World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5248
World Ranking
11298
National Ranking
4661

Bambang Parmanto publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bambang Parmanto sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 111 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bambang Parmanto D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bambang Parmanto sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bambang Parmanto is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States and has a research focus primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Surgery, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research topics prominently feature Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Technology Use by Older Adults, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, Nutritional Studies and Diet, as well as Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation.

Among the notable recent publications associated with or involving Parmanto are:

  • A Reliable and Accessible Caregiving Language Model (CaLM) to Support Tools for Caregivers: Development and Evaluation Study, 2024, JMIR Formative Research
  • Effect of tailored, daily feedback with lifestyle self-monitoring on weight loss: The SMARTER randomized clinical trial, 2021, Obesity
  • The SMARTER Trial: Design of a trial testing tailored mHealth feedback to impact self-monitoring of diet, physical activity, and weight, 2020, Contemporary Clinical Trials
  • The Effect of Tailored, Daily, Smartphone Feedback to Lifestyle Self-Monitoring on Weight Loss at 12 Months: the SMARTER Randomized Clinical Trial, 2022, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Development and Validation of a Comprehensive Well-Being Scale for People in the University Environment (Pitt Wellness Scale) Using a Crowdsourcing Approach: Cross-Sectional Study, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research

Parmanto collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Lora E. Burke, Susan M. Sereika, Molly B. Conroy, Jessica Cheng, and Jacob K. Kariuki.

Their work is often published in recurring venues such as Circulation, Obesity, Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, and International Journal of Telerehabilitation.

Best Publications

  • The mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ): Development and Validation Study

    Leming Zhou;Jie Bao;I Made Agus Setiawan;I Made Agus Setiawan;Andi Saptono

  • Development of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire (TUQ)

    Bambang Parmanto;Allen Nelson Lewis;Kristin M. Graham;Marnie H. Bertolet

  • Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Mobile Health Apps From a Security Perspective: Mixed-Methods Study.

    Leming Zhou;Jie Bao;Valerie Watzlaf;Bambang Parmanto

  • Accessibility of Internet websites through time

    Stephanie Hackett;Bambang Parmanto;Xiaoming Zeng

  • Improving Committee Diagnosis with Resampling Techniques

    Bambang Parmanto;Paul W. Munro;Howard R. Doyle

  • Systematic Review of Mobile Health Applications in Rehabilitation

    Ryan Nussbaum;Christopher Kelly;Eleanor Quinby;Ami Mac;Ami Mac

  • A longitudinal evaluation of accessibility: higher education web sites

    Stephanie Hackett;Bambang Parmanto

  • iMHere: A Novel mHealth System for Supporting Self-Care in Management of Complex and Chronic Conditions.

    Bambang Parmanto;Gede Pramana;Daihua Xie Yu;Andrea D Fairman

  • Metric for web accessibility evaluation

    Bambang Parmanto;Xiaoming Zeng

  • A Persuasive and Social mHealth Application for Physical Activity: A Usability and Feasibility Study

    Soleh U Al Ayubi;Bambang Parmanto;Robert Branch;Dan Ding

  • Integrating Transformer and Paraphrase Rules for Sentence Simplification.

    Sanqiang Zhao;Rui Meng;Daqing He;Andi Saptono

  • Web Content Accessibility of Consumer Health Information Web Sites for People with Disabilities: A Cross Sectional Evaluation

    Xiaoming Zeng;Bambang Parmanto

  • A retrospective look at website accessibility over time

    Stephanie Hackett;Bambang Parmanto;Xiaoming Zeng

  • Reducing Variance of Committee Prediction with Resampling Techniques

    Bambang Parmanto;Paul W. Munro;Howard R. Doyle

  • Homepage not enough when evaluating web site accessibility

    Stephanie Hackett;Bambang Parmanto

  • Design Considerations for a Personalized Wheelchair Navigation System

    Dan Ding;B. Parmanto;H.A. Karimi;D. Roongpiboonsopit

  • SOVAT: Spatial OLAP Visualization and Analysis Tool

    M. Scotch;B. Parmanto

  • Using a Smartphone App and Clinician Portal to Enhance Brief Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Childhood Anxiety Disorders.

    Jennifer S. Silk;Gede Pramana;Stefanie L. Sequeira;Oliver Lindhiem

  • A User-Centered Approach: Understanding Client and Caregiver Needs and Preferences in the Development of mHealth Apps for Self-Management

    Roxanna M Bendixen;Andrea D Fairman;Meredith Karavolis;Carly Sullivan

  • Telerehabilitation: State-of-the-Art from an Informatics Perspective

    Bambang Parmanto;Andi Saptono

  • Exploring the role of GIS during community health assessment problem solving: experiences of public health professionals

    Matthew Scotch;Bambang Parmanto;Cynthia S Gadd;Cynthia S Gadd;Ravi K Sharma

  • Applying a User-Centered Approach to Building a Mobile Personal Health Record App: Development and Usability Study.

    Leming Zhou;Dilhari DeAlmeida;Bambang Parmanto

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer S. Silk
Jennifer S. Silk University of Pittsburgh
Susan M. Sereika
Susan M. Sereika University of Pittsburgh
Anne Germain
Anne Germain University of Pittsburgh
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Paul J. Lioy
Paul J. Lioy Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jane E. Clougherty
Jane E. Clougherty Drexel University
Fernando Holguin
Fernando Holguin University of Colorado Denver
Cliff I. Davidson
Cliff I. Davidson Syracuse University
Benjamin L. Handen
Benjamin L. Handen University of Pittsburgh
Amy K. Wagner
Amy K. Wagner University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing to study Computer Science opens many doors to related fields and flexible learning options. For students seeking a broader scientific background, consider the online physics degrees that blend mathematics, programming, and scientific thinking—skills closely tied to computing.

Data remains at the heart of the tech industry. If you’re interested in analytics or artificial intelligence, many data science programs in the USA offer remote study, emphasizing practical experience alongside technical knowledge.

Those drawn to hardware, robotics, or communications technology can explore the top online electrical engineering schools. Online programs in this discipline allow students to master essential engineering concepts while balancing other commitments.

Additionally, if you’re looking to quickly boost your employability, many certifications for jobs can be earned online. These credentials provide a direct pathway into tech roles, making them popular with career changers or those looking to upskill.

Best Scientists Citing Bambang Parmanto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles