World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
21884
World Ranking
14762
National Ranking
1358

Brenda Costall publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda Costall sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 349 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Brenda Costall D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brenda Costall sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brenda Costall is affiliated with the University of Bradford in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile does not list recent published papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues to date.

There is no available information on book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or specific topics of research associated with Brenda Costall.

No recorded awards or distinctions have been documented in the provided data.

Brenda Costall is currently active in their academic career.

Best Publications

  • Exploration of mice in a black and white test box: Validation as a model of anxiety

    B. Costall;B.J. Jones;M.E. Kelly;M.E. Kelly;R.J. Naylor;R.J. Naylor

  • Development of a class of selective cholecystokinin type B receptor antagonists having potent anxiolytic activity.

    J Hughes;P Boden;B Costall;A Domeney

  • Effects of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, GR38032F, on raised dopaminergic activity in the mesolimbic system of the rat and marmoset brain.

    B. Costall;A.M. Domeney;R.J. Naylor;M.B. Tyers;M.B. Tyers

  • The potential anxiolytic activity of GR38032F, a 5-HT3-receptor antagonist.

    B.J. Jones;B. Costall;A.M. Domeney;M.E. Kelly

  • Thyroid hormones, brain function and cognition: a brief review.

    Jeremy W Smith;A Tudor Evans;B Costall;James W Smythe

  • Gestational stress induces post-partum depression-like behaviour and alters maternal care in rats

    J W Smith;Jonathan Seckl;A T Evans;B Costall

  • 5-HT3 receptors mediate inhibition of acetylcholine release in cortical tissue.

    J. M. Barnes;N. M. Barnes;B. Costall;R. J. Naylor

  • The psychopharmacology of 5-HT3 receptors.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor;Michael B. Tyers

  • The role of telencephalic dopaminergic systems in the mediation of apomorphine-sterrotyped behaviour

    B. Costall;R.J. Naylor

  • Stereotyped behaviour patterns and hyperactivity induced by amphetamine and apomorphine after discrete 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of extrapyramidal and mesolimbic nuclei

    Brenda Costall;C. David Marsden;Robert J. Naylor;Christopher J. Pycock

  • Catalepsy and circling behaviour after intracerebral injections of neuroleptic, cholinergic and anticholinergic agents into the caudate-putamen, globus pallidus and substantia nigra of rat brain.

    B. Costall;R.J. Naylor;J.E. Olley

  • The actions of nicotine and cocaine in a mouse model of anxiety.

    B Costall;M E Kelly;R J Naylor;E S Onaivi

  • Differentiation of the dopamine mechanisms mediating stereotyped behaviour and hyperactivity in the nucleus accumbens and caudate-putamen.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor;Joseph G. Cannon;Theresa Lee

  • 5-Hydroxytryptamine M-receptor antagonism to prevent cisplatin-induced emesis.

    B. Costall;A.M. Domeney;R.J. Naylor;F.D. Tattersall

  • Climbing behaviour induced by apomorphine in mice: A potential model for the detection of neuroleptic activity

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor;Virinder Nohria

  • The behavioural effects of dopamine applied intracerebrally to areas of the mesolimbic system.

    Brenda Costall;Robert J. Naylor

  • Cholinergic- and neuroleptic-induced catalepsy: modification by lesions in the caudate-putamen.

    B. Costall;J.E. Olley

  • Zacopride: anxiolytic profile in rodent and primate models of anxiety

    B Costall;A M Domeney;P A Gerrard;M E Kelly

  • Detection of the neuroleptic properties of clozapine, sulpiride and thioridazine

    B. Costall;R. J. Naylor

  • Serotonergic involvement with neuroleptic catalepsy.

    B. Costall;D.H. Fortune;R.J. Naylor;C.D. Marsden

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert J. Naylor
Robert J. Naylor University of Bradford
Charles David Marsden
Charles David Marsden King's College London
Peter Jenner
Peter Jenner King's College London
James W. Ironside
James W. Ironside University of Edinburgh
Joanna C. Neill
Joanna C. Neill University of Bradford
John L. Neumeyer
John L. Neumeyer Harvard University
Matthias Hamburger
Matthias Hamburger University of Basel
Kurt Hostettmann
Kurt Hostettmann University of Geneva
Peter A. Crooks
Peter A. Crooks University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
John Francis William Deakin
John Francis William Deakin University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open up a diverse range of career pathways in healthcare beyond traditional medicine. For those interested in healthcare leadership, pursuing one of the cheapest mha online programs is a cost-effective way to prepare for management roles in hospitals or clinics.

Advanced practice nurses can boost their credentials by enrolling in cheap dnp online programs, which focus on leadership and clinical expertise. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists can achieve their goals with convenient and flexible online pharmd programs, often designed for working professionals.

For those interested in the intersection of technology and healthcare, a health information management bachelor degree online prepares students for vital roles in data management and health informatics.

These affordable online degrees offer flexible learning options and can lead to rewarding, high-demand careers in today's evolving healthcare landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Brenda Costall

Recently Published Articles