World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
17247
World Ranking
2295
National Ranking
924

Stephen D. Prince publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Prince sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stephen D. Prince D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Prince sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen D. Prince is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a focus on several specialized subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Soil Science, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics, and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics.

Stephen D. Prince has published research in various academic journals, frequently contributing to the following venues:

  • Remote Sensing
  • Nature Sustainability
  • Journal of Land Use Science
  • Ecosphere

Recent publications by the scientist include:

  • Land Use and Degradation in a Desert Margin: The Northern Negev, 2021, Remote Sensing
  • Unplanned Natural Experiments: The Case of Remote Sensing of Primary Production and Its Environmental Correlations in the Negev, 2020, Remote Sensing
  • How to halt the global decline of lands, 2020, Nature Sustainability
  • Land-use conversions from managed grasslands to croplands in Uruguay increase medium-term net carbon emissions to the atmosphere, 2021, Journal of Land Use Science
  • Impact of fire and harvest on forest ecosystem services in a species-rich area in the southern Appalachians, 2020, Ecosphere

The scientist has collaborated with a number of co-authors across their publications. Frequent collaborators include Louise Willemen, Nichole N. Barger, Ben ten Brink, Matthew Cantele, and Barend Erasmus.

Best Publications

  • Global Primary Production: A Remote Sensing Approach

    Stephen D. Prince;Samuel N. Goward

  • Greenness in semi-arid areas across the globe 1981–2007 — an Earth Observing Satellite based analysis of trends and drivers

    Rasmus Fensholt;Tobias Langanke;Kjeld Rasmussen;Anette Reenberg

  • Estimation of tropical forest structural characteristics using large-footprint lidar

    Jason B. Drake;Ralph O. Dubayah;David B. Clark;Robert G. Knox

  • Can human-induced land degradation be distinguished from the effects of rainfall variability? A case study in South Africa

    K.J. Wessels;S.D. Prince;J. Malherbe;J. Small

  • A model of regional primary production for use with coarse resolution satellite data

    S. D. Prince

  • Satellite remote sensing of primary production: comparison of results for Sahelian grasslands 1981-1988

    S. D. Prince

  • Evidence from rain-use efficiencies does not indicate extensive Sahelian desertification

    S. D. Prince;E. Brown De Colstoun;L. L. Kravitz

  • GLOBAL POTENTIAL NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION PREDICTED FROM VEGETATION CLASS, PRECIPITATION, AND TEMPERATURE

    Stephen Del Grosso;Stephen Del Grosso;William Parton;Thomas Stohlgren;Daolan Zheng

  • Assessing the effects of human-induced land degradation in the former homelands of northern South Africa with a 1 km AVHRR NDVI time-series

    Konrad J Wessels;SD Prince;PE Frost;D Van Zyl

  • Spectral estimates of absorbed radiation and phytomass production in corn and soybean canopies

    C.S.T. Daughtry;K.P. Gallo;S.N. Goward;S.D. Prince

  • HAPEX-Sahel: A large-scale study of land-atmosphere interactions in the semi-arid tropics

    J.P. Goutorbe;Thierry Lebel;A. Tinga;P. Bessemoulin

  • NET PRIMARY PRODUCTION OF U.S. MIDWEST CROPLANDS FROM AGRICULTURAL HARVEST YIELD DATA

    Stephen D. Prince;Jonathan Haskett;Marc Steininger;Holly Strand

  • Satellite remote sensing of primary production : an improved production efficiency modeling approach

    Scott J. Goetz;Stephen D. Prince;Samuel N. Goward;Michelle M. Thawley

  • Mean and inter-year variation of growing-season normalized difference vegetation index for the Sahel 1981-1989

    C. J. Tucker;W. W. Newcomb;S. O. Los;S. D. Prince

  • Monitoring the grasslands of the Sahel 1984-1985

    C. J. Tucker;C. O. Justice;S. D. Prince

  • Response of terrestrial carbon uptake to climate interannual variability in China

    Mingkui Cao;Stephen D. Prince;Kerang Li;Bo Tao

  • Generating a long-term land data record from the AVHRR and MODIS Instruments

    J. Pedelty;S. Devadiga;E. Masuoka;M. Brown

  • Role of land surface processes in monsoon development: East Asia and West Africa

    Yongkang Xue;H.-M. H. Juang;W.-P. Li;S. Prince

  • Satellite remote sensing of rangelands in Botswana II. NOAA AVHRR and herbaceous vegetation

    S. D. Prince;C. J. Tucker

  • Remotely Sensed Interannual Variations and Trends in Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity 1981-2000

    Mingkui Cao;Stephen D. Prince;Jennifer Small;Scott J. Goetz

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott J. Goetz
Scott J. Goetz Northern Arizona University
Konrad J Wessels
Konrad J Wessels George Mason University
Compton J. Tucker
Compton J. Tucker Goddard Space Flight Center
Samuel N. Goward
Samuel N. Goward University of Maryland, College Park
Agnès Bégué
Agnès Bégué University of Montpellier
Yongkang Xue
Yongkang Xue University of California, Los Angeles
Christopher O. Justice
Christopher O. Justice University of Maryland, College Park
Molly E. Brown
Molly E. Brown University of Maryland, College Park
Eric Vermote
Eric Vermote Goddard Space Flight Center
Pavel Kabat
Pavel Kabat Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career pathways. For those interested in broadening their academic foundation, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap offers flexibility and affordability, allowing students to tailor their education while saving on costs.

For students aiming to advance their professional credentials, especially in social welfare aspects related to environmental issues, affordable dsw programs provide a path to leadership roles and impactful careers.

If you're considering a smoother entry into the field with manageable coursework, looking into the easiest bachelors degree paths can help you identify programs that align with your strengths and interests without compromising quality education.

Additionally, specializing in the earth sciences through a geology online degree complements environmental studies by providing critical knowledge of the planet’s physical processes, preparing graduates for diverse roles in research, conservation, and resource management.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen D. Prince

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles