World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
14625
World Ranking
14239
National Ranking
347

Marcel Smid publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Smid sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 308 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Marcel Smid D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Smid sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Landscape of somatic mutations in 560 breast cancer whole-genome sequences

    Serena Nik-Zainal;Serena Nik-Zainal;Helen Davies;Johan Staaf;Manasa Ramakrishna

  • Subtypes of Breast Cancer Show Preferential Site of Relapse

    Marcel Smid;Yixin Wang;Yi Zhang;Anieta M. Sieuwerts

  • Patterns of somatic structural variation in human cancer genomes

    Yilong Li;Nicola D Roberts;Jeremiah A Wala;Jeremiah A Wala;Ofer Shapira;Ofer Shapira

  • Latent bone metastasis in breast cancer tied to Src-dependent survival signals.

    Xiang H.-F. Zhang;Qiongqing Wang;William Gerald;Clifford A. Hudis

  • Four miRNAs associated with aggressiveness of lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive human breast cancer

    John A. Foekens;Anieta M. Sieuwerts;Marcel Smid;Maxime P. Look

  • Selection of Bone Metastasis Seeds by Mesenchymal Signals in the Primary Tumor Stroma

    Xiang H.-F. Zhang;Xin Jin;Srinivas Malladi;Yilong Zou

  • Genes Associated With Breast Cancer Metastatic to Bone

    Marcel Smid;Yixin Wang;Jan G.M. Klijn;Anieta M. Sieuwerts

  • Ovarian cancer cell line panel (OCCP): Clinical importance of in vitro morphological subtypes

    Corine M. Beaufort;Jean C. A. Helmijr;Anna M. Piskorz;Marlous Hoogstraat

  • Distinct gene mutation profiles among luminal-type and basal-type breast cancer cell lines

    Antoinette Hollestelle;Jord H. A. Nagel;Marcel Smid;Suzanne Lam

  • The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer highlights changes in mutation and signature frequencies.

    Lindsay Angus;Marcel Smid;Saskia M Wilting;Job van Riet

  • SDHB/SDHA immunohistochemistry in pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas: a multicenter interobserver variation analysis using virtual microscopy: a Multinational Study of the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors (ENS@T).

    Thomas G. Papathomas;Lindsey Oudijk;Alexandre Persu;Anthony J. Gill

  • miRNA expression profiling of 51 human breast cancer cell lines reveals subtype and driver mutation-specific miRNAs.

    Muhammad Riaz;Marijn T M van Jaarsveld;Antoinette Hollestelle;Wendy J C Prager-van der Smissen

  • mRNA and microRNA Expression Profiles in Circulating Tumor Cells and Primary Tumors of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients

    Anieta M. Sieuwerts;Bianca Mostert;Joan Bolt-de Vries;Dieter Peeters

  • Validation of a Radiosensitivity Molecular Signature in Breast Cancer

    Steven A. Eschrich;William J. Fulp;Yudi Pawitan;John A. Foekens

  • Pathway analysis of gene signatures predicting metastasis of node-negative primary breast cancer

    Jack X Yu;Anieta M Sieuwerts;Yi Zhang;John W M Martens

  • MicroRNA-30c expression level is an independent predictor of clinical benefit of endocrine therapy in advanced estrogen receptor positive breast cancer

    F. Germán Rodríguez-González;F. Germán Rodríguez-González;Anieta M. Sieuwerts;Marcel Smid;Maxime P. Look

  • Transcriptome analysis reveals cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers as a major source of UV-induced DNA breaks

    George A Garinis;James R Mitchell;Michael J Moorhouse;Katsuhiro Hanada

  • Breast cancer genomics and immuno-oncological markers to guide immune therapies.

    Dora Hammerl;Marcel Smid;Annemieke Timmermans;Stefan Sleijfer

  • Abstract 678: Validation of a radiosensitivity molecular signature in breast cancer

    Javier F. Torres-Roca;William J. Fulp;Yudi Pawitan;John Foekens

Frequent Co-Authors

John W.M. Martens
John W.M. Martens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Anieta M. Sieuwerts
Anieta M. Sieuwerts Erasmus University Rotterdam
John A. Foekens
John A. Foekens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Stefan Sleijfer
Stefan Sleijfer Erasmus University Rotterdam
Serena Nik-Zainal
Serena Nik-Zainal University of Cambridge
Luc Dirix
Luc Dirix GZA Ziekenhuizen Campus Sint-Augustinus
Jan N. M. IJzermans
Jan N. M. IJzermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Bob van de Water
Bob van de Water Leiden University
Fred C.G.J. Sweep
Fred C.G.J. Sweep Radboud University
Anne Lise Børresen-Dale
Anne Lise Børresen-Dale Oslo University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways across health, science, and research disciplines. For those interested in nutrition, there are top dietetics programs in the US that prepare graduates for careers as registered dietitians or nutrition experts.

Many students seek practical, in-demand health roles, such as medical assisting. Earning a certification from accredited medical assistant classes online with financial aid can make this career more accessible and affordable. If you are a certified medical assistant looking to advance, a ma to lpn bridge program online enables you to qualify for positions as a Licensed Practical Nurse.

For those seeking a more research-oriented or academic path, an online biology degree offers flexibility and a fast track to graduation. Whether your goal is clinical work, laboratory research, nutrition, or direct patient care, these online pathways offer tailored options to help you progress in your Biology or Biochemistry career.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel Smid

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles