World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonella Caccamo

Antonella Caccamo

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
15613
World Ranking
8196
National Ranking
448

Antonella Caccamo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella Caccamo sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Antonella Caccamo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella Caccamo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Antonella Caccamo is affiliated with the University of Messina in Italy and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Molecular Biology, Neurology, Physiology, Epidemiology, and Biological Psychiatry.

Their work primarily focuses on the following topics:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Antonella Caccamo's frequent co-authors include:

  • Salvatore Oddo
  • Laura Maria De Plano
  • Sabrina Conoci
  • Andrea Magrì
  • Francesca Guarino

They have published research in several recurrent scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Cells
  • Biomolecules
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Biology
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Some of the recent papers associated with their work are:

  • The Role of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 in Alzheimer's Disease: Therapeutic Opportunities (2023), Biomolecules
  • Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (2022), International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Epigenetic Changes in Alzheimer's Disease: DNA Methylation and Histone Modification (2024), Cells
  • ERK1/2-dependent TSPO overactivation associates with the loss of mitophagy and mitochondrial respiration in ALS (2023), Cell Death and Disease
  • Small Hexokinase 1 Peptide against Toxic SOD1 G93A Mitochondrial Accumulation in ALS Rescues the ATP-Related Respiration (2021), Biomedicines

Best Publications

  • Triple-Transgenic Model of Alzheimer's Disease with Plaques and Tangles: Intracellular Aβ and Synaptic Dysfunction

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Jason D. Shepherd;M. Paul Murphy

  • Amyloid deposition precedes tangle formation in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Masashi Kitazawa;Bertrand P. Tseng

  • Molecular Interplay between Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR), Amyloid-β, and Tau EFFECTS ON COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS

    Antonella Caccamo;Smita Majumder;Arlan Richardson;Arlan Richardson;Randy Strong;Randy Strong

  • Temporal profile of amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomerization in an in vivo model of Alzheimer disease: A link between Aβ and tau pathology

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Levina Tran;Mary P. Lambert

  • M1 Receptors Play a Central Role in Modulating AD-like Pathology in Transgenic Mice

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo;Lauren M. Billings;Kim N. Green

  • Necroptosis activation in Alzheimer's disease

    Antonella Caccamo;Caterina Branca;Ignazio S. Piras;Eric Ferreira

  • mTOR regulates tau phosphorylation and degradation: implications for Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies.

    Antonella Caccamo;Andrea Magrì;David X. Medina;Elena V. Wisely

  • Reduction of Soluble Aβ and Tau, but Not Soluble Aβ Alone, Ameliorates Cognitive Decline in Transgenic Mice with Plaques and Tangles

    Salvatore Oddo;Vitaly Vasilevko;Antonella Caccamo;Masashi Kitazawa

  • Age- and region-dependent alterations in Aβ-degrading enzymes: implications for Aβ-induced disorders

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo;Michael C. Sugarman;Yama Akbari

  • Dysregulated IP3 Signaling in Cortical Neurons of Knock-In Mice Expressing an Alzheimer's-Linked Mutation in Presenilin1 Results in Exaggerated Ca2+ Signals and Altered Membrane Excitability

    Grace E. Stutzmann;Antonella Caccamo;Frank M. LaFerla;Ian Parker

  • Enhanced ryanodine receptor recruitment contributes to Ca2+ disruptions in young, adult, and aged Alzheimer's disease mice.

    Grace E. Stutzmann;Grace E. Stutzmann;Ian Smith;Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo

  • Age-dependent sexual dimorphism in cognition and stress response in the 3xTg-AD mice.

    Lani K. Clinton;Lauren M. Billings;Kim N. Green;Antonella Caccamo

  • A Dynamic Relationship between Intracellular and Extracellular Pools of Aβ

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Ian F. Smith;Kim N. Green

  • Temporal and regional progression of Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in 3xTg-AD mice.

    Ramona Belfiore;Ramona Belfiore;Alexis Rodin;Eric Ferreira;Ramon Velazquez

  • CBP gene transfer increases BDNF levels and ameliorates learning and memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    Antonella Caccamo;Monica A. Maldonado;Alex F. Bokov;Smita Majumder

  • Chronic nicotine administration exacerbates tau pathology in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Kim N. Green;Kevin Liang

  • Methylene Blue Reduces Aβ Levels and Rescues Early Cognitive Deficit by Increasing Proteasome Activity

    David X. Medina;Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo

  • Lithium Reduces Tau Phosphorylation but Not Aβ or Working Memory Deficits in a Transgenic Model with Both Plaques and Tangles

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo;Lana X. Tran;Frank M. LaFerla

  • Lifelong rapamycin administration ameliorates age-dependent cognitive deficits by reducing IL-1β and enhancing NMDA signaling.

    Smita Majumder;Antonella Caccamo;David X. Medina;Adriana D. Benavides

  • Naturally Secreted Amyloid-β Increases Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Activity via a PRAS40-mediated Mechanism

    Antonella Caccamo;Monica A. Maldonado;Smita Majumder;David X. Medina

  • CBP gene transfer increases BDNF levels and ameliorates learning and memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore Oddo
Salvatore Oddo Arizona State University
Frank M. LaFerla
Frank M. LaFerla University of California, Irvine
Kim N. Green
Kim N. Green University of California, Irvine
David H. Cribbs
David H. Cribbs University of California, Irvine
Arlan Richardson
Arlan Richardson University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Ian Parker
Ian Parker University of California, Irvine
Abraham Fisher
Abraham Fisher Israel Institute for Biological Research
Rochelle Buffenstein
Rochelle Buffenstein The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Matthew J. Huentelman
Matthew J. Huentelman Translational Genomics Research Institute
James L. McGaugh
James L. McGaugh University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with related online programs. Many professionals choose to supplement their neuroscience background with degrees in social work, psychology, or counseling to expand their career prospects and skill sets.

Those interested in working in clinical or community settings often pursue an accelerated social work degree to fast-track careers in social services and mental health. Similarly, students can consider accelerated psychology programs to gain a deeper understanding of human behavior, useful for research or therapy roles.

For those aiming for counseling positions, the best online CACREP counseling programs offer accredited pathways to become licensed counselors. Additionally, pursuing a masters in counseling can lead to rewarding roles in schools, clinics, or private practice.

Combining neuroscience with these related online degrees can help graduates stay versatile and competitive in an evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Antonella Caccamo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles