World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
62
Citations
14574
World Ranking
3132
National Ranking
1466

Anil Chandraker publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anil Chandraker sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 241 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Anil Chandraker D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anil Chandraker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Effects of explosive brain death on cytokine activation of peripheral organs in the rat.

    Moriatsu Takada;Kari C. Nadeau;Wayne W. Hancock;Harald S. Mackenzie

  • Role of the PD-1 Pathway in the Immune Response

    Leonardo V. Riella;Alison M. Paterson;Arlene H. Sharpe;Anil Chandraker

  • Extrathymic T Cell Deletion and Allogeneic Stem Cell Engraftment Induced with Costimulatory Blockade Is Followed by Central T Cell Tolerance

    Thomas Wekerle;Mohamed H. Sayegh;Joshua Hill;Yong Zhao

  • Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report.

    Anat R. Tambur;Patricia Campbell;Frans H. Claas;Sandy Feng

  • The role of the B7 costimulatory pathway in experimental cold ischemia/reperfusion injury.

    Moriatsu Takada;Anil Chandraker;Kari C. Nadeau;Mohamed H. Sayegh

  • CD28-B7 costimulatory blockade by CTLA4Ig prevents actively induced experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and inhibits Th1 but spares Th2 cytokines in the central nervous system.

    S J Khoury;E Akalin;A Chandraker;L A Turka

  • The Programmed Death-1 Ligand 1:B7-1 Pathway Restrains Diabetogenic Effector T Cells In Vivo

    Alison M. Paterson;Keturah E. Brown;Mary E. Keir;Vijay K. Vanguri

  • Inhibition of CD26/dipeptidyl peptidase IV activity in vivo prolongs cardiac allograft survival in rat recipients

    S. Korom;I. De Meester;T. H. W. Stadlbauer;A. Chandraker

  • Blockade of T-cell costimulation prevents development of experimental chronic renal allograft rejection

    Haruhito Azuma;Anil Chandraker;Kari Nadeau;Wayne W. Hancock

  • CD28-B7 blockade prevents the development of experimental autoimmune glomerulonephritis

    John Reynolds;Frederick W.K. Tam;Anil Chandraker;Jennifer Smith

  • The APOL1 genotype of African American kidney transplant recipients does not impact 5-year allograft survival.

    B. T Lee;V Kumar;T. A Williams;R Abdi

  • The Novel Costimulatory Programmed Death Ligand 1/B7.1 Pathway Is Functional in Inhibiting Alloimmune Responses In Vivo

    Jun Yang;Leonardo V. Riella;Leonardo V. Riella;Susanne Chock;Susanne Chock;Tao Liu;Tao Liu

  • Integrated Kidney Exosome Analysis for the Detection of Kidney Transplant Rejection.

    Jongmin Park;Hsing-Ying Lin;Jean Pierre Assaker;Sangmoo Jeong

  • Anti-CD154 or CTLA4Ig obviates the need for thymic irradiation in a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen for the induction of mixed hematopoietic chimerism and tolerance.

    Thomas Wekerle;Mohamed H. Sayegh;Hiroshi Ito;Joshua Hill

  • Deleterious Effect of CTLA4‐Ig on a Treg‐Dependent Transplant Model

    L. V. Riella;T. Liu;J. Yang;S. Chock

  • Cutting Edge: Recipient MHC Class II Expression Is Required to Achieve Long-Term Survival of Murine Cardiac Allografts After Costimulatory Blockade

    Akira Yamada;Anil Chandraker;Terri M. Laufer;Andrea J. Gerth

  • CD28-b7 blockade in organ dysfunction secondary to cold ischemia/reperfusion injury

    Anil Chandraker;Moriatsu Takada;Kari C. Nadeau;Robert Peach

  • Neural stem/progenitor cells express costimulatory molecules that are differentially regulated by inflammatory and apoptotic stimuli.

    Jaime Imitola;Manuel Comabella;Anil K. Chandraker;Fernando Dangond

  • Late blockade of T cell costimulation interrupts progression of experimental chronic allograft rejection.

    A Chandraker;H Azuma;K Nadeau;C B Carpenter

  • The role of HCA2 (GPR109A) in regulating macrophage function

    Kambiz Zandi-Nejad;Ayumi Takakura;Mollie Jurewicz;Anil K. Chandraker

Frequent Co-Authors

Mohamed H. Sayegh
Mohamed H. Sayegh American University of Beirut
Stefan G. Tullius
Stefan G. Tullius Brigham and Women's Hospital
Nader Najafian
Nader Najafian Brigham and Women's Hospital
Helmut G. Rennke
Helmut G. Rennke Brigham and Women's Hospital
Laurence A. Turka
Laurence A. Turka Harvard University
Jerzy W. Kupiec-Weglinski
Jerzy W. Kupiec-Weglinski University of California, Los Angeles
Wayne W. Hancock
Wayne W. Hancock University of Pennsylvania
Peter S. Heeger
Peter S. Heeger Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Samia J. Khoury
Samia J. Khoury American University of Beirut
Charles B. Carpenter
Charles B. Carpenter Brigham and Women's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Anil Chandraker

Recently Published Articles