World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
28585
World Ranking
16972
National Ranking
711

Abhijit Guha publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abhijit Guha sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 222 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Abhijit Guha D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abhijit Guha sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Abhijit Guha was affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research spanned Business, Management and Accounting as well as Engineering, with a significant focus on Marketing and Artificial Intelligence. Their scholarly work reflected a blend of these disciplines, covering topics such as AI in service interactions, digital marketing and social media, consumer retail behavior studies, blockchain technology applications and security, technology adoption and user behaviour, ethics and social impacts of AI, and consumer behavior in brand consumption and identification.

Guha's publication record included a range of papers predominantly published between 2021 and 2023. Notable papers comprised:

  • How artificial intelligence will affect the future of retailing, 2021, Journal of Retailing
  • How artificiality and intelligence affect voice assistant evaluations, 2022, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Generative AI and Marketing Education: What the Future Holds, 2023, Journal of Marketing Education

Their research often intersected with other scholars, frequently coauthoring with individuals such as Dhruv Grewal, Cinthia B. Satornino, Elisa B. Schweiger, Krushna Mohan Das, and Marc Becker.

Guha published multiple papers in key academic journals including:

  • Journal of Retailing
  • Journal of Business Research
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
  • Journal of Marketing Education
  • Journal of Macromarketing

Their work addressed core themes in the marketing and technology landscape, contributing to the understanding of how artificial intelligence impacts retail and consumer interactions, as well as exploring ethical and social implications associated with these technologies.

Best Publications

  • The Somatic Genomic Landscape of Glioblastoma

    Cameron W. Brennan;Roel G W Verhaak;Aaron McKenna;Benito Campos

  • Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma

    Jeremy Schwartzentruber;Andrey Korshunov;Xiao Yang Liu;David T.W. Jones

  • Intercellular transfer of the oncogenic receptor EGFRvIII by microvesicles derived from tumour cells

    Khalid Al-Nedawi;Brian Meehan;Johann Micallef;Vladimir Lhotak

  • How artificial intelligence will change the future of marketing

    Thomas Davenport;Abhijit Guha;Dhruv Grewal;Timna Bressgott

  • Radial glia cells are candidate stem cells of ependymoma

    Michael D. Taylor;Helen Poppleton;Christine Fuller;Xiaoping Su

  • Transforming fusions of FGFR and TACC genes in human glioblastoma

    Devendra Singh;Joseph Minhow Chan;Pietro Zoppoli;Francesco Niola;Francesco Niola

  • Hexokinase 2 is a key mediator of aerobic glycolysis and promotes tumor growth in human glioblastoma multiforme

    Amparo Wolf;Sameer Agnihotri;Johann Micallef;Joydeep Mukherjee

  • Delineation of Two Clinically and Molecularly Distinct Subgroups of Posterior Fossa Ependymoma

    Hendrik Witt;Stephen C. Mack;Marina Ryzhova;Sebastian Bender;Sebastian Bender

  • Expression of PDGF and PDGF receptors in human astrocytoma operation specimens supports the existence of an autocrine loop

    Abhijit Guha;Kathleen Dashner;Peter L. Mc Black;John A. Wagner

  • Proliferation of human malignant astrocytomas is dependent on Ras activation.

    Abhijit Guha;Abhijit Guha;Matthias M Feldkamp;Nelson Lau;Gerry Boss

  • Astrocyte-specific Expression of Activated p21-ras Results in Malignant Astrocytoma Formation in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Human Gliomas

    Hao Ding;Luba Roncari;Luba Roncari;Patrick Shannon;Xiaoli Wu

  • Expression of activated epidermal growth factor receptors, Ras-guanosine triphosphate, and mitogen-activated protein kinase in human glioblastoma multiforme specimens.

    Matthias M. Feldkamp;Prateek Lala;Nelson Lau;Luba Roncari

  • Contrasting in vivo and in vitro fates of glioblastoma cell subpopulations with amplified EGFR.

    Ajay Pandita;Kenneth D. Aldape;Gelareh Zadeh;Abhijit Guha

  • Meningiomas: role of vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor in angiogenesis and peritumoral edema.

    John Provias;Kevin Claffey;Leslie delAguila;Nelson Lau

  • Poor drug distribution as a possible explanation for the results of the PRECISE trial.

    John H. Sampson;Gary Archer;Christoph Pedain;Eva Wembacher-Schröder

  • Beta-catenin regulates wound size and mediates the effect of TGF-beta in cutaneous healing

    Sophia S. Cheon;Qingxia Wei;Ananta Gurung;Andrew Youn

  • Targeting metabolic remodeling in glioblastoma multiforme.

    Amparo Wolf;Sameer Agnihotri;Abhijit Guha

  • Extracellular vesicles – vehicles that spread cancer genes

    Janusz Rak;Abhijit Guha

  • Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors

    Richard G Perrin;Abhijit Guha;Abhijit Guha;Abhijit Guha

  • The somatic genomic landscape of glioblastoma

    Cameron W. Brennan;Roel G. W. Verhaak;Aaron Mckenna;Benito Campos

Frequent Co-Authors

David H. Gutmann
David H. Gutmann Washington University in St. Louis
Cynthia Hawkins
Cynthia Hawkins University of Toronto
Charles H. Tator
Charles H. Tator Toronto Western Hospital
Andras Nagy
Andras Nagy Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
Meena Upadhyaya
Meena Upadhyaya Cardiff University
Mark Bernstein
Mark Bernstein Toronto Western Hospital
Stefan M. Pfister
Stefan M. Pfister German Cancer Research Center
Michael D. Prados
Michael D. Prados University of California, San Francisco
Andrey Korshunov
Andrey Korshunov German Cancer Research Center
Michael D. Taylor
Michael D. Taylor University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine doesn’t always begin with medical school. Many students start with alternative degree pathways in healthcare that offer strong job prospects and a flexible entry point. Nurses, in particular, have several opportunities to advance their education and career online.

For those seeking budget-friendly options, these cheapest bsn programs online allow aspiring nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing while managing costs. Registered Nurses (RNs) who want to boost their credentials can consider affordable rn to bsn programs to complete their bachelor’s degree fully online.

For advanced practice or leadership roles, the cheapest dnp online program options are designed for working professionals who wish to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice at a lower cost. If you hold a non-nursing bachelor’s degree, direct entry msn programs for non nurses online offer a fast-track route to a master’s in nursing.

These online healthcare degrees provide flexibility, affordability, and a wide range of career pathways. They are ideal for students who want to make an impact in medicine without following a traditional route.

Best Scientists Citing Abhijit Guha