World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Scott J. Edgett

Scott J. Edgett

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
36
Citations
11911
World Ranking
2023
National Ranking
87

Scott J. Edgett publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott J. Edgett sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 56 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Scott J. Edgett D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott J. Edgett sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott J. Edgett is affiliated with Stage-Gate International in Canada, where their work contributes to the field of innovation and product development processes. Their professional profile highlights involvement with an organization known for advancing methodologies in managing new product development stages.

Although there is no specific list of publications, frequent co-authors, or detailed information on the precise fields of study and subfields, the association with Stage-Gate International suggests expertise related to innovation management, product development, and stage-gate processes widely used in project and portfolio management disciplines.

The absence of documented recent papers indicates either a focus on applied work or consulting activities rather than active scholarly publishing at this time. Similarly, no particular publication venues or awards are listed, which might reflect a career focused more on industry impact and practical implementation of research insights.

Their profile does not identify specific academic topics but, based on affiliations, the main themes can be inferred as aspects of innovation management frameworks, product development lifecycle optimization, and strategic project evaluation.

Best Publications

  • Portfolio Management For New Products

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • New Product Portfolio Management: Practices and Performance

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Optimizing the Stage-Gate Process: What Best-Practice Companies Do—I

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Portfolio management for new product development: results of an industry practices study

    Robert Cooper;Scott Edgett;Elko Kleinschmidt

  • New Product Portfolio Management : Practices and Performance

    Unknown

  • Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—II

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • New Problems, New Solutions: Making Portfolio Management More Effective

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Portfolio Management in New Product Development: Lessons from the Leaders-I

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—II

    Unknown

  • What distinguishes the top performing new products in financial services

    Robert G. Cooper;Christopher J. Easingwood;Scott Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • MAXIMIZING PRODUCTIVITY IN PRODUCT INNOVATION

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett

  • Best Practices for Managing R&D Portfolios

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Marketing for Service Industries-A Revie

    Scott Edgett;Stephen Parkinson

  • Benchmarking Best NPD Practices-II: Strategy, Resource Allocation and Portfolio Management Are the Focus of This Second in a Three-Part Series

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Benchmarking Best NPD Practices-III: Driving New-Product Projects to Market Success Is the Focus of This Third in a Three-Part Series

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;Elko J. Kleinschmidt

  • Portfolio Management - Fundamental to New Product Success

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett;E. J. Kleinschmidt

  • Product Development For The Service Sector: Lessons From Market Leaders

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J Edgett

  • Overcoming the Crunch in Resources for New Product Development

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett

  • Benchmarking Best NPD Practices—III

    Unknown

  • Developing a product innovation and technology strategy for your business

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett

  • Japanese and British Companies Compared: Contributing Factors to Success and Failure in NPD

    Scott Edgett;David Shipley;Giles Forbes

  • Best Practices in the Idea-to-Launch Process and Its Governance

    Robert G. Cooper;Scott J. Edgett

  • Ideation for Product Innovation: What are the best methods?

    Robert Cooper;Scott Edgett

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert G. Cooper
Robert G. Cooper McMaster University
Elko J. Kleinschmidt
Elko J. Kleinschmidt McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens new doors for students interested in Business and Management. Many universities now offer affordable masters degrees in business fields, letting you gain valuable skills with greater flexibility and lower costs compared to traditional programs.

For those interested in data-driven roles, online masters in data science programs can provide a competitive edge for jobs in analytics, operations, and strategic planning. Data science expertise is increasingly valuable for today’s business leaders.

If your ambition is executive leadership or academia, consider earning a doctorate organizational leadership online. This advanced degree enhances your ability to drive organizational change, lead large teams, and shape business strategies.

Choosing the right school is also crucial. Reviewing the top 10 online universities ensures you enroll in an institution known for quality education, robust support services, and solid accreditation.

Best Scientists Citing Scott J. Edgett

Recently Published Articles