World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 57 14069 12942 5932 5312 1323 9000

Yinjie J. Tang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yinjie J. Tang between 2005 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yinjie J. Tang published across 22 years, from 2005 to 2026, averaging 9.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2019. 20 of the 212 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2019. 2005: 2 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 8 publications
2005 2026

212 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yinjie J. Tang: publications per year, 2005 to 2026
Year Publications
2005 2
2006 4
2007 12
2008 4
2009 12
2010 14
2011 10
2012 11
2013 9
2014 13
2015 13
2016 13
2017 14
2018 6
2019 23
2020 7
2021 7
2022 0
2023 9
2024 9
2025 12
2026 8
Total 212
Download as CSV

Yinjie J. Tang publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yinjie J. Tang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,028+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 1,323 publications — 100th percentile

100% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100 1,323
Download as CSV

Yinjie J. Tang D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yinjie J. Tang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235 57
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yinjie J. Tang is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis, United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a focus on topics related to microbial metabolic engineering, bioproduction, and synthetic biology, intersecting broader fields such as Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Physics and Astronomy.

The scientist's work is prominently published across several academic venues, including:

  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Current Opinion in Biotechnology
  • Metabolic Engineering
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • ACS Synthetic Biology

Yinjie J. Tang has contributed to multiple research topics, including:

  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion

Their subfields of study encompass:

  • Geophysics
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Among the frequent coauthors working alongside Yinjie J. Tang are:

  • Héctor García Martín
  • Marcus Foston
  • Amity Andersen
  • Ali Chamas
  • Jialiang Zhang

Selected recent papers by Yinjie J. Tang include:

  • Integrated knowledge mining, genome-scale modeling, and machine learning for predicting Yarrowia lipolytica bioproduction, 2021, Metabolic Engineering
  • Generative Artificial Intelligence GPT-4 Accelerates Knowledge Mining and Machine Learning for Synthetic Biology, 2023, ACS Synthetic Biology
  • Biosystem design of Corynebacterium glutamicum for bioproduction, 2022, Current Opinion in Biotechnology
  • Biosynthesis of terpene compounds using the non-model yeast Yarrowia lipolytica: grand challenges and a few perspectives, 2020, Current Opinion in Biotechnology
  • Artificial intelligence: a solution to involution of design-build-test-learn cycle, 2022, Current Opinion in Biotechnology

Best Publications

  • Metabolic Burden: Cornerstones in Synthetic Biology and Metabolic Engineering Applications

    Gang Wu;Qiang Yan;J. Andrew Jones;Yinjie J. Tang

  • Engineering microbial consortia by division of labor

    Garrett W. Roell;Jian Zha;Rhiannon R. Carr;Mattheos A. Koffas

  • Charge-Associated Effects of Fullerene Derivatives on Microbial Structural Integrity and Central Metabolism

    Yinjie J. Tang;Jared M. Ashcroft;Ding Chen;Guangwei Min

  • Comparative Eco-Toxicities of Nano-ZnO Particles under Aquatic and Aerosol Exposure Modes

    Bing Wu;Yin Wang;Yi Hsuan Lee;Angela Horst

  • Metabolic Engineering of Synechocystis sp. Strain PCC 6803 for Isobutanol Production

    Arul M. Varman;Yi Xiao;Himadri B. Pakrasi;Yinjie J. Tang

  • Phytotoxicity of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles is Related to Both Dissolved Metals Ions and Adsorption of Particles on Seed Surfaces

    Yinjie J Tang;Stephen G Wu;Li Huang;Jennifer Head

  • Anti-microbial activities of aerosolized transition metal oxide nanoparticles

    Zhipeng Wang;Yi-Hsuan Lee;Bing Wu;Angela Horst

  • Development of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 as a phototrophic cell factory.

    Yi Yu;Le You;Dianyi Liu;Whitney Hollinshead

  • Bacterial responses to Cu-doped TiO2 nanoparticles

    Bing Wu;Rick Huang;Manoranjan Sahu;Xueyang Feng

  • Advances in analysis of microbial metabolic fluxes via 13C isotopic labeling

    Yinjie J. Tang;Hector Garcia Martin;Hector Garcia Martin;Samuel Myers;Sarah Rodriguez

  • Central metabolic responses to the overproduction of fatty acids in Escherichia coli based on 13C‐metabolic flux analysis

    Lian He;Yi Xiao;Nikodimos Gebreselassie;Fuzhong Zhang

  • Photoautotrophic production of D-lactic acid in an engineered cyanobacterium.

    Arul M Varman;Yi Yu;Yi Yu;Le You;Yinjie J Tang

  • Pathway confirmation and flux analysis of central metabolic pathways in Desulfovibrio vulgaris hildenborough using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry

    Yinjie Tang;Francesco Pingitore;Aindrila Mukhopadhyay;Richard Phan

  • Carbon metabolic pathways in phototrophic bacteria and their broader evolutionary implications.

    Kuo-Hsiang Tang;Yinjie J. Tang;Robert Eugene Blankenship

  • Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 Fluxome under Various Oxygen Conditions

    Yinjie J. Tang;Judy S. Hwang;David E. Wemmer;Jay D. Keasling;Jay D. Keasling

  • Incomplete Wood–Ljungdahl pathway facilitates one-carbon metabolism in organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoides mccartyi

    Wei Qin Zhuang;Shan Yi;Markus Bill;Vanessa L. Brisson

  • Separation and mass spectrometry in microbial metabolomics.

    David E Garcia;Edward E Baidoo;Peter I Benke;Peter I Benke;Francesco Pingitore

  • Anaerobic Central Metabolic Pathways in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 Reinterpreted in the Light of Isotopic Metabolite Labeling

    Yinjie J. Tang;Adam L. Meadows;James Kirby;Jay D. Keasling

  • A kinetic model describing Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 growth, substrate consumption, and product secretion.

    Yinjie J. Tang;Yinjie J. Tang;Adam L. Meadows;Jay D. Keasling

  • Mixotrophic and photoheterotrophic metabolism in Cyanothece sp. ATCC 51142 under continuous light

    Xueyang Feng;Anindita Bandyopadhyay;Bert Berla;Lawrence Page

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay D. Keasling
Jay D. Keasling University of California, Berkeley
Himadri B. Pakrasi
Himadri B. Pakrasi Washington University in St. Louis
Lisa Alvarez-Cohen
Lisa Alvarez-Cohen University of California, Berkeley
Edward E. K. Baidoo
Edward E. K. Baidoo Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Robert E. Blankenship
Robert E. Blankenship Washington University in St. Louis
Aindrila Mukhopadhyay
Aindrila Mukhopadhyay Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Terry C. Hazen
Terry C. Hazen University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Yixin Chen
Yixin Chen Washington University in St. Louis
Mattheos A. G. Koffas
Mattheos A. G. Koffas Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Pratim Biswas
Pratim Biswas University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Graduates with a background in Biology or Biochemistry are well-positioned for diverse online degree and career opportunities. Many choose to specialize further with certifications related to health information, such as medical coding certification. This credential can open doors in both private clinics and large hospitals. It’s important to compare available options to understand key differences in cost, job responsibilities, and potential earnings.

For those interested in job security and competitive wages, consider exploring medical coding jobs salary data. The demand for skilled medical coders and billers continues to grow, fueled by the expanding healthcare industry. This makes it a smart choice for candidates seeking strong job prospects and advancement opportunities.

If you’re wondering, is medical billing and coding in demand? The answer is yes—there is a steady need for professionals who can accurately manage patients’ health information.

Those looking for an affordable and flexible route can also explore a bachelor's degree health information management. This degree can further expand career opportunities in medical administration, informatics, and leadership roles within healthcare facilities.

Best Scientists Citing Yinjie J. Tang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles