World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard P. Gallagher

Richard P. Gallagher

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 77 18321 17211 773 730 229 25653

Richard P. Gallagher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard P. Gallagher between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard P. Gallagher published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2023. 13 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2023. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 40 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 11 publications
1982 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard P. Gallagher: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 1
1984 4
1985 5
1986 1
1987 3
1988 4
1989 3
1990 7
1991 8
1992 4
1993 2
1994 4
1995 7
1996 9
1997 8
1998 8
1999 11
2000 6
2001 4
2002 4
2003 4
2004 7
2005 15
2006 13
2007 12
2008 5
2009 2
2010 12
2011 8
2012 5
2013 4
2014 5
2015 7
2016 10
2017 4
2018 2
2019 4
2020 3
2021 4
2022 1
2023 40
2024 2
2025 11
Total 284
Download as CSV

Richard P. Gallagher publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 229 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487 229
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard P. Gallagher D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard P. Gallagher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730 77
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard P. Gallagher is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a strong emphasis on oncology and cancer research.

Their published work includes multiple topics, notably cutaneous melanoma detection and management, melanoma and MAPK pathways, immunotherapy and immune responses, skin protection and aging, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, vitamin D research studies, and air quality and health impacts.

Frequent publication venues for their research include UNC Libraries, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, JNCI Cancer Spectrum, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, and Cancer Reports.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard P. Gallagher are Marianne Berwick, Peter A. Kanetsky, Colin B. Begg, Nancy E. Thomas, and Klaus J. Busam.

Their recent papers include:

  • Comparison of Clinicopathologic Features and Survival of Histopathologically Amelanotic and Pigmented Melanomas: A Population-Based Study, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Association Between NRAS and BRAF Mutational Status and Melanoma-Specific Survival Among Patients With Higher-Risk Primary Melanoma, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Association of Known Melanoma Risk Factors with Primary Melanoma of the Scalp and Neck, 2020, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention
  • Persistent organic pollutants and risk of cutaneous malignant melanoma among women, 2021, Cancer Reports
  • Comparison of community pathologists with expert dermatopathologists evaluating Breslow thickness and histopathologic subtype in a large international population-based study of melanoma, 2021, JAAD International

Best Publications

  • Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy: collaborative reanalysis of data from 51 epidemiological studies of 52 705 women with breast cancer and 108 411 women without breast cancer

    E. E. Calle;C. W. Heath;R. J. Coates;J. M. Liff

  • Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives : collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 53.297 women with breast cancer and 100.239 women without breast cancer from 54 epidemiological studies

    E. E. Calle;C. W. Heath;H. L. Miracle-McMahill;R. J. Coates

  • Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer - Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58 515 women with breast cancer and 95 067 women without the disease

    N Hamajima;K Hirose;K Tajima;T Rohan

  • Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: Individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • Prostate Cancer in Relation to Diet, Physical Activity, and Body Size in Blacks, Whites, and Asians in the United States and Canada

    Whittemore As;Kolonel Ln;Wu Ah;John Em

  • Dietary intake of fiber and decreased risk of cancers of the colon and rectum: Evidence from the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies

    Geoffrey R. Howe;Enrique Benito;Roberto Castelleto;Jacqueline Cornée

  • Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence

    N. Hamajima;K. Hirose;K. Tajima;T. Rohan

  • Diet, Physical Activity, and Colorectal Cancer Among Chinese in North America and China

    Alice S. Whittemore;Anna H. Wu-Williams;Marion Lee;Zheng Shu

  • Genetic variation in TNF and IL10 and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a report from the InterLymph Consortium

    Nathaniel Rothman;Christine F Skibola;Sophia S Wang;Gareth Morgan

  • Family History and Prostate Cancer Risk in Black, White, and Asian Men in the United States and Canada

    Alice S. Whittemore;Anna H. Wu;Laurence N. Kolonel;Esther M. John

  • Power-Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields and Risk of Childhood Leukemia in Canada

    M. L. McBride;R. P. Gallagher;G. Thériault;B. G. Armstrong

  • Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Grade in Primary Melanomas Is Independently Associated With Melanoma-Specific Survival in the Population-Based Genes, Environment and Melanoma Study

    Nancy E. Thomas;Klaus J. Busam;Lynn From;Anne Kricker

  • The relationship between dietary fat intake and risk of colorectal cancer: evidence from the combined analysis of 13 case-control studies

    Geoffrey R. Howe;Kristan J. Aronson;Enrique Benito;Roberto Castelleto

  • Lifetime Risk of Melanoma in CDKN2A Mutation Carriers in a Population-Based Sample

    Colin B. Begg;Irene Orlow;Amanda J. Hummer;Bruce K. Armstrong

  • Body site distribution of cutaneous malignant melanoma in relationship to patterns of sun exposure

    J M Elwood;R P Gallagher

  • Cohort Study of Air Canada Pilots: Mortality, Cancer Incidence, and Leukemia Risk

    Pierre R. Band;Nhu D. Le;Raymond Fang;Michéle Deschamps

  • Breast cancer and hormonal contraceptives: further results

    EE Calle;CW Heath;HL Miracle-McMahill;RJ Coates

  • Serum androgens and sex hormone-binding globulins in relation to lifestyle factors in older African-American, white, and Asian men in the United States and Canada.

    A H Wu;A S Whittemore;L N Kolonel;E M John

  • Risk Factors for Ocular Melanoma: Western Canada Melanoma Study

    Gallagher Rp;Elwood Jm;Rootman J;Spinelli Jj

  • Quality, quantity and harmony: the DataSHaPER approach to integrating data across bioclinical studies

    Isabel Fortier;Paul R. Burton;Paula J. Robson;Vincent Ferretti

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Spinelli
John J. Spinelli University of British Columbia
Marianne Berwick
Marianne Berwick University of New Mexico
Bruce K. Armstrong
Bruce K. Armstrong University of Sydney
Colin B. Begg
Colin B. Begg Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Stephen B. Gruber
Stephen B. Gruber City Of Hope National Medical Center
Terence Dwyer
Terence Dwyer University of Oxford
Hoda Anton-Culver
Hoda Anton-Culver University of California, Irvine
Irene Orlow
Irene Orlow Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Angela Brooks-Wilson
Angela Brooks-Wilson Simon Fraser University
Klaus J. Busam
Klaus J. Busam Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but looking for flexible study options, online degrees can open doors to growing career paths. Many students choose specialized online programs that offer affordability, convenience, and the ability to earn credentials while balancing other commitments.

For those drawn to medical data and records, explore online schools for health information management. This field is ideal if you enjoy technology and want to play a vital role in organizing patient information.

If you prefer a focused and in-demand administrative role, online medical billing and coding programs offer quick entry into the healthcare workforce. These credentials are valued by hospitals and clinics nationwide.

Nursing also offers strong online pathways. The cheapest FNP programs lead to advanced practice as a Family Nurse Practitioner, while affordable nursing programs are available for those seeking a registered nurse career.

With these online options, students can begin diverse healthcare careers or strengthen qualifications for future study in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Richard P. Gallagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles