| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 58 | 1396 | 364 | 157 | 8465 |
The chart shows the history of publications by Richard E. McCarty between 1965 and 2008, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard E. McCarty published across 44 years, from 1965 to 2008, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1976. 6 of the 169 publications appeared in the last two years.
169 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1965 | 2 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 1 |
| 1968 | 2 |
| 1969 | 2 |
| 1970 | 4 |
| 1971 | 5 |
| 1972 | 4 |
| 1973 | 5 |
| 1974 | 3 |
| 1975 | 1 |
| 1976 | 10 |
| 1977 | 2 |
| 1978 | 3 |
| 1979 | 5 |
| 1980 | 5 |
| 1981 | 1 |
| 1982 | 10 |
| 1983 | 6 |
| 1984 | 7 |
| 1985 | 8 |
| 1986 | 4 |
| 1987 | 5 |
| 1988 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 4 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 4 |
| 1995 | 7 |
| 1996 | 7 |
| 1997 | 3 |
| 1998 | 6 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2000 | 5 |
| 2001 | 3 |
| 2002 | 7 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| 2004 | 3 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 1 |
| 2007 | 3 |
| 2008 | 3 |
| Total | 169 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. McCarty sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 157 publications — 61st percentile
61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | 157 |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. McCarty sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 58 D-Index — 80th percentile
80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | 58 |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
C M Nalin;R E McCarty
Richard E. McCarty;Efraim Racker
Richard E. McCarty;John Fagan
S R Ketcham;J W Davenport;K Warncke;R E McCarty
M L Richter;W J Patrie;R E McCarty
Günter A. Hauska;Richard E. McCarty;Richard J. Berzborn;Efraim Racker
Archie R. Portis;Richard E. McCarty
Richard E. McCarty;Jonathan S. Fuhrman;Yoko Tsuchiya
Egbert J. Boekema;Jianping Xiao;Richard E. McCarty
Richard E. McCarty;R. J. Guillory;Efraim Racker
Richard E. McCarty;Phillip R. Pittman;Yoko Tsuchiya
A R Portis;R E McCarty
James V. Moroney;Linda Lopresti;Bruce F. McEwen;Richard E. McCarty
M L Richter;R E McCarty
Mark L. Richter;Brian Snyder;Richard E. McCarty;Gordon G. Hammes
J V Moroney;C S Fullmer;R E McCarty
Mark M. Anderson;Richard E. McCarty;Elizabeth A. Zimmer
John D. Mills;David Crowther;Rudolf E. Slovacek;Geoffrey Hind
Robert E. Gaensslen;Richard E. McCarty
Richard Shingles;Marisa North;Richard E. McCarty
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.