World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Viktor I. Korolchuk

Viktor I. Korolchuk

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
45864
World Ranking
14118
National Ranking
1107

Viktor I. Korolchuk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Viktor I. Korolchuk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Viktor I. Korolchuk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Viktor I. Korolchuk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Genetics
  • Apoptosis
  • Biochemistry

Autophagy, Cell biology, Autophagy database, Proteasome and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway are his primary areas of study. His research in Autophagy focuses on subjects like Signal transduction, which are connected to Disease and Cytoplasm. His study in the fields of Senescence and mTORC1 under the domain of Cell biology overlaps with other disciplines such as Apical membrane and Peripheral membrane protein.

His work deals with themes such as Neuroscience and Bioinformatics, which intersect with Autophagy database. Viktor I. Korolchuk has researched Autophagosome in several fields, including Sequestosome 1, Computational biology, Programmed cell death and Physiology. His Computational biology study incorporates themes from MAP1LC3B, Chaperone-mediated autophagy, BECN1 and Autolysosome.

His most cited work include:

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (4170 citations)
  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3242 citations)
  • Regulation of Mammalian Autophagy in Physiology and Pathophysiology (1296 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Cell biology, Autophagy, mTORC1, Biochemistry and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. His Cell biology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Oxidative stress and Cell. Viktor I. Korolchuk specializes in Autophagy, namely Autophagosome.

His research investigates the connection between mTORC1 and topics such as Nutrient sensing that intersect with problems in Catabolism. The study incorporates disciplines such as Autophagy database and Ageing in addition to Neurodegeneration. His Programmed cell death study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Chaperone-mediated autophagy, Computational biology and Autolysosome.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Cell biology (74.12%)
  • Autophagy (57.65%)
  • mTORC1 (21.18%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Cell biology (74.12%)
  • Autophagy (57.65%)
  • mTORC1 (21.18%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Cell biology, Autophagy, mTORC1, Context and Cell. His Cell biology study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Programmed cell death. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Multicellular organism and Autolysosome.

Viktor I. Korolchuk merges many fields, such as Autophagy and Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, in his writings. His RHEB study in the realm of mTORC1 interacts with subjects such as Perilipin. His Cell research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Developmental biology, Intracellular and Ageing.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) (38 citations)
  • Mitochondrial quality control as a key determinant of cell survival (33 citations)
  • Rapamycin improves healthspan but not inflammaging in nfκb1−/− mice (19 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Genetics
  • Apoptosis
  • Biochemistry

Viktor I. Korolchuk mainly focuses on Cell biology, Autophagy, Mitophagy, Mitochondrion and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. His Cell biology study frequently links to other fields, such as Internalization. He works in the field of Autophagy, focusing on Chaperone-mediated autophagy in particular.

In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Mitophagy, Programmed cell death is strongly linked to Cell fate determination. His Programmed cell death research includes themes of Multicellular organism and Autolysosome. His study looks at the relationship between PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and topics such as Senescence, which overlap with Cell, mTORC1, Developmental biology, Ageing and Cancer research.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Regulation of Mammalian Autophagy in Physiology and Pathophysiology

    Brinda Ravikumar;Sovan Sarkar;Janet E. Davies;Marie Futter

  • Lysosomal positioning coordinates cellular nutrient responses

    Viktor I. Korolchuk;Shinji Saiki;Maike Lichtenberg;Farah H. Siddiqi

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Autophagy Inhibition Compromises Degradation of Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway Substrates

    Viktor I. Korolchuk;Alicia Mansilla;Fiona M. Menzies;David C. Rubinsztein

  • Mitochondria are required for pro‐ageing features of the senescent phenotype

    Clara Correia-Melo;Clara Correia-Melo;Francisco D.M. Marques;Rhys Anderson;Graeme Hewitt

  • Mechanisms of cross-talk between the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy-lysosome systems

    Viktor I. Korolchuk;Fiona M. Menzies;David C. Rubinsztein

  • In search of an "autophagomometer".

    David C. Rubinsztein;Ana Maria Cuervo;Brinda Ravikumar;Sovan Sarkar

  • Postmitotic neurons develop a p21-dependent senescence-like phenotype driven by a DNA damage response.

    Diana Jurk;Chunfang Wang;Satomi Miwa;Mandy Maddick

  • Bst-2/HM1.24 Is a Raft-Associated Apical Membrane Protein with an Unusual Topology

    Sabine Kupzig;Viktor Korolchuk;Ruth Rollason;Anna Sugden

  • Lysosome-mediated processing of chromatin in senescence

    Andre Ivanov;Jeff Pawlikowski;Indrani Manoharan;John van Tuyn

  • Huntington's disease: from pathology and genetics to potential therapies.

    Sara Imarisio;Jenny Carmichael;Viktor Korolchuk;Chien-Wen Chen

  • mTORC1 as the main gateway to autophagy.

    Yoana Rabanal-Ruiz;Elsje G. Otten;Viktor I. Korolchuk

  • Complex Inhibitory Effects of Nitric Oxide on Autophagy

    Sovan Sarkar;Viktor I. Korolchuk;Maurizio Renna;Sara Imarisio

  • Mitochondria in cell senescence: Is mitophagy the weakest link?

    Viktor I. Korolchuk;Satomi Miwa;Bernadette Carroll;Thomas von Zglinicki

  • Impaired autophagy in the lipid storage disorder Niemann–Pick type C1 disease

    Sovan Sarkar;Bernadette Carroll;Yosef Buganim;Dorothea Maetzel

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Autophagy, lipophagy and lysosomal lipid storage disorders

    Carl Ward;Nuria Martinez-Lopez;Elsje G. Otten;Bernadette Carroll

Frequent Co-Authors

Sovan Sarkar
Sovan Sarkar University of Birmingham
David C. Rubinsztein
David C. Rubinsztein University of Cambridge
João F. Passos
João F. Passos Mayo Clinic
Sergio Lavandero
Sergio Lavandero University of Chile
Fiona M. Menzies
Fiona M. Menzies University of Cambridge
Boris Zhivotovsky
Boris Zhivotovsky Karolinska Institute
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
George Banting
George Banting University of Bristol
Patricia Boya
Patricia Boya Spanish National Research Council
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a variety of healthcare pathways. Many students start by looking at foundational programs, such as accelerated radiology tech programs online, which offer a fast track to roles in medical imaging and diagnostics.

Specialized knowledge is essential for a competitive edge in today’s market. Those passionate about nutrition might consider advanced dietetic masters programs to qualify for careers as registered dietitians or nutritionists.

Flexible, accredited training is also available for those entering or advancing in allied health professions. For example, students seeking affordable entry let into healthcare can take advantage of online medical assistant programs that accept financial aid. These options make a healthcare career more accessible.

Additionally, current medical assistants can expand their qualifications and transition to nursing by enrolling in ma to lpn bridge programs online. These bridge programs are designed for working professionals seeking career growth in clinical settings.

Best Scientists Citing Viktor I. Korolchuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles