World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William E. Friedman

William E. Friedman

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
43
Citations
5439
World Ranking
3326
National Ranking
836

William E. Friedman publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 95 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

William E. Friedman D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William E. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1989 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For many contributions to the understanding of statistical decay products of heavyion collisions, especially those involving finalstate interactions

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Gene
  • Flowering plant

William E. Friedman mainly investigates Botany, Endosperm, Gametophyte, Embryo and Ploidy. His study in the field of Double fertilization is also linked to topics like Phalaenopsis amabilis. As a member of one scientific family, William E. Friedman mostly works in the field of Double fertilization, focusing on Sperm and, on occasion, Human fertilization, Arabidopsis thaliana, Pollen, Arabidopsis and Pollen tube.

His work carried out in the field of Endosperm brings together such families of science as Character evolution and Ontogeny. The study incorporates disciplines such as Lycopodium, Austrobaileyales, Hydatellaceae and Nymphaeales in addition to Gametophyte. His Phylogenetics study combines topics in areas such as Gnetum and Sexual reproduction.

His most cited work include:

  • The meaning of Darwin’s “abominable mystery” (148 citations)
  • The evolution of plant development (123 citations)
  • Expression of the cell cycle in sperm of Arabidopsis: implications for understanding patterns of gametogenesis and fertilization in plants and other eukaryotes (120 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Gametophyte, Endosperm, Double fertilization and Nymphaeales. Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Phylogenetic tree and Botany. His Gametophyte research includes elements of Sporophyte, Heterochrony, Ontogeny, Evolutionary biology and Ginkgo biloba.

His Endosperm research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Phylogenetics, Basal angiosperms, Ploidy and Germination. His Double fertilization research incorporates themes from Sexual reproduction, Gnetum, Gnetum gnemon, Embryo and Human fertilization. William E. Friedman has included themes like Hydatellaceae, Trimeniaceae, Nymphaea thermarum, Flowering plant and Austrobaileyales in his Nymphaeales study.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (77.78%)
  • Gametophyte (35.56%)
  • Endosperm (35.56%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • Botany (77.78%)
  • Endosperm (35.56%)
  • Nymphaeales (17.78%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

William E. Friedman focuses on Botany, Endosperm, Nymphaeales, Ovule and Flowering plant. His studies in Botany integrate themes in fields like Spatial ecology and Ecology. His research in Endosperm intersects with topics in Dormancy, Germination and Double fertilization.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Ploidy and Human fertilization. His work carried out in the field of Nymphaeales brings together such families of science as Basal angiosperms and Nymphaea thermarum. William E. Friedman interconnects Evolutionary biology and Austrobaileyales in the investigation of issues within Flowering plant.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Spatial structuring of bacterial communities within individual Ginkgo biloba trees. (59 citations)
  • Embryology in Trithuria submersa (Hydatellaceae) and relationships between embryo, endosperm, and perisperm in early-diverging flowering plants. (22 citations)
  • Floral biology and ovule and seed ontogeny of Nymphaea thermarum, a water lily at the brink of extinction with potential as a model system for basal angiosperms (21 citations)

Best Publications

  • The meaning of Darwin’s “abominable mystery”

    William E. Friedman

  • The evolution of plant development

    William E. Friedman;Richard C. Moore;Michael D. Purugganan

  • Identification of diploid endosperm in an early angiosperm lineage

    Joseph H. Williams;William E. Friedman

  • Expression of the cell cycle in sperm of Arabidopsis: implications for understanding patterns of gametogenesis and fertilization in plants and other eukaryotes

    William E. Friedman

  • SHOOTLESSNESS, VELAMENTOUS ROOTS, AND THE PRE-EMINENCE OF ORCHIDACEAE IN THE EPIPHYTIC BIOTOPE.

    D. H. Benzing;W. E. Friedman;G. Peterson;A. Renfrow

  • Double fertilization in ephedra, a nonflowering seed plant: its bearing on the origin of angiosperms.

    William E. Friedman

  • A laccase-like phenoloxidase is correlated with lignin biosynthesis in Zinnia elegans stem tissues

    Lan Liu;Jeffrey F.D. Dean;William E. Friedman;Karl-Erik L. Eriksson

  • The evolution of double fertilization and endosperm: an ”historical” perspective

    William E. Friedman

  • The four-celled female gametophyte of Illicium (Illiciaceae; Austrobaileyales): implications for understanding the origin and early evolution of monocots, eumagnoliids,and eudicots

    Joseph H. Williams;William E. Friedman

  • Roots of Sobralia macrantha (Orchidaceae): structure and function of the velamen-exodermis complex.

    D. H. Benzing;D. W. Ott;W. E. Friedman

  • Evolution of Endosperm Developmental Patterns among Basal Flowering Plants

    Sandra K. Floyd;William E. Friedman

  • Spatial structuring of bacterial communities within individual Ginkgo biloba trees.

    Jonathan W. Leff;Jonathan W. Leff;Peter Del Tredici;William E. Friedman;Noah Fierer;Noah Fierer

  • Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in Lycopodiaceae.

    Jennifer L. Winther;William E. Friedman

  • Physcomitrella cyclin-dependent kinase A links cell cycle reactivation to other cellular changes during reprogramming of leaf cells.

    Masaki Ishikawa;Takashi Murata;Takashi Murata;Yoshikatsu Sato;Tomoaki Nishiyama;Tomoaki Nishiyama

  • Reconstructing the ancestral female gametophyte of angiosperms: Insights from Amborella and other ancient lineages of flowering plants

    William E. Friedman;Kirsten C. Ryerson

  • Female gametophyte and early seed development in Peperomia (Piperaceae)

    Eric N. Madrid;William E. Friedman

  • Evidence of a pre-angiosperm origin of endosperm: implications for the evolution of flowering plants.

    William E. Friedman

  • Developmental Selection within the Angiosperm Style: Using Gamete DNA to Visualize Interspecific Pollen Competition

    J. H. Williams;W. E. Friedman;M. L. Arnold

  • The origin and early evolution of tracheids in vascular plants: integration of palaeobotanical and neobotanical data

    William E. Friedman;Martha E. Cook

  • Embryological evidence for developmental lability during early angiosperm evolution

    William E. Friedman

  • The evolution of embryogeny in seed plants and the developmental origin and early history of endosperm

    William E. Friedman

  • GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE MALE GAMETOPHYTE OF GINKGO BILOBA WITHIN THE OVULE (IN VIVO)

    William E. Friedman

Frequent Co-Authors

José I. Hormaza
José I. Hormaza Spanish National Research Council
Mitsuyasu Hasebe
Mitsuyasu Hasebe The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI
Jonathan W. Leff
Jonathan W. Leff University of Colorado Boulder
Noah Fierer
Noah Fierer University of Colorado Boulder
Charles C. Davis
Charles C. Davis Harvard University
Tomoaki Nishiyama
Tomoaki Nishiyama Kanazawa University
Peter K. Endress
Peter K. Endress University of Zurich
Ernest M. Gifford
Ernest M. Gifford University of California, Davis
Michael D. Purugganan
Michael D. Purugganan New York University
Vivian F. Irish
Vivian F. Irish Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing William E. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles