World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antonella Caccamo

Antonella Caccamo

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 39 8196 7567 448 431 63 15613

Antonella Caccamo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonella Caccamo between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonella Caccamo published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2006. 4 of the 79 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2006. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
2003 2026

79 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonella Caccamo: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 1
2005 2
2006 9
2007 4
2008 2
2009 3
2010 5
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 4
2016 1
2017 5
2018 2
2019 1
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
2023 6
2024 9
2025 3
2026 1
Total 79
Download as CSV

Antonella Caccamo publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella Caccamo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 58–67 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193 63
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Antonella Caccamo D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonella Caccamo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Antonella Caccamo is affiliated with the University of Messina in Italy and has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their research spans multiple subfields, including Molecular Biology, Neurology, Physiology, Epidemiology, and Biological Psychiatry.

Their work primarily focuses on the following topics:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Bacteriophages and microbial interactions
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Antonella Caccamo's frequent co-authors include:

  • Salvatore Oddo
  • Laura Maria De Plano
  • Sabrina Conoci
  • Andrea Magrì
  • Francesca Guarino

They have published research in several recurrent scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Cells
  • Biomolecules
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Biology
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Some of the recent papers associated with their work are:

  • The Role of the Transcription Factor Nrf2 in Alzheimer's Disease: Therapeutic Opportunities (2023), Biomolecules
  • Applications of CRISPR-Cas9 in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders (2022), International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Epigenetic Changes in Alzheimer's Disease: DNA Methylation and Histone Modification (2024), Cells
  • ERK1/2-dependent TSPO overactivation associates with the loss of mitophagy and mitochondrial respiration in ALS (2023), Cell Death and Disease
  • Small Hexokinase 1 Peptide against Toxic SOD1 G93A Mitochondrial Accumulation in ALS Rescues the ATP-Related Respiration (2021), Biomedicines

Best Publications

  • Triple-Transgenic Model of Alzheimer's Disease with Plaques and Tangles: Intracellular Aβ and Synaptic Dysfunction

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Jason D. Shepherd;M. Paul Murphy

  • Amyloid deposition precedes tangle formation in a triple transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Masashi Kitazawa;Bertrand P. Tseng

  • Molecular Interplay between Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR), Amyloid-β, and Tau EFFECTS ON COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENTS

    Antonella Caccamo;Smita Majumder;Arlan Richardson;Arlan Richardson;Randy Strong;Randy Strong

  • Temporal profile of amyloid-β (Aβ) oligomerization in an in vivo model of Alzheimer disease: A link between Aβ and tau pathology

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Levina Tran;Mary P. Lambert

  • M1 Receptors Play a Central Role in Modulating AD-like Pathology in Transgenic Mice

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo;Lauren M. Billings;Kim N. Green

  • Necroptosis activation in Alzheimer's disease

    Antonella Caccamo;Caterina Branca;Ignazio S. Piras;Eric Ferreira

  • mTOR regulates tau phosphorylation and degradation: implications for Alzheimer's disease and other tauopathies.

    Antonella Caccamo;Andrea Magrì;David X. Medina;Elena V. Wisely

  • Reduction of Soluble Aβ and Tau, but Not Soluble Aβ Alone, Ameliorates Cognitive Decline in Transgenic Mice with Plaques and Tangles

    Salvatore Oddo;Vitaly Vasilevko;Antonella Caccamo;Masashi Kitazawa

  • Age- and region-dependent alterations in Aβ-degrading enzymes: implications for Aβ-induced disorders

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo;Michael C. Sugarman;Yama Akbari

  • Dysregulated IP3 Signaling in Cortical Neurons of Knock-In Mice Expressing an Alzheimer's-Linked Mutation in Presenilin1 Results in Exaggerated Ca2+ Signals and Altered Membrane Excitability

    Grace E. Stutzmann;Antonella Caccamo;Frank M. LaFerla;Ian Parker

  • Enhanced ryanodine receptor recruitment contributes to Ca2+ disruptions in young, adult, and aged Alzheimer's disease mice.

    Grace E. Stutzmann;Grace E. Stutzmann;Ian Smith;Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo

  • Age-dependent sexual dimorphism in cognition and stress response in the 3xTg-AD mice.

    Lani K. Clinton;Lauren M. Billings;Kim N. Green;Antonella Caccamo

  • A Dynamic Relationship between Intracellular and Extracellular Pools of Aβ

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Ian F. Smith;Kim N. Green

  • Temporal and regional progression of Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in 3xTg-AD mice.

    Ramona Belfiore;Ramona Belfiore;Alexis Rodin;Eric Ferreira;Ramon Velazquez

  • CBP gene transfer increases BDNF levels and ameliorates learning and memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    Antonella Caccamo;Monica A. Maldonado;Alex F. Bokov;Smita Majumder

  • Chronic nicotine administration exacerbates tau pathology in a transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease

    Salvatore Oddo;Antonella Caccamo;Kim N. Green;Kevin Liang

  • Methylene Blue Reduces Aβ Levels and Rescues Early Cognitive Deficit by Increasing Proteasome Activity

    David X. Medina;Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo

  • Lithium Reduces Tau Phosphorylation but Not Aβ or Working Memory Deficits in a Transgenic Model with Both Plaques and Tangles

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo;Lana X. Tran;Frank M. LaFerla

  • Lifelong rapamycin administration ameliorates age-dependent cognitive deficits by reducing IL-1β and enhancing NMDA signaling.

    Smita Majumder;Antonella Caccamo;David X. Medina;Adriana D. Benavides

  • Naturally Secreted Amyloid-β Increases Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) Activity via a PRAS40-mediated Mechanism

    Antonella Caccamo;Monica A. Maldonado;Smita Majumder;David X. Medina

  • CBP gene transfer increases BDNF levels and ameliorates learning and memory deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    Antonella Caccamo;Salvatore Oddo

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore Oddo
Salvatore Oddo Arizona State University
Frank M. LaFerla
Frank M. LaFerla University of California, Irvine
Kim N. Green
Kim N. Green University of California, Irvine
David H. Cribbs
David H. Cribbs University of California, Irvine
Arlan Richardson
Arlan Richardson University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Ian Parker
Ian Parker University of California, Irvine
Abraham Fisher
Abraham Fisher Israel Institute for Biological Research
Rochelle Buffenstein
Rochelle Buffenstein The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Matthew J. Huentelman
Matthew J. Huentelman Translational Genomics Research Institute
James L. McGaugh
James L. McGaugh University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, especially when combined with related online programs. Many professionals choose to supplement their neuroscience background with degrees in social work, psychology, or counseling to expand their career prospects and skill sets.

Those interested in working in clinical or community settings often pursue an accelerated social work degree to fast-track careers in social services and mental health. Similarly, students can consider accelerated psychology programs to gain a deeper understanding of human behavior, useful for research or therapy roles.

For those aiming for counseling positions, the best online CACREP counseling programs offer accredited pathways to become licensed counselors. Additionally, pursuing a masters in counseling can lead to rewarding roles in schools, clinics, or private practice.

Combining neuroscience with these related online degrees can help graduates stay versatile and competitive in an evolving job market.

Best Scientists Citing Antonella Caccamo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles