World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
7294
World Ranking
5825
National Ranking
1633

Patrick E. Crago publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick E. Crago sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 132 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Patrick E. Crago D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick E. Crago sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Control theory
  • Neuroscience
  • Anatomy

Patrick E. Crago focuses on Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Control theory, Anatomy, Stiffness and Biomechanics. His study focuses on the intersection of Physical medicine and rehabilitation and fields such as Elbow with connections in the field of Functional electrical stimulation. Many of his research projects under Anatomy are closely connected to Sampling with Sampling, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

Patrick E. Crago has researched Tendon in several fields, including Wrist, Ulnar deviation and Forearm. As a member of one scientific family, Patrick E. Crago mostly works in the field of Stiffness, focusing on Isometric exercise and, on occasion, Discrete time and continuous time and Nonlinear system. His Biomechanics study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Joint stiffness, Structural engineering, Neural control and Motor control.

His most cited work include:

  • Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex (554 citations)
  • Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity. (203 citations)
  • A dynamic model for simulating movements of the elbow, forearm, and wrist (197 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Control theory, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Biomechanics, Anatomy and Neuroprosthetics. Control theory is closely attributed to Stiffness in his research. The various areas that Patrick E. Crago examines in his Physical medicine and rehabilitation study include Functional electrical stimulation, Spinal cord injury, Elbow, Physical therapy and Neuromuscular stimulation.

Patrick E. Crago studied Biomechanics and Isometric exercise that intersect with Motor control and Motor system. His work on Wrist and Tendon as part of his general Anatomy study is frequently connected to Odontophore and Kinematics, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His Neuroprosthetics study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Object, Neurophysiology, Tetraplegia and Forearm.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Control theory (36.43%)
  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation (32.56%)
  • Biomechanics (30.23%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2001-2019)?

  • Physical medicine and rehabilitation (32.56%)
  • Functional electrical stimulation (16.28%)
  • Stimulation (15.50%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Functional electrical stimulation, Stimulation, Biomechanics and Physical therapy. He studies Physical medicine and rehabilitation, namely Neuroprosthetics. In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Neuroprosthetics, Control theory is strongly linked to Spinal cord injury.

His Biomechanics research incorporates themes from Cheek, Muscular hydrostat, Neural control and Isometric exercise. Patrick E. Crago works mostly in the field of Isometric exercise, limiting it down to concerns involving Control theory and, occasionally, Orientation. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Hemiparesis, Neuromuscular stimulation and Elbow.

Between 2001 and 2019, his most popular works were:

  • Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement (178 citations)
  • Voluntary Control of Static Endpoint Stiffness During Force Regulation Tasks (109 citations)
  • Voluntary Control of Static Endpoint Stiffness During Force Regulation Tasks (109 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Control theory
  • Neuroscience
  • Anatomy

Patrick E. Crago mainly investigates Stiffness, Control theory, Biomechanics, Physical medicine and rehabilitation and Isometric exercise. His Stiffness study incorporates themes from Orientation and Control. His Biomechanics study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Neural control.

His work in Physical medicine and rehabilitation addresses issues such as Elbow, which are connected to fields such as Tetraplegia. His studies deal with areas such as Motor system and Motor control as well as Isometric exercise. His research integrates issues of Tendon transfer, Tendon, Control theory, Range of motion and Electromyography in his study of Neuroprosthetics.

Best Publications

  • Regulatory actions of human stretch reflex

    Patrick E Crago;J. C. Houk;Z. Hasan

  • A dynamic model for simulating movements of the elbow, forearm, and wrist

    Michel A. Lemay;Michel A. Lemay;Patrick E. Crago;Patrick E. Crago

  • Sampling of total muscle force by tendon organs.

    Patrick E Crago;J. C. Houk;W. Z. Rymer

  • Dependence of dynamic response of spindle receptors on muscle length and velocity.

    J. C. Houk;W. Z. Rymer;Patrick E Crago

  • Modulation of Muscle Force by Recruitment During Intramuscular Stimulation

    Patrick E. Crago;P. Hunter Peckham;Geoffrey B. Thrope

  • Stiffness regulation by reflex action in the normal human hand.

    R. R. Carter;P. E. Crago;M. W. Keith

  • Biomechanics and Neural Control of Posture and Movement

    Jack M. Winters;Patrick E. Crago

  • New control strategies for neuroprosthetic systems

    Patrick E. Crago;Ning Lan;Peter H. Veltink;James J. Abbas

  • Multijoint dynamics and postural stability of the human arm

    Eric J. Perreault;Robert F. Kirsch;Robert F. Kirsch;Patrick E. Crago;Patrick E. Crago

  • Effects of voluntary force generation on the elastic components of endpoint stiffness

    Eric J. Perreault;Robert F. Kirsch;Patrick E. Crago

  • Sensors for Use with Functional Neuromuscular Stimulation

    Patrick E. Crago;Hpward J. Chizeck;Michael R. Neuman;F. Terry Hambrecht

  • Closed-Loop Control of Force During Electrical Stimulation of Muscle

    Patrick E. Crago;J. Thomas Mortimer;P. Hunter Peckham

  • Feedback regulation of hand grasp opening and contact force during stimulation of paralyzed muscle

    P.E. Crago;R.J. Nakai;H.J. Chizeck

  • The choice of pulse duration for chronic electrical stimulation via surface, nerve, and intramuscular electrodes.

    Patrick E. Crago;P. Hunter Peckham;J. Thomas Mortimer;Joseph P. Van Der Meulen

  • A Discrete-Time Model of Electrcally Stimulated Muscle

    Leonas A. Bernotas;Patrick E. Crago;Howard J. Chizeck

  • Nonlinear joint angle control for artificially stimulated muscle

    P.H. Veltink;H.J. Chizeck;P.E. Crago;A. El-Bialy

  • Mechanisms of the clasp-knife reflex studied in an animal model.

    William Z Rymer;James Charles Houk;P. E. Crago

  • Voluntary Control of Static Endpoint Stiffness During Force Regulation Tasks

    Eric J. Perreault;Robert F. Kirsch;Robert F. Kirsch;Patrick E. Crago;Patrick E. Crago

  • An elbow extension neuroprosthesis for individuals with tetraplegia

    P.E. Crago;W.D. Memberg;M.K. Usey;M.W. Keith

  • Adaptive Control of Electrically Stimulated Muscle

    Leonas A. Bernotas;Patrick E. Crago;Howard J. Chizeck

Frequent Co-Authors

Howard Jay Chizeck
Howard Jay Chizeck University of Washington
Eric J. Perreault
Eric J. Perreault Northwestern University
Hillel J. Chiel
Hillel J. Chiel Case Western Reserve University
P. Hunter Peckham
P. Hunter Peckham Case Western Reserve University
William Z. Rymer
William Z. Rymer Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
James C. Houk
James C. Houk Northwestern University
Kevin L. Kilgore
Kevin L. Kilgore Case Western Reserve University
David L. Wilson
David L. Wilson Case Western Reserve University
Randall D. Beer
Randall D. Beer Indiana University
Peter H. Veltink
Peter H. Veltink University of Twente

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to many exciting and related career options. For those interested in leadership and strategic roles, the cheapest online master’s in project management provides an affordable path to gaining vital project management skills commonly sought by employers.

If your interests lean toward property, construction, or urban planning, you might consider pursuing an online real estate bachelor's degree. This flexible degree is ideal for students looking to launch or advance careers in real estate, property management, or related fields.

The technology sector is also booming with opportunities in user-centered design. By earning a ux degree online, you can develop expertise in enhancing digital experiences, which is highly valued across tech companies and startups alike.

Curious about the practical applications of your degree? Delve into what can you do with a project management degree to discover the wide range of roles and industries where your skills can lead to rewarding and dynamic careers.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick E. Crago

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles