World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 37 10663 10365 34 34 205 6544

Robert Jenssen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Jenssen between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Jenssen published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 4.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2017. 30 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2017. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
1971 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Jenssen: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 1
1973 1
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 6
2004 5
2005 3
2006 11
2007 5
2008 2
2009 5
2010 4
2011 3
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 5
2016 7
2017 35
2018 24
2019 17
2020 20
2021 22
2022 12
2023 14
2024 12
2025 18
Total 247
Download as CSV

Robert Jenssen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Jenssen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 202–211 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 205 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508 205
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Jenssen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Jenssen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990 37
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert Jenssen is affiliated with the University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with an emphasis on artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, signal processing, and media technology.

Their work spans multiple topics, including:

  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Time Series Analysis and Forecasting
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Remote-Sensing Image Classification

Robert Jenssen has contributed to several recent research papers, including:

  • Deep Image Translation With an Affinity-Based Change Prior for Unsupervised Multimodal Change Detection, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Dense Dilated Convolutions' Merging Network for Land Cover Classification, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
  • Code-Aligned Autoencoders for Unsupervised Change Detection in Multimodal Remote Sensing Images, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • Anomaly detection-inspired few-shot medical image segmentation through self-supervision with supervoxels, 2022, Medical Image Analysis
  • Mixing up contrastive learning: Self-supervised representation learning for time series, 2022, Pattern Recognition Letters

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Jenssen include:

  • Michael Kampffmeyer
  • Kristoffer Wickstrøm
  • Karl Øyvind Mikalsen
  • Shujian Yu
  • Sigurd Løkse

Their research has been published in leading venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
  • Pattern Recognition
  • Expert Systems with Applications
  • IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing

Best Publications

  • Semantic Segmentation of Small Objects and Modeling of Uncertainty in Urban Remote Sensing Images Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks

    Michael Kampffmeyer;Arnt-Borre Salberg;Robert Jenssen

  • Automatic autonomous vision-based power line inspection: A review of current status and the potential role of deep learning

    Van Nhan Nguyen;Robert Jenssen;Davide Roverso

  • Kernel Entropy Component Analysis

    R. Jenssen

  • An overview and comparative analysis of Recurrent Neural Networks for Short Term Load Forecasting

    Filippo Maria Bianchi;Enrico Maiorino;Michael C. Kampffmeyer;Antonello Rizzi

  • Recurrent Neural Networks for Short-Term Load Forecasting

    Filippo Maria Bianchi;Enrico Maiorino;Michael C. Kampffmeyer;Antonello Rizzi

  • Intelligent Monitoring and Inspection of Power Line Components Powered by UAVs and Deep Learning

    Van Nhan Nguyen;Robert Jenssen;Davide Roverso

  • Uncertainty and interpretability in convolutional neural networks for semantic segmentation of colorectal polyps.

    Kristoffer Wickstrøm;Michael Kampffmeyer;Robert Jenssen

  • Deep Image Translation With an Affinity-Based Change Prior for Unsupervised Multimodal Change Detection

    Luigi Tommaso Luppino;Michael Kampffmeyer;Filippo Maria Bianchi;Gabriele Moser

  • Anomaly Detection-Inspired Few-Shot Medical Image Segmentation Through Self-Supervision With Supervoxels

    Unknown

  • Deep Image Translation with an Affinity-Based Change Prior for Unsupervised Multimodal Change Detection.

    Luigi Tommaso Luppino;Michael Kampffmeyer;Filippo Maria Bianchi;Gabriele Moser

  • The Cauchy–Schwarz divergence and Parzen windowing: Connections to graph theory and Mercer kernels

    Robert Jenssen;Jose C. Principe;Deniz Erdogmus;Torbjørn Eltoft

  • Clustering using Renyi's entropy

    R. Jenssen;K.E. Hild;D. Erdogmus;J.C. Principe

  • Code-Aligned Autoencoders for Unsupervised Change Detection in Multimodal Remote Sensing Images.

    Luigi Tommaso Luppino;Mads A. Hansen;Michael Kampffmeyer;Filippo Maria Bianchi

  • Reservoir Computing Approaches for Representation and Classification of Multivariate Time Series

    Filippo Maria Bianchi;Simone Scardapane;Sigurd Lokse;Robert Jenssen

  • Dense Dilated Convolutions’ Merging Network for Land Cover Classification

    Qinghui Liu;Michael Kampffmeyer;Robert Jenssen;Arnt-Borre Salberg

  • Time series cluster kernel for learning similarities between multivariate time series with missing data

    Karl Øyvind Mikalsen;Filippo Maria Bianchi;Cristina Soguero-Ruiz;Robert Jenssen

  • Support Vector Feature Selection for Early Detection of Anastomosis Leakage From Bag-of-Words in Electronic Health Records

    Cristina Soguero-Ruiz;Kristian Hindberg;Jose Luis Rojo-Alvarez;Stein Olav Skrovseth

  • Spectral Clustering of Polarimetric SAR Data with the Wishart-Derived Distance Measures

    Stian Normann Anfinsen;Robert Jenssen;Torbjørn Eltoft

  • Reconsidering Representation Alignment for Multi-view Clustering

    Daniel J. Trosten;Sigurd Lokse;Robert Jenssen;Michael Kampffmeyer

  • Independent component analysis for texture segmentation

    Robert Jenssen;Torbjørn Eltoft

  • Mean shift spectral clustering

    Umut Ozertem;Deniz Erdogmus;Robert Jenssen

  • Predicting colorectal surgical complications using heterogeneous clinical data and kernel methods

    Cristina Soguero-Ruiz;Kristian Hindberg;Inmaculada Mora-Jiménez;José Luis Rojo-Álvarez

  • UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND INTERPRETABILITY IN CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL NETWORKS FOR POLYP SEGMENTATION

    Kristoffer Wickstrom;Michael Kampffmeyer;Robert Jenssen

  • Proceedings of the 16th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis

    Arnt-Børre Salberg;Jon Yngve Hardeberg;Robert Jenssen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jose C. Principe
Jose C. Principe University of Florida
Deniz Erdogmus
Deniz Erdogmus Northeastern University
Gabriele Moser
Gabriele Moser University of Genoa
Alexander G. Schwing
Alexander G. Schwing University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Gustau Camps-Valls
Gustau Camps-Valls University of Valencia
Sebastiano B. Serpico
Sebastiano B. Serpico University of Genoa
Luis Gómez-Chova
Luis Gómez-Chova University of Valencia
Cesare Alippi
Cesare Alippi Polytechnic University of Milan
Klaus-Robert Müller
Klaus-Robert Müller Technical University of Berlin
Marius Kloft
Marius Kloft Technical University of Kaiserslautern

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a Computer Science degree in the USA, it's worth exploring related online degrees and certifications that can help broaden your skill set and open doors to new careers. Areas like electrical engineering complement many computer science fields, and with electrical engineering online tuition costs becoming more affordable, online programs can be a cost-effective alternative.

For those looking for a faster route to boost their resume, consider gaining easy certifications that pay well. These credentials often require less time and investment, yet can qualify you for entry-level tech roles or niche IT jobs.

Time-conscious learners may also want to look into the fastest online master's degree options. These accelerated programs allow you to advance your education and career prospects in as little as a year, often with flexible study schedules.

Ultimately, it's important to choose programs with strong job placement and long-term value. Review the masters degrees that are worth it to help ensure your investment pays off with in-demand skills and rewarding career outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Jenssen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles