World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jacob Andreas

Jacob Andreas

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7925
World Ranking
8771
National Ranking
3750

Jacob Andreas publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Andreas sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 105 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jacob Andreas D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacob Andreas sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacob Andreas is a researcher affiliated with MIT in the United States, primarily working in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Systems, Ecology, and Developmental Biology.

Their work covers a wide range of topics with notable focus areas such as:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Marine animal studies overview

Jacob Andreas has contributed extensively to scientific literature, especially through publications in well-known venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • iScience
  • Nature Communications

The following is a selection of recent papers authored or coauthored by Jacob Andreas:

  • "What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models" (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Pre-Trained Language Models for Interactive Decision-Making" (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Compositional Explanations of Neurons" (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Toward understanding the communication in sperm whales" (2022), iScience
  • "A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understanding" (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Antonio Torralba
  • Pratyusha Sharma
  • Ekin Akyürek
  • Belinda Z. Li
  • Joshua B. Tenenbaum

Jacob Andreas' publication record reflects a focus on theoretical and applied aspects of artificial intelligence, with an emphasis on language understanding, interactive decision-making models, and explanations of neural representations. Some of their investigations extend into multidisciplinary areas such as marine animal communication, indicating engagement with ecological and biological data analysis methodologies.

The combination of topics and publication venues illustrates a career actively contributing to both the advancement of fundamental AI research and its applications across diverse domains.

Best Publications

  • Neural Module Networks

    Jacob Andreas;Marcus Rohrbach;Trevor Darrell;Dan Klein

  • Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answering

    Ronghang Hu;Jacob Andreas;Marcus Rohrbach;Trevor Darrell

  • Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answering

    Jacob Andreas;Marcus Rohrbach;Trevor Darrell;Dan Klein

  • Modeling Relationships in Referential Expressions with Compositional Modular Networks

    Ronghang Hu;Marcus Rohrbach;Jacob Andreas;Trevor Darrell

  • Speaker-Follower Models for Vision-and-Language Navigation

    Daniel Fried;Ronghang Hu;Volkan Cirik;Anna Rohrbach

  • Modular multitask reinforcement learning with policy sketches

    Jacob Andreas;Dan Klein;Sergey Levine

  • Experience Grounds Language

    Yonatan Bisk;Ari Holtzman;Jesse Thomason;Jacob Andreas

  • What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear models

    Unknown

  • Deep Compositional Question Answering with Neural Module Networks

    Jacob Andreas;Marcus Rohrbach;Trevor Darrell;Dan Klein

  • Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentation

    Jacob Andreas

  • A Minimal Span-Based Neural Constituency Parser

    Mitchell Stern;Jacob Andreas;Dan Klein

  • Explainable Neural Computation via Stack Neural Module Networks

    Ronghang Hu;Jacob Andreas;Trevor Darrell;Kate Saenko

  • A Survey of Reinforcement Learning Informed by Natural Language

    Jelena Luketina;Nantas Nardelli;Nantas Nardelli;Gregory Farquhar;Gregory Farquhar;Jakob N. Foerster

  • Reasoning About Pragmatics with Neural Listeners and Speakers

    Jacob Andreas;Dan Klein

  • Semantics-Based Machine Translation with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars

    Bevan Jones;Jacob Andreas;Daniel Bauer;Karl Moritz Hermann

  • Learning with Latent Language

    Jacob Andreas;Dan Klein;Sergey Levine

  • Parsing Graphs with Hyperedge Replacement Grammars

    David Chiang;Jacob Andreas;Daniel Bauer;Karl Moritz Hermann

  • Semantic Parsing as Machine Translation

    Jacob Andreas;Andreas Vlachos;Stephen Clark

  • Unified Pragmatic Models for Generating and Following Instructions

    Daniel Fried;Jacob Andreas;Dan Klein

  • Task-Oriented Dialogue as Dataflow Synthesis

    Jacob Andreas;John Bufe;David Burkett;Charles Chen

  • Compositional Explanations of Neurons

    Jesse Mu;Jacob Andreas

  • Implicit Representations of Meaning in Neural Language Models

    Belinda Z. Li;Maxwell Nye;Jacob Andreas

  • Task-Oriented Dialogue as Dataflow Synthesis

    Semantic Machines;Jacob Andreas;John Bufe;David Burkett

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Klein
Daniel Klein University of California, Berkeley
Trevor Darrell
Trevor Darrell University of California, Berkeley
Kate Saenko
Kate Saenko Boston University
Marcus Rohrbach
Marcus Rohrbach Facebook (United States)
Sergey Levine
Sergey Levine University of California, Berkeley
Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick
Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick University of California, San Diego
Kathleen R. McKeown
Kathleen R. McKeown Columbia University
Yu Su
Yu Su The Ohio State University
Tim Rocktäschel
Tim Rocktäschel University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Computer Science in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open up a variety of career opportunities. Fields like engineering, data analysis, and physics all offer in-demand roles for tech-savvy graduates.

For those fascinated by the physical sciences, pursuing a bachelor of science in physics online can provide a strong foundation in problem-solving and critical thinking, applicable in both research and industry settings.

The tech world’s growing demand for data-driven solutions also makes a data science degree highly attractive. With the flexibility of online study, you can prepare for well-paying tech careers while balancing other commitments.

Engineering is another popular pathway, and there are several accredited online electrical engineering programs available. These programs teach you to design and maintain high-tech systems, offering excellent job prospects in today’s digital economy.

For quicker entry into the workforce, consider certificate programs that pay well. Certifications in areas like programming, IT, or cybersecurity can boost your résumé and fast-track your tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Jacob Andreas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles