World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
74
Citations
17987
World Ranking
1356
National Ranking
581

Thomas N. Woods publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas N. Woods sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 471 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Thomas N. Woods D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas N. Woods sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas N. Woods is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Physics and Astronomy, with a strong focus on Astronomy and Astrophysics.

Their work extensively covers topics related to Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics, Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, and Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics. Additional areas of study include Ionosphere and Magnetosphere Dynamics, Calibration and Measurement Techniques, Astro and Planetary Science, and Stellar, Planetary, and Galactic Studies.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Woods include Phillip C. Chamberlin, James Mason, Bennet Schwab, Martin Snow, and A. R. Jones.

Woods has contributed multiple publications to notable venues. These venues include arXiv (Cornell University), Solar Physics, The Astrophysical Journal, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics, and Earth and Space Science.

Selected recent papers by Thomas N. Woods are:

  • The TSIS-1 Hybrid Solar Reference Spectrum, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Initial Observations by the GOLD Mission, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics
  • The Flare Irradiance Spectral Model-Version 2 (FISM2), 2020, Space Weather
  • SI-traceable Spectral Irradiance Radiometric Characterization and Absolute Calibration of the TSIS-1 Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM), 2020, Remote Sensing
  • Version 2 of the TSIS-1 Hybrid Solar Reference Spectrum and Extension to the Full Spectrum, 2023, Earth and Space Science

Best Publications

  • The Mars Atmosphere and Volatile Evolution (MAVEN) Mission

    Bruce M. Jakosky;R. P. Lin;J. M. Grebowsky;J. G. Luhmann

  • Extreme Ultraviolet Variability Experiment (EVE) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO): Overview of Science Objectives, Instrument Design, Data Products, and Model Developments

    T. N. Woods;F. G. Eparvier;R. Hock;A. R. Jones

  • Solar EUV Experiment (SEE): Mission overview and first results

    Thomas N. Woods;Francis G. Eparvier;Scott M. Bailey;Phillip C. Chamberlin

  • The SOLAR2000 empirical solar irradiance model and forecast tool

    W.Kent Tobiska;Tom Woods;Frank Eparvier;Rodney Viereck

  • Improved solar Lyman α irradiance modeling from 1947 through 1999 based on UARS observations

    Thomas N. Woods;W. Kent Tobiska;Gary J. Rottman;John R. Worden

  • Validation of the UARS solar ultraviolet irradiances: Comparison with the ATLAS 1 and 2 measurements

    T. N. Woods;D. K. Prinz;G. J. Rottman;J. London

  • Detection and parameterization of variations in solar mid- and near-ultraviolet radiation (200-400 nm)

    Judith L. Lean;Gary J. Rottman;H. Lee Kyle;Thomas N. Woods

  • Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling

    I. Ermolli;K. Matthes;T. Dudok de Wit;N. A. Krivova

  • Solar‐Stellar Irradiance Comparison Experiment 1: 1. Instrument design and operation

    Gary J. Rottman;Thomas N. Woods;Thomas P. Sparn

  • The October 28, 2003 extreme EUV solar flare and resultant extreme ionospheric effects: Comparison to other Halloween events and the Bastille Day event

    B. T. Tsurutani;B. T. Tsurutani;D. L. Judge;F. L. Guarnieri;F. L. Guarnieri;F. L. Guarnieri;P. Gangopadhyay

  • Solar irradiance variability during the October 2003 solar storm period

    Thomas N. Woods;Francis G. Eparvier;Juan Fontenla;Jerald Harder

  • Trends in solar spectral irradiance variability in the visible and infrared

    Jerald W. Harder;Juan M. Fontenla;Peter Pilewskie;Erik C. Richard

  • Anomalously low solar extreme‐ultraviolet irradiance and thermospheric density during solar minimum

    Stanley C. Solomon;Thomas N. Woods;Leonid V. Didkovsky;John T. Emmert

  • MAVEN observations of the response of Mars to an interplanetary coronal mass ejection

    Bruce M. Jakosky;Joseph M. Grebowsky;Janet G. Luhmann;J. Connerney

  • The Solar Extreme Ultraviolet Monitor for MAVEN

    F. G. Eparvier;P. C. Chamberlin;T. N. Woods;E. M. B. Thiemann

  • Solar Irradiance Reference Spectra (SIRS) for the 2008 Whole Heliosphere Interval (WHI)

    Thomas N. Woods;Phillip C. Chamberlin;Jerald W. Harder;Rachel A. Hock

  • High‐resolution solar spectral irradiance from extreme ultraviolet to far infrared

    J. M. Fontenla;J. Harder;W. Livingston;M. Snow

  • Flare Irradiance Spectral Model (FISM): Flare component algorithms and results

    Phillip C. Chamberlin;Thomas N. Woods;Francis G. Eparvier

  • Flare Irradiance Spectral Model (FISM): Daily component algorithms and results

    Phillip C. Chamberlin;Thomas N. Woods;Francis G. Eparvier

  • NEW SOLAR EXTREME-ULTRAVIOLET IRRADIANCE OBSERVATIONS DURING FLARES

    Thomas N. Woods;Rachel Hock;Frank Eparvier;Andrew R. Jones

  • Measured and modeled trends in solar spectral irradiance variability in the visible and infrared

    Jerald Harder;Juan Fontenla;Mark Rast;Peter Pilewskie

Frequent Co-Authors

Stanley C. Solomon
Stanley C. Solomon National Center for Atmospheric Research
Gary J. Rottman
Gary J. Rottman University of Colorado Boulder
William E. McClintock
William E. McClintock University of Colorado Boulder
Scott M. Bailey
Scott M. Bailey Virginia Tech
Judith Lean
Judith Lean United States Naval Research Laboratory
Peter Pilewskie
Peter Pilewskie University of Colorado Boulder
Hugh S. Hudson
Hugh S. Hudson University of Glasgow
W. K. Peterson
W. K. Peterson University of Colorado Boulder
Paul D. Feldman
Paul D. Feldman Johns Hopkins University
Alan Burns
Alan Burns National Center for Atmospheric Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their knowledge and career opportunities related to Environmental Sciences, several online degrees offer valuable alternatives. Many students consider an affordable online general studies degree to build a broad academic foundation while keeping education costs manageable.

If you’re seeking a less intensive route, exploring the easiest bachelor degree to get might provide a smoother academic path while still supporting entry into fields linked to sustainability and environmental management.

For a more specialized focus, an online geology degree online is an excellent choice. It equips students with expertise in earth processes that are vital for natural resource management and environmental conservation careers.

Additionally, a geographic information systems degree is invaluable for careers involving spatial data analysis and environmental planning. GIS professionals are increasingly essential in tracking and solving environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas N. Woods

Trending Scientists