World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
63
Citations
12950
World Ranking
10308
National Ranking
268

Theo M. Luider publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo M. Luider sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 334 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Theo M. Luider D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Theo M. Luider sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Theo M. Luider is affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions to several specialized subfields including Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Hematology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Oncology.

Their work focuses on multiple topics, prominently:

  • Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications

Theo M. Luider has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication sites include:

  • HemaSphere (5 publications)
  • Scientific Reports (4 publications)
  • Journal of Proteome Research (4 publications)
  • Expert Review of Proteomics (3 publications)
  • Clinical Chemistry (3 publications)

Selected recent papers from their publications demonstrate the breadth of their scientific inquiry:

  • "Analytical techniques for multiplex analysis of protein biomarkers," 2020, Expert Review of Proteomics
  • "Human extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocyte organoids show region-specific differentiation potential and model cystic fibrosis-related bile duct disease," 2020, Scientific Reports
  • "Mass Spectrometry for Identification, Monitoring, and Minimal Residual Disease Detection of M-Proteins," 2020, Clinical Chemistry
  • "Molecular markers for cervical cancer screening," 2021, Expert Review of Proteomics
  • "Autologous dendritic cells pulsed with allogeneic tumour cell lysate induce tumour-reactive T-cell responses in patients with pancreatic cancer: A phase I study," 2022, European Journal of Cancer

Their collaborative network includes frequent co-authors with whom they have contributed to multiple publications, such as:

  • Martijn M. VanDuijn (21 co-authored works)
  • Christoph Stingl (17 co-authored works)
  • Lennard J. M. Dekker (17 co-authored works)
  • Joannes F.M. Jacobs (16 co-authored works)
  • Somayya Noori (12 co-authored works)

Best Publications

  • Dynamic assembly of end-joining complexes requires interaction between Ku70/80 and XRCC4

    Pierre-Olivier Mari;Bogdan I. Florea;Stephan P. Persengiev;Nicole S. Verkaik

  • Proteomic Analysis of Exosomes Isolated from Human Malignant Pleural Effusions

    Martin P. Bard;Joost P. Hegmans;Annabrita Hemmes;Theo M. Luider

  • Proteomic Analysis of Exosomes Secreted by Human Mesothelioma Cells

    Joost P.J.J. Hegmans;Martin P.L. Bard;Annabrita Hemmes;Theo M. Luider

  • Recommendations for Biomarker Identification and Qualification in Clinical Proteomics

    Harald Mischak;Guenter Allmaier;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa Attwood

  • Exosomes as biomarker treasure chests for prostate cancer.

    Diederick Duijvesz;Theo Luider;Chris H. Bangma;Guido Jenster

  • Sample preparation issues for tissue imaging by imaging MS.

    Başak Kükrer Kaletaş;Ingrid M. van der Wiel;Jonathan Stauber;Lennard J. Dekker

  • Proteomic profiling of exosomes leads to the identification of novel biomarkers for prostate cancer.

    Diederick Duijvesz;Kristin E. Burnum-Johnson;Marina A. Gritsenko;A. Marije Hoogland

  • Glioblastoma-derived extracellular vesicles modify the phenotype of monocytic cells

    Jeroen de Vrij;S L Niek Maas;Kitty M C Kwappenberg;Rosalie Schnoor

  • Differential expression and prognostic significance of SOX genes in pediatric medulloblastoma and ependymoma identified by microarray analysis.

    Judith M. de Bont;Johan M. Kros;Monique M.C.J. Passier;Roel E. Reddingius

  • Biomedical application of MALDI mass spectrometry for small-molecule analysis

    Jeroen J.A. van Kampen;Peter C. Burgers;Ronald de Groot;Rob A. Gruters

  • Quantitative Proteomics and Metabolomics Analysis of Normal Human Cerebrospinal Fluid Samples

    Marcel P. Stoop;Leon Coulier;Therese Rosenling;Shanna Shi

  • Methodological advances in the discovery of protein and peptide disease markers.

    Rainer Bischoff;Theo M. Luider

  • Establishment and characterization of primary and metastatic uveal melanoma cell lines

    Gregorius P. M. Luyten;Nicole C. Naus;Cornelia M. Mooy;Anne Hagemeijer

  • METABOLOMICS OF CEREBROSPINAL FLUID REVEALS CHANGES IN THE CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM METABOLISM IN A RAT MODEL OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

    Marek J. Noga;Adrie Dane;Shanna Shi;Amos Attali

  • Gene expression profiles associated with treatment response in oligodendrogliomas

    Pim J French;Sigrid M A Swagemakers;Jord H A Nagel;Mathilde C M Kouwenhoven

  • Exosomal Secretion of Cytoplasmic Prostate Cancer Xenograft-derived Proteins

    Flip H. Jansen;Jeroen Krijgsveld;Angelique van Rijswijk;Gert-Jan van den Bemd

  • Identification of tumor-related proteins by proteomic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid from patients with primary brain tumors.

    Ping-Pin Zheng;Theo M. Luider;Rob Pieters;Cees J.J. Avezaat

  • Circulating glioma biomarkers

    Johan M. Kros;Dana M. Mustafa;Lennard J.M. Dekker;Peter A.E. Sillevis Smitt

  • Identification of a Putative Protein Profile Associated with Tamoxifen Therapy Resistance in Breast Cancer

    Arzu Umar;Hyuk Kang;Annemieke M. Timmermans;Maxime P. Look

  • The Effect of Preanalytical Factors on Stability of the Proteome and Selected Metabolites in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)

    Therese Rosenling;Christiaan L. Slim;Christin Christin;Leon Coulier

Frequent Co-Authors

Johan M. Kros
Johan M. Kros Erasmus University Rotterdam
Guido Jenster
Guido Jenster Erasmus University Rotterdam
Rainer Bischoff
Rainer Bischoff University of Groningen
John A. Foekens
John A. Foekens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus
Albert D. M. E. Osterhaus University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation
John W.M. Martens
John W.M. Martens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Marcel Smid
Marcel Smid Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić
Ljiljana Paša-Tolić Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory
Eric A.P. Steegers
Eric A.P. Steegers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Chris H. Bangma
Chris H. Bangma Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens up a variety of career pathways, many of which can be pursued online for greater flexibility. Students interested in allied health fields might consider exploring the best online radiology tech programs, which can lead to roles in diagnostic imaging and patient care.

For those passionate about nutrition and wellness, accredited options such as the best dietitian programs can help graduates become registered dietitians and nutritionists.

Entry-level positions like medical assisting remain in high demand, and today’s students can conveniently enroll in an online medical assisting school with access to financial aid and accelerated study options.

For career advancement, some choose bridge programs like the medical assistant to lpn route, taking online courses to transition into roles with higher responsibility and earning potential.

These pathways illustrate how a strong foundation in biology and biochemistry can lead to diverse, rewarding careers across the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Theo M. Luider

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles