World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard N. Pierson

Richard N. Pierson

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
18484
World Ranking
19450
National Ranking
9685

Richard N. Pierson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard N. Pierson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 408 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard N. Pierson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard N. Pierson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard N. Pierson is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has a significant body of research focused primarily within the medical field. Their scholarly output addresses a wide array of subjects, notably within surgery, genetics, molecular biology, transplantation, and immunology.

Their research concentrates on several specialized topics, including:

  • Xenotransplantation and immune response
  • Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Some of their most recent and relevant publications include:

  • Progress Toward Cardiac Xenotransplantation, 2020, Circulation
  • Recruited macrophages elicit atrial fibrillation, 2023, Science
  • Milestones on the path to clinical pig organ xenotransplantation, 2023, American Journal of Transplantation
  • Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic, 2022, Cardiovascular Research
  • Hemodynamic and Clinical Performance of Hearts Donated After Circulatory Death, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard N. Pierson include Zahra Habibabady, Lars Burdorf, Kohei Kinoshita, Agnes M. Azimzadeh, and David Ayares. These partnerships suggest a collaborative research environment focused on transplantation and immunological studies.

Publication venues where their work appears often reflect areas related to transplantation science and immunology, featuring prominently in journals such as:

  • Transplantation
  • American Journal of Transplantation
  • Xenotransplantation
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • Frontiers in Immunology

The research output shows a focus on the development and improvement of organ transplantation procedures, immune response mechanisms particularly related to xenotransplantation, as well as regenerative medicine techniques. This body of work contributes to advancing understanding in medical science related to heart and organ transplants, including the clinical application of cardiac xenotransplantation and associated immunological challenges.

Best Publications

  • Magnitude of body-cell-mass depletion and the timing of death from wasting in AIDS.

    Donald P Kotler;Anita R Tierney;Jack Wang;Richard N Pierson

  • Bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values for phase angle by age and sex.

    Maria Cristina G. Barbosa-Silva;Aluisio J. D. Barros;Jack Wang;Steven B. Heymsfield

  • Relation of BMI to fat and fat-free mass among children and adolescents

    D S Freedman;J Wang;L M Maynard;J C Thornton

  • Body composition studies in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

    D P Kotler;J Wang;R N Pierson

  • Factors influencing body composition in persons with spinal cord injury: a cross-sectional study

    Ann M. Spungen;Rodney H. Adkins;Charles A. Stewart;Jack Wang

  • Chronic mechanical circulatory support for inotrope-dependent heart failure patients who are not transplant candidates: results of the INTrEPID Trial.

    Joseph G. Rogers;Javed Butler;Steven L. Lansman;Alan Gass

  • Circulating interferon-α levels and hypertriglyceridemia in the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

    Carl Grunfeld;Carl Grunfeld;Donald P. Kotler;Donald P. Kotler;Judyy Kwan Shigenaga;Judyy Kwan Shigenaga;William Doerrler;William Doerrler

  • Measurement of percentage of body fat in 411 children and adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with a four-compartment model.

    Aviva B. Sopher;John C. Thornton;Jack Wang;Richard N. Pierson

  • Report of the Xenotransplantation Advisory Committee of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: the present status of xenotransplantation and its potential role in the treatment of end-stage cardiac and pulmonary diseases.

    D.K.C. Cooper;A.M. Keogh;J. Brink;P.A. Corris

  • Sex and race differences in fat distribution among Asian, African-American, and Caucasian prepubertal children.

    Qing He;Mary Horlick;John Thornton;Jack Wang

  • Hemodynamic Exercise Testing A Valuable Tool in the Selection of Cardiac Transplantation Candidates

    Don B. Chomsky;Chim C. Lang;Glenn H. Rayos;Yu Shyr

  • Body fat and water changes during pregnancy in women with different body weight and weight gain.

    Sally Ann Lederman;Anne Paxton;Anne Paxton;Steven B. Heymsfield;Steven B. Heymsfield;Jack Wang;Jack Wang

  • Classification of body fatness by body mass index-for-age categories among children.

    David S. Freedman;Jack Wang;John C. Thornton;Zuguo Mei

  • Bone mineral density and mass in a cross-sectional study of white and asian women

    Mary Russell‐Aulet;Jack Wang;John C. Thornton;Edward W.D. Colt

  • Racial/ethnic differences in body fatness among children and adolescents.

    David S. Freedman;Jack Wang;John C. Thornton;Zuguo Mei

  • Pre-transplant reversible pulmonary hypertension predicts higher risk for mortality after cardiac transplantation.

    Javed Butler;Mark A. Stankewicz;Jack Wu;Don B. Chomsky;Don B. Chomsky

  • Bioelectrical impedance analysis models for prediction of total body water and fat-free mass in healthy and HIV-infected children and adolescents.

    Mary Horlick;Stephen M Arpadi;James Bethel;Jack Wang

  • Relationship between renal function and left ventricular assist device use.

    Javed Butler;Javed Butler;Carrie Geisberg;Renee Howser;Peer M. Portner

  • The prediction of body fatness by BMI and skinfold thicknesses among children and adolescents

    David S Freedman;Jack Wang;Cynthia L Ogden;John C Thornton

  • Inducing CTLA-4–Dependent Immune Regulation by Selective CD28 Blockade Promotes Regulatory T Cells in Organ Transplantation

    Nicolas Poirier;Agnes M. Azimzadeh;Tianshu Zhang;Nahzli Dilek

Frequent Co-Authors

David Ayares
David Ayares University of Maryland, Baltimore
Bartley P. Griffith
Bartley P. Griffith University of Maryland, Baltimore
David K. C. Cooper
David K. C. Cooper University of Pittsburgh
Javed Butler
Javed Butler University of Mississippi
Bernhard J. Hering
Bernhard J. Hering University of Minnesota
Simon C. Robson
Simon C. Robson Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Peter J. Cowan
Peter J. Cowan University of Melbourne
Megan Sykes
Megan Sykes Columbia University
Stephen S. Gottlieb
Stephen S. Gottlieb University of Maryland, Baltimore
Laurence B. Peterson
Laurence B. Peterson Roche (Switzerland)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in healthcare but not ready to pursue a traditional medical degree, there are numerous online pathways to consider. Exploring the best online schools for high school students can provide a foundation in healthcare-related fields, as many programs offer flexible schedules and industry-focused courses.

For those drawn to the administrative side of medicine, look into medical coding. Understanding how much does it cost to become a medical coder can help you plan for certification and entry into a growing job market. Costs are often lower compared to other healthcare careers and the programs are typically shorter.

Nursing remains a popular choice, with many affordable online options. Prospective nurse practitioners should research the cheapest online nurse practitioner programs for a cost-effective route to an advanced career. Similarly, if you’re considering registered nursing, understanding how much does online nursing school cost is crucial for budgeting your education.

These alternative career pathways can open doors in the medical field without the extensive time and expense of a traditional MD, making healthcare careers more accessible to everyone.

Best Scientists Citing Richard N. Pierson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles