World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
62
Citations
19972
World Ranking
2558
National Ranking
1027

A. Scott Denning publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Scott Denning sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

A. Scott Denning D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Scott Denning sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Meteorology
  • Climate change
  • Ecosystem

His primary scientific interests are in Biosphere, Meteorology, Biota, Carbon cycle and Carbon dioxide. A. Scott Denning has included themes like Water balance and Climate model in his Meteorology study. The various areas that A. Scott Denning examines in his Biota study include Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere, Trace gas and Northern Hemisphere.

His research integrates issues of Biogeochemical cycle and Greenhouse gas in his study of Carbon cycle. A. Scott Denning has researched Greenhouse gas in several fields, including Carbon sequestration and Atmospheric models. As a member of one scientific family, A. Scott Denning mostly works in the field of Ecosystem, focusing on Soil water and, on occasion, Vegetation and Biosphere model.

His most cited work include:

  • The Common Land Model (902 citations)
  • Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2 (602 citations)
  • Latitudinal gradient of atmospheric CO 2 due to seasonal exchange with land biota (335 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

A. Scott Denning mainly investigates Meteorology, Biosphere, Carbon cycle, Carbon dioxide and Biosphere model. His Meteorology research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Sampling and Spatial distribution. His work deals with themes such as Climate change, Carbon dioxide in Earth's atmosphere, Eddy covariance and Atmospheric model, which intersect with Biosphere.

A. Scott Denning combines subjects such as Soil water, Sink, Vegetation and Greenhouse gas with his study of Carbon cycle. His study in Carbon dioxide is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Northern Hemisphere and Trace gas. His research is interdisciplinary, bridging the disciplines of Biota and Northern Hemisphere.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Meteorology (35.21%)
  • Biosphere (29.58%)
  • Carbon cycle (19.72%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Carbon cycle (19.72%)
  • Precipitation (12.68%)
  • Meteorology (35.21%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Carbon cycle, Precipitation, Meteorology, Climate change and Simple. His Phenology research extends to Carbon cycle, which is thematically connected. The study incorporates disciplines such as Sensible heat, Bowen ratio and Biosphere model in addition to Precipitation.

The concepts of his Bowen ratio study are interwoven with issues in Dry season, Moisture recycling, Seasonality and Water content. His studies deal with areas such as Carbon sequestration, Greenhouse gas and Co2 concentration as well as Meteorology. His studies in Climate change integrate themes in fields like Atmospheric composition, Ecosystem and Hydrology.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Impact of Evapotranspiration on Dry Season Climate in the Amazon Forest (32 citations)
  • Estimate of carbonyl sulfide tropical oceanic surface fluxes using Aura Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer observations (22 citations)
  • An approach for verifying biogenic greenhouse gas emissions inventories with atmospheric CO2 concentration data (19 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Meteorology
  • Carbon dioxide
  • Statistics

A. Scott Denning focuses on Flux, Carbon cycle, Isentropic process, Seasonal cycle and Carbon dioxide. A. Scott Denning integrates many fields, such as Flux and engineering, in his works. His studies deal with areas such as Co2 concentration and Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer as well as Carbon cycle.

His work often combines Isentropic process and Amplitude studies.

Best Publications

  • Modeling the Exchanges of Energy, Water, and Carbon Between Continents and the Atmosphere

    P. J. Sellers;R. E. Dickinson;D. A. Randall;A. K. Betts

  • Recent patterns and mechanisms of carbon exchange by terrestrial ecosystems

    D. S. Schimel;J. I. House;K. A. Hibbard;P. Bousquet

  • The Common Land Model

    Yongjiu Dai;Xubin Zeng;Robert E. Dickinson;Ian Baker

  • Towards robust regional estimates of CO2 sources and sinks using atmospheric transport models.

    K. R. Gurney;R. M. Law;A. S. Denning;P. J. Rayner

  • Weak northern and strong tropical land carbon uptake from vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2

    Britton B. Stephens;Kevin R. Gurney;Pieter P. Tans;Colm Sweeney

  • Interactions between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems: influence on weather and climate

    Roger A. Pielke;Roni Avissar;Michael Raupach;A. Johannes Dolman

  • TransCom 3 inversion intercomparison: Impact of transport model errors on the interannual variability of regional CO2 fluxes, 1988–2003

    D. F. Baker;D. F. Baker;Rachel M. Law;Kevin R. Gurney;Kevin R. Gurney;Peter Rayner

  • Latitudinal gradient of atmospheric CO 2 due to seasonal exchange with land biota

    A. Scott Denning;A. Scott Denning;A. Scott Denning;Inez Y. Fung;Inez Y. Fung;David Randall

  • Precision Requirements for Space-based XCO2 Data

    C. E. Miller;D. Crisp;P. L. DeCola;S. C. Olsen

  • Transcom 3 inversion intercomparison: Model mean results for the estimation of seasonal carbon sources and sinks

    Kevin Robert Gurney;Rachel M. Law;A. Scott Denning;Peter J. Rayner

  • TransCom 3 CO2 inversion intercomparison: 1. Annual mean control results and sensitivity to transport and prior flux information

    Kevin Robert Gurney;Rachel M. Law;A. Scott Denning;Peter J. Rayner

  • Seasonal drought stress in the Amazon: Reconciling models and observations

    I. T. Baker;L. Prihodko;A. S. Denning;M. Goulden

  • TransCom model simulations of hourly atmospheric CO2 : Analysis of synoptic-scale variations for the period 2002-2003

    P. K. Patra;R. M. Law;Wouter Peters;Wouter Peters;C. RöDenbeck

  • An ensemble data assimilation system to estimate CO2 surface fluxes from atmospheric trace gas observations

    Wouter Peters;Wouter Peters;J. B. Miller;J. B. Miller;J. Whitaker;J. Whitaker;A. S. Denning

  • Carbon 13 exchanges between the atmosphere and biosphere

    I. Fung;I. Fung;C. B. Field;J. A. Berry;M. V. Thompson;M. V. Thompson

  • A three‐dimensional synthesis study of δ18O in atmospheric CO2 1. Surface fluxes

    Philippe Ciais;A. Scott Denning;Pieter P. Tans;Joseph A. Berry

  • Simulations of terrestrial carbon metabolism and atmospheric CO2 in a general circulation model: Part 1: Surface carbon fluxes

    A. Scott Denning;G. James Collatz;Changan Zhang;David A. Randall

  • Africa and the global carbon cycle

    Christopher A Williams;Niall P Hanan;Jason C Neff;Robert J Scholes

  • Three-dimensional transport and concentration of SF6 A model intercomparison study (TransCom 2)

    A. Scott Denning;Mark Holzer;Kevin R. Gurney;Martin Heimann

  • Combined Simple Biosphere/Carnegie‐Ames‐Stanford Approach terrestrial carbon cycle model

    Kevin Schaefer;G. James Collatz;Pieter Tans;A. Scott Denning

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Baker
Ian Baker Colorado State University
David A. Randall
David A. Randall Colorado State University
Joseph A. Berry
Joseph A. Berry Carnegie Institution for Science
Kevin R. Gurney
Kevin R. Gurney Northern Arizona University
Kenneth J. Davis
Kenneth J. Davis Pennsylvania State University
Jill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron United States Geological Survey
Martin Heimann
Martin Heimann Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Inez Y. Fung
Inez Y. Fung University of California, Berkeley
Pieter P. Tans
Pieter P. Tans National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
G. James Collatz
G. James Collatz Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from advanced education and specialized training. For professionals looking to deepen their expertise or transition into leadership roles, exploring programs such as a 1 year phd programs online no dissertation can be an attractive option, offering a streamlined path to doctoral credentials without the extensive dissertation requirement.

Many candidates consider a stepwise approach to higher education through options like an eds to edd bridge program, which facilitates a smooth transition from a master's-level education to a doctorate of education. This pathway is particularly valuable for those focused on environmental education, policy, or administration.

For professionals interested in social work aspects within environmental contexts, pursuing a dsw program offers practical skills and leadership training to address community and societal challenges linked to environmental issues.

Additionally, those seeking cost-effective educational routes can explore an online general studies degree affordable, which provides flexible learning paths and foundational knowledge applicable across various environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing A. Scott Denning

Trending Scientists