fields.

Best Scientists Citing Bas Eickhout

Recently Published Articles