World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
31166
World Ranking
14949
National Ranking
7554

Ronald G. Blasberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald G. Blasberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 302 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronald G. Blasberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald G. Blasberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald G. Blasberg is affiliated with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Medicine, and Immunology and Microbiology, with a particular focus on Immunology, Cancer Research, Oncology, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

Their work covers several primary topics, prominently featuring Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism; Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers; Immune cells in cancer; Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment; Cancer Research and Treatments; Immunotherapy and Immune Responses; and Immune Cell Function and Interaction.

Frequent co-authors in their research include Inna Serganova, Ivan Cohen, Masatomo Maeda, Masahiro Shindo, and Mayuresh Mane.

Publications by Ronald G. Blasberg appear in several scientific venues, with multiple papers in Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts, Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics, Cancers, Cancer Research, and Nature.

Notable recent papers include:

  • CTLA-4 blockade drives loss of Treg stability in glycolysis-low tumours, 2021, Nature
  • Lactate Dehydrogenase A Depletion Alters MyC-CaP Tumor Metabolism, Microenvironment, and CAR T Cell Therapy, 2020, Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics
  • Genetic and Drug Inhibition of LDH-A: Effects on Murine Gliomas, 2022, Cancers
  • Increased tumor glycolysis is associated with decreased immune infiltration across human solid tumors, 2022, Frontiers in Immunology
  • The AQARA Principle: Proposing Standard Requirements for Radionuclide-Based Images in Medical Journals, 2020, Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Best Publications

  • Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data:

    Clifford S. Patlak;Ronald G. Blasberg;Joseph D. Fenstermacher

  • Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations:

    Clifford S. Patlak;Ronald G. Blasberg

  • Tumor-reactive CD4+ T cells develop cytotoxic activity and eradicate large established melanoma after transfer into lymphopenic hosts

    Sergio A. Quezada;Tyler R. Simpson;Karl S. Peggs;Taha Merghoub

  • Distinct organ-specific metastatic potential of individual breast cancer cells and primary tumors

    Andy J. Minn;Yibin Kang;Inna Serganova;Gaorav P. Gupta

  • Transport of α-Aminoisobutyric Acid across Brain Capillary and Cellular Membranes

    Ronald G. Blasberg;Joseph D. Fenstermacher;Clifford S. Patlak

  • Breast cancer bone metastasis mediated by the Smad tumor suppressor pathway

    Yibin Kang;Wei He;Shaun Tulley;Gaorav P. Gupta

  • Imaging the expression of transfected genes in vivo.

    Juri G. Tjuvajev;Gunther Stockhammer;Revathi Desai;Hisao Uehara

  • Imaging herpes virus thymidine kinase gene transfer and expression by positron emission tomography.

    Juri G. Tjuvajev;Norbert Avril;Takamitsu Oku;Toshio Sasajima

  • Imaging Transgene Expression with Radionuclide Imaging Technologies

    S. S. Gambhir;H. R. Herschman;Simon R Cherry;J. R. Barrio

  • Intrathecal chemotherapy: brain tissue profiles after ventriculocisternal perfusion.

    R G Blasberg;C Patlak;J D Fenstermacher

  • Noninvasive Imaging of Herpes Virus Thymidine Kinase Gene Transfer and Expression: A Potential Method for Monitoring Clinical Gene Therapy

    Juri G. Tjuvajev;Ronald Finn;Kyoichi Watanabe;Revathi Joshi

  • Residual cerebral activity and behavioural fragments can remain in the persistently vegetative brain

    Nicholas D. Schiff;Urs Ribary;Diana Rodriguez Moreno;Bradley Beattie

  • Comparison of bolus and infusion methods for receptor quantitation: application to [18F]cyclofoxy and positron emission tomography.

    Richard E. Carson;Michael A. Channing;Ronald G. Blasberg;Bonnie B. Dunn

  • Substrate specificity of steady-state amino acid transport in mouse brain slices

    Ronald Blasberg;Ronald Blasberg;Abel Lajtha;Abel Lajtha

  • Comparison of Radiolabeled Nucleoside Probes (FIAU, FHBG, and FHPG) for PET Imaging of HSV1-tk Gene Expression

    Juri Gelovani Tjuvajev;Mikhail Doubrovin;Timothy Akhurst;Shangde Cai

  • A novel triple-modality reporter gene for whole-body fluorescent, bioluminescent, and nuclear noninvasive imaging

    Vladimir Ponomarev;Michael Doubrovin;Inna Serganova;Jelena Vider

  • Methods for Quantifying the transport of drugs across brain barrier systems.

    Joseph D. Fenstermacher;Ronald G. Blasberg;Clifford S. Patlak

  • Surface-enhanced resonance Raman scattering nanostars for high-precision cancer imaging

    Stefan Harmsen;Ruimin Huang;Matthew A. Wall;Matthew A. Wall;Hazem Karabeber

  • Imaging transcriptional regulation of p53-dependent genes with positron emission tomography in vivo

    Michael Doubrovin;Vladimir Ponomarev;Tatiana Beresten;Julius Balatoni

  • CTLA-4 blockade drives loss of T reg stability in glycolysis-low tumours

    Roberta Zappasodi;Inna Serganova;Ivan J. Cohen;Masatomo Maeda

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason A. Koutcher
Jason A. Koutcher Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Steven M. Larson
Steven M. Larson Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michel Sadelain
Michel Sadelain Columbia University
Wolfgang A. Weber
Wolfgang A. Weber Technical University of Munich
Yuman Fong
Yuman Fong City Of Hope National Medical Center
Jason S. Lewis
Jason S. Lewis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Kenner C. Rice
Kenner C. Rice National Institutes of Health
Taha Merghoub
Taha Merghoub Cornell University
Richard E. Carson
Richard E. Carson Yale University
Howard T. Thaler
Howard T. Thaler Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in pursuing a medical career in the USA, there are many flexible, affordable online degree options that can open new career paths. Fields such as medical billing, coding, and nursing offer online programs at various levels — from certificates to doctorates.

For those looking to enter administrative roles in healthcare, evaluating medical coding certification cost is an important first step. Certification courses can fit different budgets and help learners quickly qualify for in-demand jobs.

Aspiring nurses can find the cheapest online nursing programs to begin their careers with minimal debt. Those seeking advanced practice roles may consider the cheapest fnp programs for specialized, high-paying nurse practitioner positions.

For nurses aiming at research, leadership, or teaching, enrolling in an online nursing doctorate can help advance your expertise and set you apart in the field. Choosing accredited, affordable programs makes these goals more accessible to motivated students everywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald G. Blasberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles