World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
59
Citations
20538
World Ranking
3202
National Ranking
1393

Alexander Marson publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Marson sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 153 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Alexander Marson D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Marson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Marson is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on immunology, molecular biology, and oncology, with an emphasis on T-cell biology and immune system interactions.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Inhibitory CD161 receptor identified in glioma-infiltrating T cells by single-cell analysis, 2021, Cell
  • Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serology assays reveals a range of test performance, 2020, Nature Biotechnology
  • Genome-wide CRISPR screens of T cell exhaustion identify chromatin remodeling factors that limit T cell persistence, 2022, Cancer Cell
  • CRISPR activation and interference screens decode stimulation responses in primary human T cells, 2022, Science
  • Test performance evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serological assays, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Frequent co-authors working with Marson include:

  • Theodore L. Roth
  • Zhongmei Li
  • Brian R. Shy
  • Eric Shifrut
  • Chun Ye

The scientist publishes regularly in several research venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature
  • Nature Biotechnology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Cell Reports

Marson's work spans several main fields of study:

  • Immunology and Microbiology
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their contributions focus on specific subfields including:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Oncology
  • Genetics
  • Epidemiology

Key topics addressed in their research comprise:

  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • HIV Research and Treatment

Best Publications

  • Genetic and Epigenetic Fine-Mapping of Causal Autoimmune Disease Variants

    Kyle Kai How Farh;Alexander Marson;Jiang Zhu;Markus Kleinewietfeld

  • Connecting microrna genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells

    Rudolph Jaenisch;Richard A. Young;Alexander Marson;Stuart Levine

  • Multiplexed droplet single-cell RNA-sequencing using natural genetic variation

    Hyun Min Kang;Meena Subramaniam;Sasha Targ;Michelle Nguyen

  • Foxp3 occupancy and regulation of key target genes during T-cell stimulation

    Alexander Marson;Karsten Kretschmer;Garrett M. Frampton;Elizabeth S. Jacobsen

  • Reprogramming human T cell function and specificity with non-viral genome targeting

    Theodore L. Roth;Cristina Puig-Saus;Ruby Yu;Ruby Yu;Eric Shifrut;Eric Shifrut

  • Generation of knock-in primary human T cells using Cas9 ribonucleoproteins.

    Kathrin Schumann;Steven Lin;Eric Boyer;Dimitre R. Simeonov

  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances anti-tumor efficacy of human chimeric antigen receptor T cells.

    Levi J. Rupp;Kathrin Schumann;Kole T. Roybal;Rachel E. Gate

  • Revisiting IL-2: Biology and therapeutic prospects

    Abul K. Abbas;Eleonora Trotta;Dimitre R. Simeonov;Alexander Marson

  • Wnt signaling promotes reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency

    Alexander Marson;Ruth Foreman;Brett Chevalier;Steve Bilodeau

  • Enhancer connectome in primary human cells identifies target genes of disease-associated DNA elements

    Maxwell R Mumbach;Ansuman T Satpathy;Evan A Boyle;Chao Dai

  • Genome-wide CRISPR Screens in Primary Human T Cells Reveal Key Regulators of Immune Function

    Eric Shifrut;Eric Shifrut;Julia Carnevale;Victoria Tobin;Victoria Tobin;Theodore L. Roth;Theodore L. Roth

  • Inhibitory CD161 receptor identified in glioma-infiltrating T cells by single-cell analysis

    Nathan D. Mathewson;Orr Ashenberg;Itay Tirosh;Simon Gritsch;Simon Gritsch

  • A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies a restricted set of HIV host dependency factors.

    Ryan J Park;Tim Wang;Dylan Koundakjian;Judd F Hultquist

  • Discovery of stimulation-responsive immune enhancers with CRISPR activation

    Dimitre R. Simeonov;Benjamin G. Gowen;Mandy Boontanrart;Theodore L. Roth

  • Transcriptional role of cyclin D1 in development revealed by a genetic–proteomic screen

    Frédéric Bienvenu;Siwanon Jirawatnotai;Siwanon Jirawatnotai;Joshua E. Elias;Joshua E. Elias;Clifford A. Meyer

  • Landscape of stimulation-responsive chromatin across diverse human immune cells.

    Diego Calderon;Michelle L. T. Nguyen;Anja Mezger;Anja Mezger;Arwa Kathiria

  • Small-molecule RORγt antagonists inhibit T helper 17 cell transcriptional network by divergent mechanisms.

    Sheng Xiao;Nir Yosef;Jianfei Yang;Yonghui Wang

  • The chromatin-modifying enzyme Ezh2 is critical for the maintenance of regulatory T cell identity after activation.

    Michel DuPage;Gaurav Chopra;Jason Quiros;Wendy L. Rosenthal

  • Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 serology assays reveals a range of test performance.

    Jeffrey D. Whitman;Joseph Hiatt;Cody T. Mowery;Brian R. Shy

  • CRISPR/Cas9-mediated PD-1 disruption enhances anti-tumor efficacy of human chimeric antigen receptor T cells

    Levi Rupp;Kathrin Schumann;Kole T Roybal;Alexander Marson

Frequent Co-Authors

Nevan J. Krogan
Nevan J. Krogan University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey A. Bluestone
Jeffrey A. Bluestone University of California, San Francisco
Jacob E. Corn
Jacob E. Corn ETH Zurich
Mark S. Anderson
Mark S. Anderson University of California, San Francisco
Jennifer A. Doudna
Jennifer A. Doudna University of California, Berkeley
K. Mark Ansel
K. Mark Ansel University of California, San Francisco
William J. Greenleaf
William J. Greenleaf Stanford University
Alan Ashworth
Alan Ashworth University of California, San Francisco
Mark J. Daly
Mark J. Daly Massachusetts General Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Genetics opens doors to a variety of career opportunities in healthcare, research, and related fields. For those interested in the healthcare industry but seeking alternative pathways, several online degrees and certifications can complement a background in genetics or provide viable career options on their own.

For example, professionals looking for flexible, entry-level positions might explore medical billing and coding online courses. These programs offer a fast track to working within healthcare practices and hospitals, focusing on administrative skills vital to the field.

If your interests lean toward patient care, consider exploring nursing colleges with high acceptance rates. Nursing degrees remain in high demand nationwide and can offer stable employment for those seeking a hands-on healthcare role.

Management-oriented students may opt for healthcare administration degree programs. These accelerated online degrees prepare graduates for leadership roles within clinics, hospitals, and research organizations.

For those mindful of cost, pursuing healthcare administration programs that offer affordability without compromising quality can be an excellent decision.

Ultimately, whether your passion lies in research or healthcare administration, a variety of online degrees and training programs can help you build a rewarding career aligned with your interests in genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Marson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles