World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
20942
World Ranking
15300
National Ranking
1405

Robert J. Naylor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Naylor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 354 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert J. Naylor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Naylor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Naylor is affiliated with the University of Bradford in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile focuses on research without any specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or identified fields and subfields of study listed in the available data.

There is no detailed information regarding recent papers by Robert J. Naylor, including titles, years of publication, or venues. Similarly, there are no listed frequent co-authors or consistent publication venues associated with their research output.

The data does not specify particular main fields or subfields of study, nor does it provide specific main topics on which Robert J. Naylor has worked. There is no record of book publications or awards in the provided information.

This profile is based strictly on the source data received, reflecting the information currently available on Robert J. Naylor's academic and research career.

Best Publications

  • Exploration of mice in a black and white test box: Validation as a model of anxiety

    B. Costall;B.J. Jones;M.E. Kelly;M.E. Kelly;R.J. Naylor;R.J. Naylor

  • Effects of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, GR38032F, on raised dopaminergic activity in the mesolimbic system of the rat and marmoset brain.

    B. Costall;A.M. Domeney;R.J. Naylor;M.B. Tyers;M.B. Tyers

  • The potential anxiolytic activity of GR38032F, a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist.

    B.J. Jones;B. Costall;A.M. Domeney;M.E. Kelly

  • 5-HT3 receptors mediate inhibition of acetylcholine release in cortical tissue.

    J. M. Barnes;N. M. Barnes;B. Costall;R. J. Naylor

  • The psychopharmacology of 5-HT3 receptors.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor;Michael B. Tyers

  • The role of telencephalic dopaminergic systems in the mediation of apomorphine-sterrotyped behaviour

    B. Costall;R.J. Naylor

  • Stereotyped behaviour patterns and hyperactivity induced by amphetamine and apomorphine after discrete 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of extrapyramidal and mesolimbic nuclei

    Brenda Costall;C. David Marsden;Robert J. Naylor;Christopher J. Pycock

  • Differential involvement of neurotransmitters through the time course of cisplatin-induced emesis as revealed by therapy with specific receptor antagonists

    P.J. Hesketh;S. Van Belle;M. Aapro;F.D. Tattersall

  • Catalepsy and circling behaviour after intracerebral injections of neuroleptic, cholinergic and anticholinergic agents into the caudate-putamen, globus pallidus and substantia nigra of rat brain.

    B. Costall;R.J. Naylor;J.E. Olley

  • The actions of nicotine and cocaine in a mouse model of anxiety.

    B Costall;M E Kelly;R J Naylor;E S Onaivi

  • Differentiation of the dopamine mechanisms mediating stereotyped behaviour and hyperactivity in the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor;Joseph G. Cannon;Theresa Lee

  • 5-Hydroxytryptamine M-receptor antagonism to prevent cisplatin-induced emesis.

    B. Costall;A.M. Domeney;R.J. Naylor;F.D. Tattersall

  • Climbing behaviour induced by apomorphine in mice: A potential model for the detection of neuroleptic activity

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor;Virinder Nohria

  • The behavioural effects of dopamine applied intracerebrally to areas of the mesolimbic system.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor

  • Zacopride: anxiolytic profile in rodent and primate models of anxiety

    B Costall;A M Domeney;P A Gerrard;M E Kelly

  • Detection of the neuroleptic properties of clozapine, sulpiride and thioridazine

    B. Costall;R. J. Naylor

  • Serotonergic involvement with neuroleptic catalepsy.

    B. Costall;D.H. Fortune;R.J. Naylor;C.D. Marsden

  • On catalepsy and catatonia and the predictability of the catalepsy test for neuroleptic activity.

    B. Costall;R. J. Naylor

  • On the mode of action of apomorphine.

    B. Costall;R.J. Naylor

  • Stereotyped and circling behaviour induced by dopaminergic agonists after lesions of the midbrain raphe nuclei.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Brenda Costall
Brenda Costall University of Bradford
Charles David Marsden
Charles David Marsden King's College London
Peter Jenner
Peter Jenner King's College London
James W. Ironside
James W. Ironside University of Edinburgh
John L. Neumeyer
John L. Neumeyer Harvard University
Christopher R. Lowe
Christopher R. Lowe University of Cambridge
Paul G. Hellewell
Paul G. Hellewell Brunel University London
Matthias Hamburger
Matthias Hamburger University of Basel
Kurt Hostettmann
Kurt Hostettmann University of Geneva
Robert W. Egan
Robert W. Egan Schering-Plough

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more flexible pathways than ever, thanks to the rise of online programs in healthcare. Many students are interested in rn bsn online programs no clinicals, which allow registered nurses to earn their BSN without the need for additional clinical hours. This can be especially appealing to working nurses seeking career advancement on their own schedule.

For those aiming for the highest levels of nursing practice, there are now options like the shortest dnp program online and shortest dnp program. These Doctor of Nursing Practice programs are designed to be completed rapidly, catering to motivated professionals looking to move into leadership or specialized roles.

If you are at the beginning of your healthcare career, an lpn accelerated program offers a fast-track route to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse. These intensive online courses can help start a healthcare career sooner while providing flexibility for busy adults.

Online degree options make it easier than ever to enter or advance in the medical field—always be sure to review accreditation and clinical requirements before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Naylor

Recently Published Articles