World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
5153
World Ranking
8916
National Ranking
132

Stefan Fronzek publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Fronzek sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Stefan Fronzek D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Fronzek sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Fronzek is affiliated with the Finnish Environment Institute in Finland. Their research primarily addresses environmental and agricultural challenges related to climate change, with a significant emphasis on understanding and modeling climate change impacts on agriculture and associated socioeconomic dimensions.

Their scholarly work has been published in various scientific venues. Notable publication outlets include the SSRN Electronic Journal, Climate Risk Management, Regional Environmental Change, Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive, and the Open Data Journal for Agricultural Research.

Their main fields of study are Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Subfields cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Atmospheric Science, and Sociology and Political Science.

Fronzek's research topics are mainly centered on:

  • Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Climate variability and models
  • Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Greenhouse Technology and Climate Control
  • Climate Change Policy and Economics

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Fronzek include:

  • "A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change" (2021, Global Environmental Change)
  • "Future area expansion outweighs increasing drought risk for soybean in Europe" (2022, Global Change Biology)
  • "Lessons from COVID-19 for managing transboundary climate risks and building resilience" (2022, Climate Risk Management)
  • "Shared socioeconomic pathways for climate change research in Finland: co-developing extended SSP narratives for agriculture" (2021, Regional Environmental Change)
  • "FINSKEN: a framework for developing consistent global change scenarios for Finland in the 21st century" (2024, Boreal Environment Research Journal Archive)

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Timothy R. Carter
  • Nina Pirttioja
  • Frank Ewert
  • Mikael Hildén
  • Christopher Reyer

Best Publications

  • Projecting the future distribution of European potential natural vegetation zones with a generalized, tree species-based dynamic vegetation model

    Thomas Hickler;Katrin Vohland;Jane Feehan;Paul A. Miller

  • Uncertainties in projected impacts of climate change on European agriculture and terrestrial ecosystems based on scenarios from regional climate models

    J. E. Olesen;T. R. Carter;C. H. Díaz-Ambrona;S. Fronzek

  • Diverging importance of drought stress for maize and winter wheat in Europe

    Heidi Webber;Frank Ewert;Jørgen E. Olesen;Christoph Müller

  • Leaf litter decomposition-Estimates of global variability based on Yasso07 model

    Mikko Tuomi;Mikko Tuomi;T. Thum;H. Järvinen;S. Fronzek

  • Implication of crop model calibration strategies for assessing regional impacts of climate change in Europe

    Carlos Angulo;Reimund Rötter;Reiner Lock;Andreas Enders

  • Changes in frost, snow and Baltic sea ice by the end of the twenty-first century based on climate model projections for Europe

    Kirsti Jylhä;Stefan Fronzek;Heikki Tuomenvirta;Timothy R. Carter

  • Temperature and Precipitation Effects on Wheat Yield Across a European Transect: a Crop Model Ensemble Analysis Using Impact Response Surfaces

    N. Pirttioja;T. R. Carter;S. Fronzek;M. Bindi

  • What would happen to barley production in Finland if global warming exceeded 4 °C? A model-based assessment

    Reimund P. Rötter;Taru Palosuo;N. K. Pirttioja;M. Dubrovsky;M. Dubrovsky

  • A conceptual framework for cross-border impacts of climate change

    Timothy Carter;Magnus Benzie;Magnus Benzie;Emanuele Campiglio;Henrik Carlsen

  • Assessing the vulnerability of European butterflies to climate change using multiple criteria.

    Risto K. Heikkinen;Miska Luoto;Niko Leikola;Juha Pöyry

  • Future area expansion outweighs increasing drought risk for soybean in Europe

    Unknown

  • Adaptation response surfaces for managing wheat under perturbed climate and CO2 in a Mediterranean environment

    M. Ruiz-Ramos;R. Ferrise;A. Rodríguez;I. J. Lorite

  • Potential effect of climate change on the distribution of palsa mires in subarctic Fennoscandia

    Stefan Fronzek;Miska Luoto;Timothy R. Carter

  • How can irrigated agriculture adapt to climate change? Insights from the Guadiana Basin in Spain

    Consuelo Varela-Ortega;Irene Blanco-Gutiérrez;Paloma Esteve;Sukaina Bharwani

  • Scenarios for investigating risks to biodiversity

    Joachim H. Spangenberg;Alberte Bondeau;Timothy R. Carter;Stefan Fronzek

  • Characterising vulnerability of the elderly to climate change in the Nordic region

    Timothy R. Carter;Stefan Fronzek;Aino Inkinen;Ismo Lahtinen

  • Applying probabilistic projections of climate change with impact models: a case study for sub-arctic palsa mires in Fennoscandia

    Stefan Fronzek;Timothy R. Carter;Jouni Räisänen;Leena Ruokolainen

  • Modelling shifts in agroclimate and crop cultivar response under climate change.

    Reimund P. Rötter;Jukka Höhn;Mirek Trnka;Mirek Trnka;Stefan Fronzek

  • Spatial Modelling of Palsa Mires in Relation to Climate in Northern Europe

    Miska Luoto;Miska Luoto;Stefan Fronzek;Frieda S. Zuidhoff

  • Assessing uncertainties in climate change impacts on resource potential for Europe based on projections from RCMs and GCMs

    Stefan Fronzek;Timothy R. Carter

  • FINADAPT scenarios for the 21st century. Alternative futures for considering adaptation to climate change in Finland. FINADAPT Working Paper 2

    Timothy R. Carter;Kirsti Jylhä;Adriaan Perrels;Stefan Fronzek

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy R. Carter
Timothy R. Carter Finnish Environment Institute
Reimund P. Rötter
Reimund P. Rötter University of Göttingen
Marco Bindi
Marco Bindi University of Florence
Roberto Ferrise
Roberto Ferrise University of Florence
Frank Ewert
Frank Ewert University of Bonn
Miroslav Trnka
Miroslav Trnka Czech Academy of Sciences
Taru Palosuo
Taru Palosuo Natural Resources Institute Finland
Thomas Gaiser
Thomas Gaiser University of Bonn
Mikhail A. Semenov
Mikhail A. Semenov Rothamsted Research
Ignacio J. Lorite
Ignacio J. Lorite Regional Government of Andalusia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in broadening their academic foundation, pursuing an accredited affordable online general studies degree can be a flexible and cost-effective option. This pathway provides a well-rounded education that supports various environmental science roles, especially for those looking to complement their specialized knowledge.

For those seeking a less intensive academic route, exploring the easiest degree to get might be appealing. While these programs vary by institution, finding an accessible degree can help students maintain momentum and build the skills needed for entry-level positions in environmental fields.

Specialized knowledge in Earth’s processes is crucial for many environmental careers. Highly rated online geology programs offer in-depth coursework that prepares students for careers in resource management, environmental consulting, and research.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are a vital tool in environmental analysis and planning. The best GIS programs equip students with skills to collect, analyze, and visualize spatial data, opening career opportunities in urban planning, conservation, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Fronzek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles