World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
12463
World Ranking
7475
National Ranking
432

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
22229
World Ranking
3921
National Ranking
290

Anthony R. Clarke publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Clarke sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 332 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Anthony R. Clarke D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony R. Clarke sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony R. Clarke was affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom and contributed extensively to research in Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a strong focus on Insect Science. Their work intersected multiple areas including Ecology, Molecular Biology, Plant Science, and the subfield of Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

Clarke's research addressed topics such as:

  • Insect behavior and control techniques
  • Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Insect Pest Control Strategies
  • Insect Utilization and Effects
  • Insect Resistance and Genetics
  • Plant and animal studies

Their recent published work included multiple papers, with key contributions listed below:

  • "A comprehensive phylogeny helps clarify the evolutionary history of host breadth and lure response in the Australian Dacini fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae)" (2022), published in Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • "The Fallacy of Year-Round Breeding in Polyphagous Tropical Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae): Evidence for a Seasonal Reproductive Arrestment in Bactrocera Species" (2022), published in Insects
  • "Effects of advanced age on olfactory response of male and female Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni (Froggatt) (Diptera: Tephritidae)" (2020), published in Journal of Insect Physiology
  • "A polyphagous, tropical insect herbivore shows strong seasonality in age-structure and longevity independent of temperature and host availability" (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Age-related changes in the reproductive potential of the Queensland fruit fly" (2021), published in Journal of Insect Physiology

Frequent collaborators throughout Clarke's career included Katharina Merkel, Peter J. Prentis, Bianca J. Kay, Rehan Silva, and Mst Shahrima Tasnin. These coauthors appeared repeatedly in their joint publications.

The most common publication venues where Clarke's work appeared were:

  • Austral Entomology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Insects
  • Journal of Insect Physiology
  • Scientific Reports

Clarke's body of research helped illuminate aspects of insect ecology and control techniques, particularly focusing on fruit fly species, their behavior, reproductive biology, and interactions with plant hosts and environments. The range of topics and subfields indicates a multidisciplinary approach that bridged molecular biology with broader ecological and agricultural concerns.

Best Publications

  • A General Model of Prion Strains and Their Pathogenicity

    John Collinge;Anthony R. Clarke

  • Prion protein is necessary for normal synaptic function

    John Collinge;Miles A. Whittington;Katie C. L. Sidle;Corinne J. Smith

  • Invasive phytophagous pests arising through a recent tropical evolutionary radiation: the Bactrocera dorsalis complex of fruit flies.

    Anthony R Clarke;Karen F Armstrong;Amy E Carmichael;John R Milne

  • ECOLOGY AND BEHAVIOR OF FIRST INSTAR LARVAL LEPIDOPTERA

    Myron P. Zalucki;Anthony R. Clarke;Stephen B. Malcolm

  • Location and properties of metal-binding sites on the human prion protein.

    Graham S. Jackson;Ian Murray;Laszlo L. P. Hosszu;Nicholas Gibbs

  • Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy.

    Shaoxia Chen;Alan M. Roseman;Allison S. Hunter;Stephen P. Wood

  • A Specific, Highly Active Malate Dehydrogenase by Redesign of a Lactate Dehydrogenase Framework

    Helen M. Wilks;Keith W. Hart;Raymond Feeney;Cameron R. Dunn

  • Prion propagation and toxicity in vivo occur in two distinct mechanistic phases

    Malin K. Sandberg;Huda Al-Doujaily;Bernadette Sharps;Anthony R. Clarke

  • Strain-specific prion-protein conformation determined by metal ions

    Jonathan D.F. Wadsworth;Andrew F. Hill;Susan Joiner;Graham S. Jackson

  • Interaction between prion protein and toxic amyloid β assemblies can be therapeutically targeted at multiple sites

    Darragh B. Freir;Andrew J. Nicoll;Igor Klyubin;Silvia Panico

  • Binding and hydrolysis of nucleotides in the chaperonin catalytic cycle: Implications for the mechanism of assisted protein folding

    Graham S. Jackson;Rosemary A. Staniforth;David J. Halsall;Tony Atkinson

  • Disease-Associated Prion Protein Oligomers Inhibit the 26S Proteasome

    Mark Kristiansen;Pelagia Deriziotis;Derek E. Dimcheff;Graham S. Jackson

  • AN INTEGRATED KINETIC ANALYSIS OF INTERMEDIATES AND TRANSITION STATES IN PROTEIN FOLDING REACTIONS

    Martin J. Parker;James Spencer;Anthony R. Clarke

  • The ecology of Bactrocera tryoni (Diptera: Tephritidae): what do we know to assist pest management?

    Anthony R. Clarke;Anthony R. Clarke;Kevin S. Powell;Christopher W. Weldon;Phillip W. Taylor

  • Short elastin-like peptides exhibit the same temperature-induced structural transitions as elastin polymers: implications for protein engineering.

    Herald Reiersen;Anthony R Clarke;Anthony R Rees

  • The human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 E2 protein induces apoptosis in the absence of other HPV proteins and via a p53-dependent pathway.

    Kenneth Webster;Joanna L Parish;Maya Pandya;Peter L Stern

  • Site-directed mutagenesis reveals role of mobile arginine residue in lactate dehydrogenase catalysis

    Anthony R. Clarke;Dale B. Wigley;William N. Chia;David Barstow

  • The origins and consequences of asymmetry in the chaperonin reaction cycle

    Steven G. Burston;Neil A. Ranson;Anthony R. Clarke

  • Prion neuropathology follows the accumulation of alternate prion protein isoforms after infective titre has peaked

    Malin K Sandberg;Huda Al-Doujaily;Bernadette Sharps;Michael Wiggins De Oliveira

  • Binding of a chaperonin to the folding intermediates of lactate dehydrogenase

    Ian G. Badcoe;Corinne J. Smith;Steven Wood;David J. Halsall

  • Structural mobility of the human prion protein probed by backbone hydrogen exchange.

    L L Hosszu;N J Baxter;G S Jackson;A Power

Frequent Co-Authors

J. John Holbrook
J. John Holbrook University of Bristol
Richard B. Sessions
Richard B. Sessions University of Bristol
John Collinge
John Collinge University College London
Jonathan P. Waltho
Jonathan P. Waltho University of Sheffield
Dale B. Wigley
Dale B. Wigley Imperial College London
Peter R. Shewry
Peter R. Shewry Rothamsted Research
Helen R. Saibil
Helen R. Saibil Birkbeck, University of London
Christopher E. Dempsey
Christopher E. Dempsey University of Bristol
William Chia
William Chia National University of Singapore
Arthur S. Tatham
Arthur S. Tatham Cardiff Metropolitan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can open doors to numerous online degree programs and healthcare careers. Many students start with foundational courses, such as medical assistant courses online, which offer flexible learning and financial aid options. These programs are ideal if you're looking for entry-level healthcare roles while building a strong scientific background.

For those seeking career advancement, bridging programs like ma to lpn allow medical assistants to become licensed practical nurses, creating opportunities for higher earnings and more responsibility. If you want to pursue core scientific study, online biology programs can lead to advanced roles in research, education, or laboratory work.

Another common pathway is earning an Associate of Science in Nursing. Accessible options like an online asn program allow students to integrate science studies with practical healthcare skills. No matter which path you choose, online degree options make it easier to balance education with your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony R. Clarke

Recently Published Articles