World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
80
Citations
39922
World Ranking
16890
National Ranking
8470

Thomas Bodenheimer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Bodenheimer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 245 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas Bodenheimer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Bodenheimer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Thomas Bodenheimer is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on health professions and medicine, with an emphasis on the subfields of general health professions, economics and econometrics, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, epidemiology, and public health, environmental, and occupational health.

Their work encompasses key topics including primary care and health outcomes, healthcare policy and management, diabetes management and education, healthcare cost, quality, and practices, chronic disease management strategies, interprofessional education and collaboration, and innovations in medical education.

Recent papers authored by Thomas Bodenheimer include:

  • Revitalizing Primary Care, Part 2: Hopes for the Future (2022) published in The Annals of Family Medicine
  • Revitalizing Primary Care, Part 1: Root Causes of Primary Care's Problems (2022) published in The Annals of Family Medicine
  • Integrating Physical Therapists Into Primary Care Within A Large Health Care System (2021) published in The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

Other notable papers in their research network include:

  • Revitalizing the U.S. Primary Care Infrastructure (2021) published in New England Journal of Medicine
  • Process evaluation of a medical assistant health coaching intervention for type 2 diabetes in diverse primary care settings (2021) published in Translational Behavioral Medicine

Thomas Bodenheimer frequently collaborates with several co-authors in their research publications. These include Taylor L. Clark, Addie L. Fortmann, Athena Philis-Tsimikas, Haley Sandoval, and Linda C. Gallo.

Their research is published in venues such as The Annals of Family Medicine, The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, New England Journal of Medicine, Translational Behavioral Medicine, and Families Systems & Health.

In 2008, Thomas Bodenheimer was recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

Best Publications

  • Patient Self-management of Chronic Disease in Primary Care

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Kate Lorig;Halsted Holman;Kevin Grumbach

  • Improving Primary Care for Patients With Chronic Illness

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Edward H. Wagner;Kevin Grumbach

  • Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Edward H. Wagner;Kevin Grumbach

  • From Triple to Quadruple Aim: Care of the Patient Requires Care of the Provider

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Christine Sinsky

  • Coordinating Care — A Perilous Journey through the Health Care System

    Thomas Bodenheimer

  • Uneasy alliance--clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry.

    Thomas Bodenheimer

  • Can health care teams improve primary care practice

    Kevin Grumbach;Thomas Bodenheimer

  • Primary Care: Current Problems And Proposed Solutions

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Hoangmai H. Pham

  • Confronting The Growing Burden Of Chronic Disease: Can The U.S. Health Care Workforce Do The Job?

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Ellen Chen;Heather D. Bennett

  • External Incentives, Information Technology, and Organized Processes to Improve Health Care Quality for Patients With Chronic Diseases

    Lawrence Casalino;Robin R. Gillies;Stephen M. Shortell;Julie A. Schmittdiel

  • The 10 Building Blocks of High-Performing Primary Care

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Amireh Ghorob;Rachel Willard-Grace;Kevin Grumbach

  • Primary care--will it survive?

    Thomas Bodenheimer

  • In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices

    Christine A. Sinsky;Rachel Willard-Grace;Andrew M. Schutzbank;Thomas A. Sinsky

  • THE ULTRASTRUCTURE OF MAUTHNER CELL SYNAPSES AND NODES IN GOLDFISH BRAINS.

    J. David Robertson;Thomas S. Bodenheimer;David E. Stage

  • High and rising health care costs. Part 2: technologic innovation.

    Thomas Bodenheimer

  • The American health care system--the movement for improved quality in health care.

    Thomas Bodenheimer

  • High and Rising Health Care Costs. Part 1: Seeking an Explanation

    Thomas Bodenheimer

  • A Primary Care Home for Americans: Putting the House in Order

    Kevin Grumbach;Thomas Bodenheimer

  • Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: An exploration and status report

    Thomas Bodenheimer;Margaret A. Handley

  • Primary care: proposed solutions to the physician shortage without training more physicians.

    Thomas S. Bodenheimer;Mark D. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin Grumbach
Kevin Grumbach University of California, San Francisco
Stephen M. Shortell
Stephen M. Shortell University of California, Berkeley
Thomas G. Rundall
Thomas G. Rundall University of California, Berkeley
Steffie Woolhandler
Steffie Woolhandler City University of New York
David U. Himmelstein
David U. Himmelstein City University of New York
Barbara Starfield
Barbara Starfield Johns Hopkins University
Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef
Hubertus J. M. Vrijhoef Maastricht University
Edward H. Wagner
Edward H. Wagner Kaiser Permanente
James C. Robinson
James C. Robinson University of California, Berkeley
Ellen Nolte
Ellen Nolte London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a career in medicine or healthcare, there are a variety of online degree options to accelerate your journey and expand your career opportunities. Many professionals are turning to dnp online programs for a flexible route toward advanced nursing roles such as nurse practitioner, clinical leader, or educator. These programs can offer a balance between rigorous academics and convenience for working nurses.

Some students seek dnp programs without dissertation, streamlining the path to a doctoral degree without the added pressure of completing original research. For those looking to enter the workforce more rapidly, a 9 month lpn program can provide the skills and certification needed for entry-level nursing positions in less than a year.

If your interests lie in mental health, consider accelerated msn psychiatric np programs. These allow registered nurses to specialize quickly and meet the growing demand for mental health professionals. With online learning, you can tailor your education to fit your career goals and personal schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Bodenheimer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles