World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 89 2123 1904 767 638 259 46826

Mark E. Tuckerman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark E. Tuckerman between 1990 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark E. Tuckerman published across 37 years, from 1990 to 2026, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2023. 12 of the 336 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2023. 1990: 2 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1990 2026

336 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark E. Tuckerman: publications per year, 1990 to 2026
Year Publications
1990 2
1991 7
1992 2
1993 3
1994 4
1995 5
1996 3
1997 4
1998 9
1999 11
2000 5
2001 6
2002 11
2003 7
2004 8
2005 9
2006 16
2007 8
2008 8
2009 7
2010 14
2011 19
2012 6
2013 5
2014 9
2015 4
2016 10
2017 7
2018 8
2019 12
2020 11
2021 13
2022 17
2023 42
2024 12
2025 11
2026 1
Total 336
Download as CSV

Mark E. Tuckerman publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Tuckerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 259 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100 259
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark E. Tuckerman D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Tuckerman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235 89
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark E. Tuckerman is a researcher affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their work spans primarily the fields of Engineering and Materials Science, with a substantial focus on subfields such as Materials Chemistry, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics and Optics, Biomedical Engineering, and Catalysis.

The scientist's main research topics include Machine Learning in Materials Science, Fuel Cells and Related Materials, Computational Drug Discovery Methods, Protein Structure and Dynamics, Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques, Ionic Liquids Properties and Applications, and Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies.

Mark E. Tuckerman has contributed to numerous publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review of Fundamentals and Applications, 2020, Chemical Reviews
  • Quantum chemical accuracy from density functional approximations via machine learning, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Liquid Structure and Transport Properties of the Deep Eutectic Solvent Ethaline, 2020, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
  • Imidacloprid Crystal Polymorphs for Disease Vector Control and Pollinator Protection, 2021, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Molecular simulations: past, present, and future (a Topical Issue in EPJB), 2022, The European Physical Journal B

Frequent collaborators in their research include Tamar Zelovich, Leslie Vogt-Maranto, Brian Doherty, Burcu Gurkan, and Jutta Rogal. These co-authors have appeared in multiple joint publications, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Mark E. Tuckerman's work appears regularly in well-known venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Nature Communications
  • Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

The research focus extends across theoretical and applied aspects dealing with molecular simulations, ionic liquids, and machine learning methodologies aimed at improving materials characterization and computational drug discovery techniques. This diverse portfolio demonstrates a broad engagement with contemporary scientific challenges in materials and biological systems.

Best Publications

  • Nosé-Hoover chains : the canonical ensemble via continuous dynamics

    Glenn J. Martyna;Michael L. Klein;Mark Tuckerman

  • Reversible multiple time scale molecular dynamics

    M. Tuckerman;B. J. Berne;G. J. Martyna

  • Deep Eutectic Solvents: A Review of Fundamentals and Applications.

    Benworth B. Hansen;Stephanie Spittle;Brian Chen;Derrick Poe

  • Explicit reversible integrators for extended systems dynamics

    Glenn J. Martyna;Mark E. Tuckerman;Douglas J. Tobias;Michael L. Klein

  • The nature of the hydrated excess proton in water

    Dominik Marx;Mark E. Tuckerman;Jürg Hutter;Michele Parrinello

  • Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Molecular Simulation

    Mark E. Tuckerman

  • The nature and transport mechanism of hydrated hydroxide ions in aqueous solution

    Mark E. Tuckerman;Dominik Marx;Michele Parrinello

  • Ab initio molecular dynamics simulation of the solvation and transport of hydronium and hydroxyl ions in water

    M. Tuckerman;K. Laasonen;K. Laasonen;M. Sprik;M. Parrinello

  • On the quantum nature of the shared proton in hydrogen bonds

    Mark E. Tuckerman;Dominik Marx;Michael L. Klein;Michele Parrinello

  • A reciprocal space based method for treating long range interactions in ab initio and force-field-based calculations in clusters

    Glenn J. Martyna;Mark E. Tuckerman

  • By-passing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning

    Felix Brockherde;Leslie Vogt;Li Li;Mark E. Tuckerman

  • Ab initio molecular dynamics simulation of the solvation and transport of H3O+ and OH- ions in water

    Mark Tuckerman;Kari Laasonen;Michiel Sprik;Michele Parrinello;Michele Parrinello

  • A Liouville-operator derived measure-preserving integrator for molecular dynamics simulations in the isothermal?isobaric ensemble

    Mark E Tuckerman;Mark E Tuckerman;José Alejandre;Roberto López-Rendón;Andrea L Jochim

  • Bypassing the Kohn-Sham equations with machine learning

    Felix Brockherde;Felix Brockherde;Leslie Vogt;Li Li;Mark E. Tuckerman;Mark E. Tuckerman

  • Report on the sixth blind test of organic crystal-structure prediction methods

    Anthony M. Reilly;Richard I. Cooper;Claire S. Adjiman;Saswata Bhattacharya

  • Efficient molecular dynamics and hybrid Monte Carlo algorithms for path integrals

    Mark E. Tuckerman;Bruce J. Berne;Glenn J. Martyna;Michael L. Klein

  • The mechanism of proton conduction in phosphoric acid

    Linas Vilčiauskas;Mark E. Tuckerman;Gabriel Bester;Stephen J. Paddison

  • Understanding Modern Molecular Dynamics: Techniques and Applications

    Mark E. Tuckerman;Glenn J. Martyna

  • Aqueous Basic Solutions: Hydroxide Solvation, Structural Diffusion, and Comparison to the Hydrated Proton

    Dominik Marx;Amalendu Chandra;Mark E. Tuckerman

  • Ab initio molecular dynamics: Concepts, recent developments, and future trends

    Radu Iftimie;Peter Minary;Mark E. Tuckerman

  • Efficient and general algorithms for path integral Car–Parrinello molecular dynamics

    Mark E. Tuckerman;Dominik Marx;Michael L. Klein;Michele Parrinello

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael L. Klein
Michael L. Klein Temple University
Bruce J. Berne
Bruce J. Berne Columbia University
Stephen J. Paddison
Stephen J. Paddison University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Zlatko Bačić
Zlatko Bačić New York University
Dominik Marx
Dominik Marx Ruhr University Bochum
Klaus-Robert Müller
Klaus-Robert Müller Technical University of Berlin
Christopher J. Mundy
Christopher J. Mundy Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Chulsung Bae
Chulsung Bae Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Bart Kahr
Bart Kahr New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA can open doors to diverse career paths, especially when combined with related fields like forensic science, criminal justice, and legal studies. For example, a forensic science degree often leverages strong chemistry skills and offers competitive forensic science degree salary prospects, making it an attractive option for science enthusiasts interested in law enforcement.

Those considering flexible learning options might explore online programs, including criminal justice degree online cost comparisons to find affordable and reputable courses. Many institutions offer affordable paths to entering the field, especially through the best online associate degree programs in criminal justice, which provide foundational knowledge to start a career or continue education.

Additionally, chemistry graduates might find roles supporting legal professionals, such as becoming a paralegal. Exploring paralegal salary data alongside relevant degree options can help determine if this career trajectory fits your goals. Each of these pathways benefits from interdisciplinary knowledge born out of a solid foundation in chemistry combined with legal and criminal justice expertise.

To make informed decisions, it’s essential to review resources like forensic science degree salary, criminal justice degree online cost, best online associate degree programs in criminal justice, and paralegal salary.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Tuckerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles