World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
22666
World Ranking
15238
National Ranking
7686

Robert M. Wachter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Wachter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 319 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert M. Wachter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Wachter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Robert M. Wachter is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans key areas in medicine and health professions, with a focus on infectious diseases, health informatics, and public health, environmental and occupational health. Wachter's work addresses several critical topics such as SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, electronic health records systems, COVID-19 clinical research studies, healthcare cost and quality practices, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, and healthcare policy and management.

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Focusing on Digital Health Equity," 2021, JAMA
  • "Oral Nirmatrelvir and Ritonavir in Nonhospitalized Vaccinated Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019," 2022, Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Will Generative Artificial Intelligence Deliver on Its Promise in Health Care?" 2023, JAMA
  • "Delayed Second Dose versus Standard Regimen for Covid-19 Vaccination," 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Preparing Clinicians for a Clinical World Influenced by Artificial Intelligence," 2022, JAMA

Their frequent co-authors include Sarju Ganatra, Sourbha S. Dani, Javaria Ahmad, Jui Shah, and George M. Abraham. Wachter publishes regularly in venues such as JAMA, JAMA Internal Medicine, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Clinical Infectious Diseases, and the New England Journal of Medicine.

Wachter's publication record shows a concentration in the fields of medicine and health professions. Their subfields include infectious diseases, general health professions, health informatics, public health, as well as health information management.

Wachter was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

    K G Shojania;B W Duncan;K M McDonald;R M Wachter

  • The Emerging Role of “Hospitalists” in the American Health Care System

    Robert M. Wachter;Lee Goldman

  • Accountability Measures — Using Measurement to Promote Quality Improvement

    Mark R. Chassin;Jerod M. Loeb;Stephen P. Schmaltz;Robert M. Wachter

  • Patient Safety At Ten: Unmistakable Progress, Troubling Gaps

    Robert M. Wachter

  • The hospitalist movement 5 years later.

    Robert M. Wachter;Lee Goldman

  • The Top Patient Safety Strategies That Can Be Encouraged for Adoption Now

    Paul G. Shekelle;Peter J. Pronovost;Robert M. Wachter;Kathryn M. McDonald

  • Balancing “No Blame” with Accountability in Patient Safety

    Robert M. Wachter;Peter J. Pronovost

  • The end of the beginning: patient safety five years after 'to err is human'.

    Robert M. Wachter

  • Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices.

    P G Shekelle;R M Wachter;P J Pronovost;K Schoelles

  • “July Effect”: Impact of the Academic Year-End Changeover on Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review

    John Q. Young;Sumant R. Ranji;Robert M. Wachter;Connie M. Lee

  • Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: strategies for a safe and effective resident sign-out.

    Arpana R. Vidyarthi;Vineet Arora;Jeffrey L. Schnipper;Susan D. Wall

  • The Digital Doctor: Hope, Hype, and Harm at the Dawn of Medicine's Computer Age

    Robert M. Wachter

  • Hospital-initiated transitional care interventions as a patient safety strategy: a systematic review

    Stephanie Rennke;Oanh K. Nguyen;Marwa H. Shoeb;Yimdriuska Magan

  • Reorganizing an Academic Medical Service: Impact on Cost, Quality, Patient Satisfaction, and Education

    Robert M. Wachter;Patricia Katz;Jonathan Showstack;Andrew B. Bindman

  • Medical and Surgical Comanagement after Elective Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Jeanne M. Huddleston;Kirsten Hall Long;James M. Naessens;David Vanness

  • Safe but Sound: Patient Safety Meets Evidence-Based Medicine

    Kaveh G. Shojania;Bradford W. Duncan;Kathryn M. McDonald;Robert M. Wachter

  • Decisions about resuscitation: inequities among patients with different diseases but similar prognoses.

    Robert M. Wachter;John M. Luce;Norman Hearst;Bernard Lo

  • Advancing the Science of Patient Safety

    Paul G. Shekelle;Peter J. Pronovost;Robert M. Wachter;Stephanie L. Taylor

  • Tracking progress in patient safety: an elusive target.

    Peter J. Pronovost;Marlene R. Miller;Robert M. Wachter

  • Intensive Care of Patients with the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Outcome and Changing Patterns of Utilization

    R. M. Wachter;J. M. Luce;J. Turner;P. Volberding

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter J. Pronovost
Peter J. Pronovost Case Western Reserve University
Paul G. Shekelle
Paul G. Shekelle RAND Corporation
Patricia P. Katz
Patricia P. Katz University of California, San Francisco
Lee Goldman
Lee Goldman Columbia University
John Øvretveit
John Øvretveit Karolinska Institute
Philip C. Hopewell
Philip C. Hopewell University of California, San Francisco
Sanjay Saint
Sanjay Saint University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Azeem Majeed
Azeem Majeed Imperial College London
Margaret L. Brandeau
Margaret L. Brandeau Stanford University
Gregg S. Meyer
Gregg S. Meyer Massachusetts General Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine, pursuing alternative or supplementary online healthcare degrees can offer flexible routes into clinical practice or advanced nursing roles. Many learners are attracted by programs that compress the timeline of traditional degrees while building specialized skills.

If you’re already a registered nurse, you might want to explore short DNP programs that accelerate your path to the highest level of nursing practice. These options are ideal for those seeking to fast-track leadership or clinical expertise. For those preferring a less intensive approach, look into easy DNP programs designed to be more flexible and manageable alongside professional commitments.

Aspiring nurses can consider what is the fastest way to become an LPN, which covers online pathways that help you quickly begin your career in nursing. Additionally, if you’re interested in mental health, look for accelerated MSN psychiatric NP programs to specialize in this growing area.

These varied educational routes allow you to tailor your studies to meet your career ambitions and timeline.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Wachter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles