World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 51 582 197 140 9179

Robert M. Koch publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert M. Koch between 1951 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert M. Koch published across 75 years, from 1951 to 2025, averaging 1.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 1982. 1 of the 142 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1951 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 1982. 1951: 1 publication 1952: 0 publications 1953: 1 publication 1954: 0 publications 1955: 5 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 1 publication 1959: 3 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 2 publications 1962: 6 publications 1963: 2 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 5 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 2 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 2 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 2 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 11 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1951 2025

142 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert M. Koch: publications per year, 1951 to 2025
Year Publications
1951 1
1952 0
1953 1
1954 0
1955 5
1956 0
1957 0
1958 1
1959 3
1960 0
1961 2
1962 6
1963 2
1964 1
1965 1
1966 5
1967 0
1968 0
1969 2
1970 2
1971 1
1972 0
1973 2
1974 5
1975 1
1976 2
1977 2
1978 5
1979 2
1980 0
1981 1
1982 11
1983 1
1984 2
1985 8
1986 3
1987 5
1988 4
1989 4
1990 5
1991 8
1992 6
1993 3
1994 9
1995 4
1996 2
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 3
2003 0
2004 1
2005 2
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 0
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 142
Download as CSV

Robert M. Koch publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Koch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 139–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 140 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92 140
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Robert M. Koch D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Koch sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34 51
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1976 - The Rockefeller Prentice Memorial Award in Animal Breeding and Genetics, American Society of Animal Science

Overview

Robert M. Koch was affiliated with the United States Department of Agriculture in the United States. Their research contributions included work on vibroacoustic performance evaluation in engineering contexts.

One of their recent published papers was titled Evaluation of Vibroacoustic Performance of a Multilayered Submersible Hull using Energy Finite Element Analysis, published in 2025 in the journal Acoustics Australia.

Their frequent co-authors included:

  • Sungmin Lee
  • Nickolas Vlahopoulos

Robert M. Koch's publications commonly appeared in the following venue:

  • Acoustics Australia

In 1976, Koch received the Rockefeller Prentice Memorial Award in Animal Breeding and Genetics from the American Society of Animal Science.

Best Publications

  • Efficiency of Feed Use in Beef Cattle

    Robert M. Koch;L. A. Swiger;Doyle Chambers;K. E. Gregory

  • Comparisons of Bos Indicus and Bos Taurus Inheritance for Carcass Beef Characteristics and Meat Palatability

    John D. Crouse;Larry V. Cundiff;Robert M. Koch;Mohammad Koohmaraie

  • Effect of energy level on reproductive phenomena of mature Hereford cows.

    J. N. Wiltbank;W. W. Rowden;J. E. Ingalls;K. E. Geegoey

  • Characterization of Biological Types of Cattle (Cycle III).III. Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability

    R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch;M. E. Dikeman;M. E. Dikeman;M. E. Dikeman;D. M. Allen;D. M. Allen;D. M. Allen;M. May;M. May;M. May

  • Effect of marbling degree on beef palatability in Bos taurus and Bos indicus cattle

    T. L. Wheeler;L. V. Cundiff;R. M. Koch

  • Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle IV): carcass traits and longissimus palatability.

    T L Wheeler;L V Cundiff;R M Koch;J D Crouse

  • Effects of Heterosis on Age and Weight at Puberty in Beef Heifers

    J. N. Wiltbank;K. E. Gregory;L. A. Swiger;J. E. Ingalls

  • Heritabilities and Genetic, Environmental and Phenotypic Correlations of Carcass Traits in a Population of Diverse Biological Types and their Implications in Selection Programs

    R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch;L. V. Cundiff;L. V. Cundiff;K. E. Gregory;K. E. Gregory

  • Genetic and phenotypic (co)variances for growth and carcass traits of purebred and composite populations of beef cattle.

    K. E. Gregory;L. V. Cundiff;R. M. Koch

  • Parameter estimates for direct, maternal, and grandmaternal genetic effects for birth weight and weaning weight in Hereford cattle.

    J Dodenhoff;L D Van Vleck;S D Kachman;R M Koch

  • Breed effects, retained heterosis, and estimates of genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat traits of beef cattle.

    K. E. Gregory;L. V. Cundiff;R. M. Koch;M. E. Dikeman

  • Carcass Composition, Quality and Palatability Attributes of Bulls and Steers Fed Different Energy Levels and Killed at Four Ages1 ,2

    V. H. Arthaud;V. H. Arthaud;R. W. Mandigo;R. W. Mandigo;R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch;A. W. Kotula;A. W. Kotula

  • Effects of Heterosis on Reproduction in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn Cattle

    Larry V. Cundiff;Keith E. Gregory;Robert M. Koch

  • Heterosis retained in advanced generations of crosses among Angus and Hereford cattle.

    R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch;G. E. Dickerson;G. E. Dickerson;L. V. Cundiff;L. V. Cundiff;K. E. Gregory;K. E. Gregory

  • Breed effects and retained heterosis for growth, carcass, and meat traits in advanced generations of composite populations of beef cattle

    K E Gregory;L V Cundiff;R M Koch;M E Dikeman

  • Twinning in cattle: I. Foundation animals and genetic and environmental effects on twinning rate.

    K E Gregory;S E Echternkamp;G E Dickerson;L V Cundiff

  • Effects of Heterosis on Maternal Performance and Milk Production in Hereford, Angus and Shorthorn Cattle

    Larry V. Cundiff;Larry V. Cundiff;Keith E. Gregory;Keith E. Gregory;Frank J. Schwulst;Frank J. Schwulst;Robert M. Koch;Robert M. Koch

  • Genetics Correlations among Sex-Limited Traits in Beef Cattle

    M. D. MacNeil;M. D. MacNeil;M. D. MacNeil;L. V. Cundiff;L. V. Cundiff;L. V. Cundiff;C. A. Dinkel;C. A. Dinkel;C. A. Dinkel;R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch

  • Longissimus muscle quality, palatability and connective tissue histological characteristics of bulls and steers fed different energy levels and slaughtered at four ages.

    M. E. Dikeman;G. B. Reddy;V. H. Arthaud;H. J. Tuma

  • Selection Criteria for Efficient Beef Production

    G. E. Dickerson;Niklaus Künzi;L. V. Cundiff;R. M. Koch

  • Twinning in cattle: III. Effects of twinning on dystocia, reproductive traits, calf survival, calf growth and cow productivity.

    K E Gregory;S E Echternkamp;G E Dickerson;L V Cundiff

  • Characterization of Biological Types of Cattle—Cycle III: II. Growth Rate and Puberty in Females

    Keith E. Gregory;Keith E. Gregory;D. B. Laster;D. B. Laster;L. V. Cundiff;L. V. Cundiff;G. M. Smith;G. M. Smith

  • Between- and within-breed genetic analysis of calving traits and survival to weaning in beef cattle.

    L. V. Cundiff;L. V. Cundiff;M. D. MacNeil;M. D. MacNeil;K. E. Gregory;K. E. Gregory;R. M. Koch;R. M. Koch

  • Breed effects and heterosis in advanced generations of composite populations for puberty and scrotal traits of beef cattle.

    K E Gregory;D D Lunstra;L V Cundiff;R M Koch

  • Genetic and Environmental Relationships among Economic Characters in Beef Cattle III. Evaluating Maternal Environment

    Robert M. Koch;R. T. Clark

  • Estimates of genetic and phenotypicparameters for carcass and meat traitsof beef cattle

    K.E. Gregory;L.V. Cundiff;R.M. Koch;M. Koohmaraie

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith E. Gregory
Keith E. Gregory United States Department of Agriculture
Larry V. Cundiff
Larry V. Cundiff Agricultural Research Service
Gordon E. Dickerson
Gordon E. Dickerson United States Department of Agriculture
Michael D. MacNeil
Michael D. MacNeil University of the Free State
L.D. Van Vleck
L.D. Van Vleck United States Department of Agriculture
Mohammad Koohmaraie
Mohammad Koohmaraie IEH Laboratories and Consulting Group
Michael E. Dikeman
Michael E. Dikeman Kansas State University
Tommy L. Wheeler
Tommy L. Wheeler United States Department of Agriculture
S. C. Seideman
S. C. Seideman University of Arkansas at Fayetteville

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science or Veterinary studies opens up diverse career pathways. For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond traditional animal care, interdisciplinary programs such as marriage and family therapy masters programs online offer unique skills in counseling and support, which can be valuable in animal-assisted therapy fields.

Advanced education options like online counseling phd programs provide further specialization for those wanting to integrate mental health and behavioral science into animal welfare or veterinary social work careers.

For careers directly related to animals, explore various animal degrees that cover everything from wildlife conservation to veterinary technology. These programs highlight practical and research skills essential for working with animals in diverse settings.

Moreover, leadership roles such as those in sports and recreation management sometimes intersect with animal science fields, especially in collegiate or community programs involving animal-assisted activities. Understanding what does an athletic director do can inspire animal science graduates to pursue dynamic managerial positions that combine their passion for animals with organizational expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Koch

Recently Published Articles