World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
9953
World Ranking
3909
National Ranking
1774

Amy K. Wagner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy K. Wagner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 210 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Amy K. Wagner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy K. Wagner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Amy K. Wagner is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. Their primary research is situated within the field of Medicine, contributing extensively to multiple subfields including Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

Their work frequently appears in several publication venues, notably:

  • Neurocritical Care
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Amy K. Wagner's research covers a range of topics, with a strong focus on:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies

Selected recent papers by Amy K. Wagner include:

  • "The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting" (2020), Neurocritical Care
  • "Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions" (2021), Neurocritical Care
  • "A Precision Medicine Framework for Classifying Patients with Disorders of Consciousness: Advanced Classification of Consciousness Endotypes (ACCESS)" (2021), Neurocritical Care
  • "Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign NIH Symposium: Challenging the Future of Research for Coma and Disorders of Consciousness" (2021), Neurocritical Care
  • "Proceedings from the Consensus Conference on Trauma Patient-Reported Outcome Measures" (2020), Journal of the American College of Surgeons

The scientist collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Raj G. Kumar
  • Shannon B. Juengst
  • Richard Rubenstein
  • Kevin Wang
  • John B. Williamson

Amy K. Wagner was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Concussion in sports: postconcussive activity levels, symptoms, and neurocognitive performance.

    Cynthia W. Majerske;Jason P. Mihalik;Dianxu Ren;Michael W. Collins

  • Persistent cognitive dysfunction after traumatic brain injury: A dopamine hypothesis

    James W. Bales;Amy K. Wagner;Anthony E. Kline;C. Edward Dixon

  • Biomarkers of primary and evolving damage in traumatic and ischemic brain injury: diagnosis, prognosis, probing mechanisms, and therapeutic decision making.

    Patrick M Kochanek;Rachel P Berger;Hülya Bayir;Amy K Wagner

  • S100b as a prognostic biomarker in outcome prediction for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

    Akash Goyal;Michelle D. Failla;Christian Niyonkuru;Krutika Amin

  • Chronic Inflammation After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Characterization and Associations With Outcome at 6 and 12 Months Postinjury.

    Raj G. Kumar;Jennifer A. Boles;Amy K. Wagner

  • IL‐1β associations with posttraumatic epilepsy development: A genetics and biomarker cohort study

    Matthew L. Diamond;Anne C. Ritter;Michelle D. Failla;Jennifer A. Boles

  • Acute Serum Hormone Levels: Characterization and Prognosis after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

    Amy K. Wagner;Emily H. McCullough;Christian Niyonkuru;Haishin Ozawa

  • Acute CSF interleukin-6 trajectories after TBI: associations with neuroinflammation, polytrauma, and outcome.

    R.G. Kumar;M.L. Diamond;J.A. Boles;R.P. Berger

  • Evaluation of estrous cycle stage and gender on behavioral outcome after experimental traumatic brain injury

    Amy K. Wagner;Lauren A. Willard;Anthony E. Kline;Michael K. Wenger

  • Controlled cortical impact injury affects dopaminergic transmission in the rat striatum.

    A. K. Wagner;J. E. Sokoloski;D. Ren;X. Chen

  • Relationships between cerebrospinal fluid markers of excitotoxicity, ischemia, and oxidative damage after severe TBI: the impact of gender, age, and hypothermia

    Amy K. Wagner;Hülya Bayir;Dianxu Ren;Ava Puccio

  • Return to Productive Activity After Traumatic Brain Injury: Relationship With Measures of Disability, Handicap, and Community Integration

    Amy K. Wagner;Flora M. Hammond;Howell C. Sasser;David Wiercisiewski

  • Emerging therapies in traumatic brain injury.

    Patrick M. Kochanek;Travis C. Jackson;Nikki Miller Ferguson;Shaun W. Carlson

  • Incidence and risk factors of posttraumatic seizures following traumatic brain injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study.

    Anne C. Ritter;Amy K. Wagner;Anthony Fabio;Mary Jo Pugh

  • Trajectory analysis of serum biomarker concentrations facilitates outcome prediction after pediatric traumatic and hypoxemic brain injury.

    Rachel Pardes Berger;Michael C. Bazaco;Amy K. Wagner;Patrick M. Kochanek

  • Intentional traumatic brain injury: epidemiology, risk factors, and associations with injury severity and mortality.

    Amy Kathleen Wagner;Howell Crawford Sasser;Flora Mc Connell Hammond;David Wiercisiewski

  • Group-based trajectory analysis applications for prognostic biomarker model development in severe TBI: a practical example.

    Christian Niyonkuru;Amy K. Wagner;Haishin Ozawa;Krutika Amin

  • Intervention with environmental enrichment after experimental brain trauma enhances cognitive recovery in male but not female rats.

    Amy K Wagner;Anthony E Kline;Joshua Sokoloski;Ross D Zafonte

  • The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting.

    J Javier Provencio;J Claude Hemphill;Jan Claassen;Brian L Edlow

  • Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions.

    Brian L Edlow;Leandro R D Sanz;Len Polizzotto;Nader Pouratian

  • Gender and environmental effects on regional brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression after experimental traumatic brain injury.

    X. Chen;Y. Li;A.E. Kline;C.E. Dixon

  • Acute treatment with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT and chronic environmental enrichment confer neurobehavioral benefit after experimental brain trauma

    Anthony E. Kline;Amy K. Wagner;Brian P. Westergom;Rebecca R. Malena

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Edward Dixon
C. Edward Dixon University of Pittsburgh
Anthony E. Kline
Anthony E. Kline University of Pittsburgh
Jerzy P. Szaflarski
Jerzy P. Szaflarski University of Alabama at Birmingham
Joseph T. Giacino
Joseph T. Giacino Massachusetts General Hospital
Robert E. Ferrell
Robert E. Ferrell University of Pittsburgh
Nicholas D. Schiff
Nicholas D. Schiff Cornell University
Martin M. Monti
Martin M. Monti University of California, Los Angeles
John Whyte
John Whyte Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience
Brian L. Edlow
Brian L. Edlow Harvard University
Jed A. Hartings
Jed A. Hartings University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to many rewarding careers. If you're thinking about the highest paying majors in this field, neuroscience stands out for its potential—offering roles in medicine, technology, and research.

Many students consider flexibility and affordability when choosing their path. There are numerous colleges online that accept fafsa, making it possible to finance your education with federal aid and explore online neuroscience programs from home.

To enhance your credentials, you might look into certificates i can get online. These can boost your resume in specialized areas like neuroimaging, data science, or clinical research, helping you stand out in the job market.

If you're seeking a flexible learning path, browse online degree programs that align with your goals. Online learning can be a great way to balance studies, work, and personal commitments while preparing for a rewarding neuroscience career.

Best Scientists Citing Amy K. Wagner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles