World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
44
Citations
10830
World Ranking
1558
National Ranking
92

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
45
Citations
11948
World Ranking
1499
National Ranking
49

Stefan Turek publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Turek sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 245 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Stefan Turek D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Turek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Turek is affiliated with TU Dortmund University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Engineering, with a particular emphasis on Computational Mechanics. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Numerical Analysis, and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes.

The primary topics of Stefan Turek's work focus on advanced computational techniques and numerical methods. These include:

  • Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics
  • Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
  • Numerical methods for differential equations
  • Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
  • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
  • Matrix Theory and Algorithms

The scientist's frequent co-authors have included Charbel Farhat, Cedric Taylor, Nigel Weatherill, Philip Gresho, and David Gartling, each collaborating on numerous projects. Stefan Turek's work has been published repeatedly in prominent venues. The most frequent publication outlets are:

  • International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids (24 publications)
  • PAMM (6 publications)
  • Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics (3 publications)
  • AIP conference proceedings (3 publications)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (3 publications)

Examples of recent papers authored or co-authored by Stefan Turek illustrate their research interests with specific applications and numerical methods:

  • "Arduino-based slider setup for gas-liquid mass transfer investigations: Experiments and CFD simulations," 2020, AIChE Journal
  • "Increased space-parallelism via time-simultaneous Newton-multigrid methods for nonstationary nonlinear PDE problems," 2021, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • "Very fast finite element Poisson solvers on lower precision accelerator hardware: A proof of concept study for Nvidia Tesla V100," 2022, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • "Modeling and validation of a FEM chip formation simulation to expand the numerical work on discontinuous drilling of Inconel 718," 2023, Procedia CIRP
  • "Fourier analysis of a time-simultaneous two-grid algorithm using a damped Jacobi waveform relaxation smoother for the one-dimensional heat equation," 2022, Journal of Numerical Mathematics

The scope of Stefan Turek's research reflects a consistent focus on improving computational efficiency, accuracy, and applicability of numerical methods across engineering disciplines, particularly within fluid dynamics and related computational simulations.

Best Publications

  • Benchmark Computations of Laminar Flow Around a Cylinder

    M. Schäfer;S. Turek;F. Durst;E. Krause

  • Simple nonconforming quadrilateral Stokes element

    R. Rannacher;S. Turek

  • ARTIFICIAL BOUNDARIES AND FLUX AND PRESSURE CONDITIONS FOR THE INCOMPRESSIBLE NAVIER–STOKES EQUATIONS

    J. G. Heywood;R. Rannacher;S. Turek

  • Proposal for Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction between an Elastic Object and Laminar Incompressible Flow

    Stefan Turek;Jaroslav Hron

  • Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics

    S Hysing;S Turek;D Kuzmin;N Parolini

  • Efficient Solvers for Incompressible Flow Problems: An Algorithmic and Computational Approach

    Stefan Turek

  • Swimming by reciprocal motion at low Reynolds number.

    Tian Qiu;Tung Chun Lee;Andrew G. Mark;Konstantin I. Morozov

  • Efficient Solvers for Incompressible Flow Problems

    Stefan Turek

  • A Monolithic FEM/Multigrid Solver for an ALE Formulation of Fluid-Structure Interaction with Applications in Biomechanics

    Jaroslav Hron;Stefan Turek

  • Benchmark computations based on Lattice-Boltzmann, Finite Element and Finite Volume Methods for laminar Flows

    Sebastian Geller;Manfred Krafczyk;Jonas Tölke;Stefan Turek

  • Flux-corrected transport : principles, algorithms, and applications

    D. Kuzʹmin;Rainald Löhner;Stefan Turek

  • Flux correction tools for finite elements

    D. Kuzmin;S. Turek

  • Direct numerical simulation of particulate flow via multigrid FEM techniques and the fictitious boundary method

    Decheng Wan;Stefan Turek

  • a Comparative Study of Time-Stepping Techniques for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations: from Fully Implicit Non-Linear Schemes to Semi-Implicit Projection Methods

    Stefan Turek

  • On the implementation of the κ-ε turbulence model in incompressible flow solvers based on a finite element discretisation

    D. Kuzmin;O. Mierka;S. Turek

  • High-resolution FEM-TVD schemes based on a fully multidimensional flux limiter

    D. Kuzmin;S. Turek

  • CFD modelling of mass transfer with and without chemical reaction in the liquid–liquid slug flow microreactor

    M.N. Kashid;D.W. Agar;S. Turek

  • Using GPUs to improve multigrid solver performance on a cluster

    Dominik Goddeke;Robert Strzodka;Jamaludin Mohd-Yusof;Patrick McCormick

  • Accelerating Double Precision FEM Simulations with GPUs

    Dominik Goddeke;Robert Strzodka;Stefan Turek

  • Numerical Benchmarking of Fluid-Structure Interaction: A Comparison of Different Discretization and Solution Approaches

    S. Turek;J. Hron;M. Razzaq;H. Wobker

  • High-resolution FEM?FCT schemes for multidimensional conservation laws

    D. Kuzmin;M. Möller;S. Turek

Frequent Co-Authors

Rolf Rannacher
Rolf Rannacher Heidelberg University
Mario Ohlberger
Mario Ohlberger University of Münster
Maxim A. Olshanskii
Maxim A. Olshanskii University of Houston
Christian Becker
Christian Becker University of Cologne
Bernd Markert
Bernd Markert RWTH Aachen University
Giovanni P. Galdi
Giovanni P. Galdi University of Pittsburgh
Manfred Krafczyk
Manfred Krafczyk Technische Universität Braunschweig
Rainald Löhner
Rainald Löhner George Mason University
Norbert Kockmann
Norbert Kockmann TU Dortmund University
Michael Hinze
Michael Hinze University of Koblenz and Landau

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Fields like speech pathology often share interdisciplinary skills in problem-solving and critical thinking, making cross-disciplinary education a viable option.

If you’re considering alternative or complementary career routes, understanding the cost is crucial. Programs such as those outlined in speech pathology degree cost online give a clear overview of tuition fees and financial considerations, helping you plan your education investment wisely.

Veterans seeking to transition into new fields can benefit from specialized programs. The veteran friendly online speech pathology degree options offer tailored support, making advanced education accessible and manageable for those with military backgrounds.

For students eager to expedite their education, accelerated options provide a great opportunity. The 5 year accelerated speech pathology programs demonstrate how focused, fast-paced study plans can lead to quicker career entry.

Finally, when looking at program accessibility, understanding which schools are easier to get accepted into can make all the difference. Check out the easiest slp programs to get into for insights on entry requirements and acceptance rates.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Turek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles