World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 48 18204 16710 529 509 149 14107

Ailsa D. Hocking publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ailsa D. Hocking between 1977 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ailsa D. Hocking published across 46 years, from 1977 to 2022, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2003. 13 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2003. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 23 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 13 publications
1977 2022

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ailsa D. Hocking: publications per year, 1977 to 2022
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 3
1980 1
1981 2
1982 1
1983 2
1984 1
1985 3
1986 3
1987 2
1988 7
1989 1
1990 2
1991 5
1992 3
1993 4
1994 3
1995 2
1996 2
1997 6
1998 3
1999 6
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 23
2004 4
2005 5
2006 15
2007 8
2008 4
2009 18
2010 4
2011 1
2012 2
2013 0
2014 3
2015 1
2016 0
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 13
Total 171
Download as CSV

Ailsa D. Hocking publications per year - data summary

  • Ailsa D. Hocking, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, has 171 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1977 to 2022.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1977 and the most recent to 2022.
  • The most productive year is 2003, with 23 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1977, 1980, 1982, 1984 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 46 years in the span carry no publications at all (1978, 2013, 2016, 2018 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.4 per year counting only the 39 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2018-2022) hold 13 publications, 8% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1977-1992: 37 publications (2.3 per year); 1993-2008: 91 publications (5.7 per year); 2009-2022: 43 publications (3.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Ailsa D. Hocking publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ailsa D. Hocking sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 147–156 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969 149
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Ailsa D. Hocking publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Ailsa D. Hocking, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, records 149 publications - the 26th percentile of the discipline.
  • 26% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Ailsa D. Hocking, and about 74% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Ailsa D. Hocking ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Ailsa D. Hocking D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ailsa D. Hocking sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718 48
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Ailsa D. Hocking D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Ailsa D. Hocking, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, records 48 D-Index - the 7th percentile of the discipline.
  • 7% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Ailsa D. Hocking, and about 93% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Ailsa D. Hocking ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Ailsa D. Hocking is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their work is situated within a professional research environment known for engaging in a wide spectrum of scientific disciplines.

There is no publicly available record of recent papers authored by Ailsa D. Hocking, including titles, publication years, or venues. Similarly, no documented frequent co-authors or common publication venues are associated with their research output.

Neither book publications nor specific publishers linked to any authored works are recorded. The data also does not specify any main fields of study or subfields, which limits the ability to detail their specialized areas of research.

Likewise, there is no information available about main topics addressed in their research. There are no records of awards or distinctions conferred upon Ailsa D. Hocking, and their professional status is active.

Best Publications

  • Fungi and food spoilage

    John I. Pitt;Ailsa D. Hocking

  • Dichloran-rose bengal medium for enumeration and isolation of molds from foods.

    A D King;A D Hocking;J I Pitt

  • Dichloran-glycerol medium for enumeration of xerophilic fungi from low-moisture foods.

    A D Hocking;J I Pitt

  • Fungi and Food Spilage

    S. P. Meyers;John I. Pitt;Ailsa D. Hocking

  • An improved medium for the detection of Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus

    J.I. Pitt;Ailsa D. Hocking;Diane R. Glenn

  • Microbiology of wheat and flour milling in Australia.

    Lana K Berghofer;Ailsa D Hocking;Di Miskelly;Edward Jansson

  • Is there a common water-activity limit for the three domains of life?

    Andrew Stevenson;Jonathan A. Cray;Jim P. Williams;Ricardo Santos

  • Inactivation of food spoilage fungi by ultra violet (UVC) irradiation.

    Mariam Begum;Ailsa D. Hocking;Di Miskelly

  • Influence of temperature, water activity and pH on growth of some xerophilic fungi.

    Melissa A Gock;Ailsa D Hocking;John I Pitt;Peter G Poulos

  • Australian research on ochratoxigenic fungi and ochratoxin A.

    S.L. Leong;A.D. Hocking;A.D. Hocking;J.I. Pitt;B.A. Kazi

  • Occurrence of fruit rot fungi (Aspergillus section Nigri) on some drying varieties of irrigated grapes

    Su-Lin Leong;Ailsa D. Hocking;J.I. Pitt

  • Fungal Planet description sheets: 1042-1111

    P. W. Crous;M. J. Wingfield;Y. H. Chooi;C. L. M. Gilchrist

  • Growth of fungi and mycotoxin production on cheese under modified atmospheres

    M.H Taniwaki;A.D Hocking;J.I Pitt;G.H Fleet

  • The normal mycoflora of commodities from Thailand. 2. Beans, rice, small grains and other commodities

    J.I. Pitt;Ailsa D. Hocking;Kanjana Bhudhasamai;Beverly F. Miscamble

  • The normal mycoflora of commodities from Thailand. 1. Nuts and oilseeds.

    J.I. Pitt;Ailsa D. Hocking;Kanjana Bhudhasamai;Beverly F. Miscamble

  • Advances in the predictive modelling of fungal growth in food

    Angela M. Gibson;Ailsa D. Hocking

  • Fungi causing thread mould spoilage of vacuum packaged Cheddar cheese during maturation.

    Ailsa D. Hocking;Margaret Faedo

  • Water relations of some Penicillium species at 25 °C

    Ailsa D. Hocking;J.I. Pitt

  • Effect of temperature and water activity on growth and ochratoxin A production by Australian Aspergillus carbonarius and A. niger isolates on a simulated grape juice medium.

    Su-lin L. Leong;Ailsa D. Hocking;Ailsa D. Hocking;Eileen S. Scott;Eileen S. Scott

  • Growth and mycotoxin production by food spoilage fungi under high carbon dioxide and low oxygen atmospheres

    M.H. Taniwaki;A.D. Hocking;J.I. Pitt;G.H. Fleet

Frequent Co-Authors

John I. Pitt
John I. Pitt Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Eileen S. Scott
Eileen S. Scott University of Adelaide
Graham H. Fleet
Graham H. Fleet University of New South Wales
Roger G. Shivas
Roger G. Shivas University of Southern Queensland
Robert A. Samson
Robert A. Samson Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute
Antonio J. Ramos
Antonio J. Ramos University of Lleida
Sonia Marín
Sonia Marín University of Lleida
Vicente Sanchis
Vicente Sanchis University of Lleida
Ulf Thrane
Ulf Thrane Technical University of Denmark
Peter Conrad Healy
Peter Conrad Healy Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Biology and Biochemistry open doors to a wide range of healthcare and science careers. Many related fields now offer flexible online degree options, making it easier than ever to launch or advance your career while balancing other commitments.

For those interested in nutrition and health, finding the cheapest online master's in nutrition can be a smart step. These programs combine biochemistry, health sciences, and dietetics to prepare graduates for roles as nutritionists and health educators.

Hands-on fields like medical imaging are also accessible online. Accredited ultrasound tech programs online let students study anatomy, patient care, and imaging technology to become ultrasound technologists. Another affordable option is earning a degree through the cheapest radiology tech programs, which helps students start a career in radiologic technology or medical imaging.

If your focus is on advanced dietetics, exploring the top dietetics programs in the us online can help you qualify as a registered dietitian or nutrition specialist. These degrees combine biological sciences and patient-focused care, setting graduates up for rewarding opportunities in healthcare, public health, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Ailsa D. Hocking

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles