World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
50
Citations
9586
World Ranking
4980
National Ranking
379

Thomas R. Anderson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas R. Anderson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Anderson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas R. Anderson is affiliated with the National Oceanography Centre in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within Earth and Planetary Sciences, Environmental Science, and Physics and Astronomy, with a particular focus on oceanographic and marine systems. The primary subfields of study associated with Anderson include Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, and Ecology.

The main topics covered by Anderson's work are as follows:

  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies
  • Particle Detector Development and Performance
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses
  • Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies

Anderson's recent publications highlight their contributions across a variety of ecological and oceanographic themes. Notable papers include:

  • "Validation of three-dimensional hydrodynamic models of the Gulf of Finland" (2024) published in BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway))
  • "Ocean carbon sequestration: Particle fragmentation by copepods as a significant unrecognised factor?" (2020) published in BioEssays
  • "Geometric Stoichiometry: Unifying Concepts of Animal Nutrition to Understand How Protein-Rich Diets Can Be "Too Much of a Good Thing"" (2020) published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Phytoplankton acclimation to changing light intensity in a turbulent mixed layer: A Lagrangian modelling study" (2020) published in Ecological Modelling
  • "Is the growth of marine copepods limited by food quantity or quality?" (2021) published in Limnology and Oceanography Letters

The scientist frequently publishes in journals such as Frontiers in Marine Science, Journal of Instrumentation, arXiv (Cornell University), BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)), and BioEssays.

Collaboration has been a notable aspect of Anderson's work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Daniel J. Mayor
  • Wendy C. Gentleman
  • Dag O. Hessen
  • Andrew Yool
  • F. M. Addesa

Best Publications

  • CO2, the greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering work of Arrhenius and Callendar to today's Earth System Models.

    Thomas R. Anderson;Ed Hawkins;Philip D. Jones;Philip D. Jones

  • CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN ECOSYSTEMS: THE ROLE OF STOICHIOMETRY

    Dag O. Hessen;Göran I. Ågren;Thomas R. Anderson;James J. Elser

  • Plankton functional type modelling : running before we can walk?

    Thomas R. Anderson

  • Reconciliation of the carbon budget in the ocean’s twilight zone

    Sarah L. C. Giering;Sarah L. C. Giering;Sarah L. C. Giering;Richard Sanders;Richard S. Lampitt;Thomas R. Anderson

  • Mesopelagic zone ecology and biogeochemistry - a synthesis

    Carol Robinson;Deborah K. Steinberg;Thomas R. Anderson;Javier Arístegui

  • MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies

    A. Yool;E. E. Popova;T. R. Anderson

  • Metabolic Stoichiometry and the Fate of Excess Carbon and Nutrients in Consumers

    Thomas R. Anderson;Dag O. Hessen;James J. Elser;Jotaro Urabe

  • Assessing the apparent imbalance between geochemical and biochemical indicators of meso- and bathypelagic biological activity: What the @#! is wrong with present calculations of carbon budgets?

    Adrian B. Burd;Dennis A. Hansell;Deborah K. Steinberg;Thomas R. Anderson

  • Ocean fertilization: a potential means of geoengineering?

    R. S. Lampitt;Eric P. Achterberg;T. R. Anderson;J. A. Hughes

  • Beyond the Durfee square: enhancing the h-index to score total publication output

    Thomas R. Anderson;Robin K. S. Hankin;Peter D. Killworth

  • Excess carbon in aquatic organisms and ecosystems: physiological, ecological, and evolutionary implications

    Dag O. Hessen;Thomas R. Anderson

  • Stoichiometry: Linking elements to biochemicals

    Thomas R. Anderson;Maarten Boersma;David Raubenheimer

  • A dynamic model of oceanic sulfur (DMOS) applied to the Sargasso Sea: Simulating the dimethylsulfide (DMS) summer paradox

    S. M. Vallina;S. M. Vallina;R. Simo;T. R. Anderson;Albert Jerome Gabric

  • Modelling the influence of food C:N ratio, and respiration on growth and nitrogen excretion in marine zooplankton and bacteria

    Thomas R. Anderson

  • Control of primary production in the Arctic by nutrients and light: insights from a high resolution ocean general circulation model

    E. E. Popova;A. Yool;A. C. Coward;Y. K. Aksenov

  • Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models

    Ben A. Ward;Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs;Thomas R. Anderson;Andreas Oschlies

  • Modelling the Seasonal Cycle of Dissolved Organic Carbon at Station E1in the English Channel

    T.R. Anderson;P.J.le B. Williams

  • Microbial loop carbon cycling in ocean environments studied using a simple steady-state model

    Thomas R. Anderson;Hugh W. Ducklow

  • Stoichiometric theory extended to micronutrients: Comparison of the roles of essential fatty acids, carbon, and nitrogen in the nutrition of marine copepods

    Thomas R. Anderson;David W. Pond

  • Carbon or nitrogen limitation in marine copepods

    Thomas R. Anderson;Dag O. Hessen

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Yool
Andrew Yool National Oceanography Centre
Daniel J. Mayor
Daniel J. Mayor University of Exeter
Dag O. Hessen
Dag O. Hessen University of Oslo
Adrian P. Martin
Adrian P. Martin National Oceanography Centre
Richard S. Lampitt
Richard S. Lampitt National Oceanography Centre
David W. Pond
David W. Pond University of Stirling
Erik T. Buitenhuis
Erik T. Buitenhuis University of East Anglia
Bablu Sinha
Bablu Sinha National Oceanography Centre
Andrew C. Coward
Andrew C. Coward National Oceanography Centre
Richard Sanders
Richard Sanders National Oceanography Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences, several online degree options can complement or enhance your expertise. Many professionals start with foundational programs, such as a budget friendly online general studies degree, which offers flexibility and broad knowledge applicable to various environmental fields.

If you're seeking advanced credentials, exploring degree programs like those highlighted in online eds to edd programs can provide leadership skills vital for managing large-scale environmental projects or academic roles.

Social impact is a critical component of environmental work. Pursuing a degree in social work through one of the respected dsw programs online can enhance your ability to address environmental justice and community health concerns.

For individuals looking for a straightforward path, programs listed under easiest bachelor degree to get might offer a quicker, accessible entry into the field, allowing you to start building your career sooner while advancing your education step-by-step.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas R. Anderson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles